5 research outputs found

    Routine gastric residual volume measurement and energy target achievement in the PICU: A comparison study

    Get PDF
    Critically ill children frequently fail to achieve adequate energy intake and some care practices, such as the measurement of gastric residual volume (GRV) may contribute to this problem. We compared outcomes in two similar European Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs): one which routinely measures GRV (PICU-GRV) to one unit that does not (PICU-noGRV). An observational pilot comparison study was undertaken. 87 children were included in the study, 42 (PICU-GRV) and 45 (PICU-noGRV). There were no significant differences in the percentage of energy targets achieved in the first four days of PICU admission although PICU-noGRV showed more consistent delivery of median (and IQR) energy targets, and less under and over feeding for PICU-GRV and PICU-noGRV Day 1 37 (14-72) vs 44 (0-100); Day 2 97 (53-126) vs 100 (100-100), Day 3 84 (45-112) vs 100 (100-100) , Day 4 101 (63-124) vs 100 (100-100). The incidence of vomiting was higher in PICU-GRV. No necrotising enterocolitis was confirmed in either unit and ventilator acquired pneumonia rates were not significantly different (7.01 vs 12 5.31 per 1000 ventilator days; p=0.70) between PICU-GRV and PICU-noGRV units. Conclusions: The practice of routine gastric residual measurement did not significantly impair energy targets in the first four days of PICU admission. However, not measuring GRV did not increase vomiting, ventilator acquired pneumonia or necrotising enterocolitis, which is the main reason clinicians cite for measuring GRV. What is known?•The practice of routinely measuring gastric residual volume is widespread in critical care units•This practice is increasingly being questioned in critically ill patients, both as a practice that increases •the likelihood of delivering inadequate enteral nutrition amounts and as a tool to assess feeding tolerance What is new? •Not routinely measuring gastric residual volume did not increase adverse events of ventilator acquired pneumonia, necrotising enterocolitis or vomiting •In the first four days of PICU stay, energy target achievement was not significantly different, but the rates of under and over feeding were higher in the routine GRV measurement uni

    Refined mapping of the epilepsy susceptibility locus EJM1 on chromosome 6

    No full text
    Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) is a genetically determined common subtype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Linkage to the HLA complex on chromosome 6p21.3 and an allelic association with HLA-DR13 and -DQB1 alleles suggest that a susceptibility locus for JME, designated as "EJM1," is located within or near the HLA region. However, further studies revealed controversial results, and genetic heterogeneity has been suspected. The present study was designed to evaluate the validity of the association and linkage findings and to refine the map position of EJM1. Our association analysis showed no significant difference of the frequency of HLA-DR13 carriers in 62 German JME patients compared with that in 77 German controls (X2 = 0.98, df = 1, p = 0.161, one-tailed). Multipoint linkage analysis with use of microsatellite markers from the chromosomal region 6p25-q13 in 29 German families of JME patients provided significant evidence that an epilepsy locus (EJM1) close to the HLA locus confers susceptibility to "idiopathic" generalized seizures (Zmax = 3.27 at theta max = 0.033 centromeric to the HLA-DQ locus), assuming an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance with 70% penetrance. Haplotype analyses revealed key recombinations in five families, which locate EJM1 to the centromeric side of the HLA-DQ locus. This study confirms a causative role of EJM1 in the pathogenesis of idiopathic generalized seizures in the majority of German families of JME patients and refines a candidate region of 10.1 cM in the chromosomal region 6p21 between the flanking loci HLA-DQ and D6S1019. A possible explanation for the current controversial results in families of different populations might be ethnic variation of interfering polygenic effects that could be permissive for heterogeneous susceptibility alleles
    corecore