4 research outputs found
Early identification of treatment non-response in first-episode psychosis
Background
Approximately one-third of patients with psychotic disorders does not respond to standard antipsychotic treatments. Consensus criteria for treatment resistance (TR) may aid the identification of non-response and subsequent tailoring of treatments. Since consensus criteria require stability of clinical status, they are challenging to apply in first-episode psychosis (FEP). This study aims to investigate (a) if an adaptation of consensus criteria can be used to identify FEP patients with early signs of TR (no early clinical recoveryβno-ECR) after 1 year in treatment and (b) to what extent differences in antipsychotic treatments differentiate between outcome groups.
Methods
Participants with FEP DSM-IV schizophrenia spectrum disorders were recruited during their first treatment. A total of 207 participated in the 1-year follow-up. Remission and recovery definitions were based on adaptations of the βRemission in Schizophrenia Working Groupβ criteria and TR on adaptations of the βTreatment Response and Resistance in Psychosisβ (TRRIP) working group criteria.
Results
97 participants (47%) could be classified as no-ECR, 61 (30%) as ECR, and 49 (23%) as with partial ECR (P-ECR). Statistically significant baseline predictors of no-ECR matched previously identified predictors of long-term TR. Only 35 no-ECR participants had two adequate treatment trials and met the full TRRIP criteria. 21 no-ECR participants were using the same medication over the follow-up year despite the lack of significant effects.
Conclusion
The difference in the percentage of FEP participants classified as no-ECR versus TR indicates that we may underestimate the prevalence of early TR when using consensus criteria.publishedVersio
Π Π°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² Π² Π·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ (Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ° Ρ Π°Π΄ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ, ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ 25)
ΠΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² Π² Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΠΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊΡΠ·Π½Π΅ΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎ 70% ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ΅. ΠΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΌ Π² ΠΆΠΈΠ»ΡΠ΅ Π³ΠΈΠ±Π½Π΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠ°ΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎ 80% Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ. ΠΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΎΠΌ, ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ Π² Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΠΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊΡΠ·Π½Π΅ΡΠΊΠ΅, ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ°ΠΉΠΎΠ½. Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ° β ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² Π² Π·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π²ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΠΎΠΌΡΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. Π ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΡΠ» ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π±Π΅Π·ΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² Π·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΡΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π° Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΡ, Π²Π»ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠ°ΡΠ° Π² Π²ΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡ
.Analysis of fires in the city of Novokuznetsk shows that about 70% of fires occur in the residential sector. While the housing dies in fires, about 80% of people according to recent statistics. The object of study is a residential building located in the city of Novokuznetsk Central district. The aim of the project is to develop tactical actions on a touch-NIJ fires in high-rise buildings on the example of the above-mentioned object of study. In the process of the study was an analytical review of scientific papers and news articles on issues of fire safety in buildings, industrial heights, are the characteristic of the object studied and the factors affecting the development of fire in high-rise buildings
The PRAISE study: A prospective, multi-center, randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled study for the evaluation of iloprost in the early postoperative period after liver transplantation (ISRCTN12622749)
Abstract Background Liver graft dysfunction can deteriorate to complete organ failure and increases perioperative morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation. Therapeutic strategies reducing the rate of graft dysfunction are of current clinical relevance. One approach is the systemic application of prostaglandins, which were demonstrated to be beneficial in reducing ischemia-reperfusion injury. Preliminary data indicate a positive effect of prostacyclin analogue iloprost on allograft viability after liver transplantation. The objective of the study is to evaluate the impact of iloprost in a multi-center trial. Methods/Design A prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter study in a total of 365 liver transplant recipients was designed to assess the effect of intravenous iloprost after liver transplantation. Primary endpoint will be the primary graft dysfunction characterized as presentation of one or more of the following criteria: ALAT or ASAT levelβ>β2000 IU/ml within the first 7 postoperative days, bilirubineββ₯β10 mg/dl on postoperative day 7; INRββ₯β1.6 on postoperative day 7 or initial non-function. Secondary endpoints are parameters of post-transplant morbidity, like rates of infections, biliary complications, need of clotting factors or renal replacement therapy and the graft and patient survival. Discussion A well-established treatment concept to avoid graft dysfunction after liver transplantation does not exist at the moment. If the data of this research project confirm prior findings, iloprost would improve the general outcome after liver transplantation. Trial Registration German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00003514. Current Controlled Trials Register: ISRCTN12622749.</p