Reasons for diagnostic delays in Bipolar Disorder:Systematic review and narrative synthesis

Background: Bipolar disorder is common, affecting 1% of people. The diagnosis of bipolar disorder is often delayed, which limits access to effective treatment and increases the burden of disease on individuals, families, and society.Aim: This paper investigates the individual, social, and clinical factors that contribute to delays in diagnosis for people with bipolar disorder, including delays that occur before and after a person presents to a primary care clinician.Design and setting: Systematic review and narrative synthesis.Method: Four electronic databases - Embase, Medline, PsychInfo, and Global Health - were systematically searched. This search yielded 3078 studies, 21 of which met the inclusion criteria. The data retrieved were analysed using Braun and Clarke’s Thematic Analysis to report a summary of recent research on the delays in the diagnosis of bipolar disorder.Results: Analysis of the data from the 21 studies identified five main themes as reasons for delays in diagnosis: (1) misdiagnosis, (2) healthcare challenges, (3) mental health stigma, (4) the complex nature of bipolar disorder, and (5) individual factors.Conclusions: The review demonstrates the importance of educating individuals, families, and clinicians on the symptomology of bipolar disorder to avoid misdiagnosis. Furthermore, changes in the accessibility and delivery of mental health services are essential to ensure that people with bipolar disorder are diagnosed and treated in a timely manner. In addition, mental health stigma among individuals, families, and clinicians must be addressed to reduce diagnostic delays

Trajectories of depressive symptoms among older adults and in adults with hip fracture: Analysis from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

Background: This study aimed to determine trajectories of depressive symptoms among older adults in England, overall and for those with hip fracture. The study aimed to explore the differential characteristics of each trajectory identified.   Methods: Analysis of adults aged 60 years or more (n=7,050), including a hip fracture subgroup (n = 384), from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Latent class growth mixture modelling was completed. Depressive symptom prevalence was estimated at baseline. Chi-squared tests were completed to compare baseline characteristics across trajectories.   Results: Three trajectories of depressive symptoms (no, mild, and moderate-severe) were identified overall and for those with hip fracture. The moderate-severe trajectory comprised 13.7% and 7% of participants for overall and hip fracture populations, respectively. The proportion of participants with depressive symptoms in the moderate-severe trajectory was 65.4% and 85.2% for overall and hip fracture populations, respectively. Depressive symptoms were stable over time, with a weak trend towards increasing severity for the moderate-severe symptom trajectory. Participants in the moderate-severe symptom trajectory were older, more likely to be female, live alone and had worse health measures than other trajectories (p < 0.001).   Conclusions: Older adults, and those with hip fracture, follow one of three trajectories of depressive symptoms which are broadly stable over time. Depressive symptoms’ prevalence was higher for those with hip fracture and, when present, the symptoms were more severe than the overall population. Results suggest a role of factors including age, gender, and marital status in depressive symptoms trajectories

Orthopaedic physiotherapists’ perceptions of mechanisms for observed variation in the implementation of physiotherapy practices in the early postoperative phase after hip fracture: a UK qualitative study

Objective: To explore physiotherapists’ perceptions of mechanisms to explain observed variation in early postoperative practice after hip fracture surgery demonstrated in a national audit. Methods: A qualitative semi-structured interview study of 21 physiotherapists working on orthopaedic wards at 7 hospitals with different durations of physiotherapy during a recent audit. Thematic analysis of interviews drawing on Normalisation Process Theory to aid interpretation of findings. Results: Four themes were identified: achieving protocolised and personalised care; patient and carer engagement; multidisciplinary team engagement across the care continuum; and strategies for service improvement. Most expressed variation from protocol was legitimate when driven by what is deemed clinically appropriate for a given patient. This tailored approach was deemed essential to optimise patient and carer engagement. Participants reported inconsistent degrees of engagement from the multidisciplinary team attributing this to competing workload priorities, interpreting ‘postoperative physiotherapy’ as a single professional activity rather than a care delivery approach, plus lack of integration between hospital and community care. All participants recognised changes needed at both structural and process levels to improve their services. Conclusions: Physiotherapists highlighted an inherent conflict between their intention to deliver protocolised care while allowing for an individual patient-tailored approach. This conflict has implications for how audit results should be interpreted, how future clinical guidelines are written, and how physiotherapists are trained. Physiotherapists also described additional factors explaining variation in practice which may be addressed through increased engagement of the multidisciplinary team and resources for additional staffing and advanced clinical roles

Frequency, duration, and type of physiotherapy in the week after hip fracture surgery - analysis of implications for discharge home, readmission, survival, and recovery of mobility

Purpose: To examine the association between physiotherapy access after hip fracture and discharge home, readmission, survival, and mobility recovery. Methods: A 2017 Physiotherapy Hip Fracture Sprint Audit was linked to hospital records for 5,383 patients. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between physiotherapy access in the first postoperative week and discharge home, 30-day readmission post-discharge, 30-day survival and 120-days mobility recovery post-admission adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiology grade, Hospital Frailty Risk Score and prefracture mobility/residence. Results: Overall, 73% were female and 40% had high frailty risk. Patients who received ≥2 hours of physiotherapy (versus less) had 3% (95% Confidence Interval: 0-6%), 4% (2-6%), and 6% (1-11%) higher adjusted probabilities of discharge home, survival, and outdoor mobility recovery, and 3% (0-6%) lower adjusted probability of readmission. Recipients of exercise (versus mobilisation alone) had 6% (1-12%), 3% (0-7%), and 11% (3-18%) higher adjusted probabilities of discharge home, survival, and outdoor mobility recovery, and 6% (2-10%) lower adjusted probability of readmission. Recipients of 6-7 days physiotherapy (versus 0-2 days) had 8% (5-11%) higher adjusted probability of survival. For patients with dementia, improved probability of survival, discharge home, readmission and indoor mobility recovery were observed with greater physiotherapy access. Conclusion: Greater access to physiotherapy was associated with a higher probability of positive outcomes. For every 100 patients, greater access could equate to an additional eight patients surviving to 30-days and six avoiding 30-day readmission. The findings suggest a potential benefit in terms of home discharge and outdoor mobility recovery

Listening to patients: using verbal data in the validation of the Aberdeen Measures of Impairment, Activity Limitation and Participation Restriction (Ab-IAP)

Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Virtual Touch (TM) Quantification to Diagnose and Monitor Liver Fibrosis in Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance

King’s Technology Evaluation Centre is funded by NICE to act as an External Assessment Centre for the Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme. The NHS has a financial interest in the guidance issued by NICE as a result of this work and two authors are NHS employees (Prof. Keevil and Dr. Lewis