Hemodiafiltration is associated with reduced inflammation, oxidative stress and improved endothelial risk profile compared to high-flux hemodialysis in children - Fig 3

<p>Percent increase in TAC and percent decrease in SDMA from HD to HDF was more pronounced in patients with higher blood flow rate (A,B). Higher blood flow rate was also associated with lower IL-6 to IL-10 ratio on HDF (C). Percent change = [(HDF-HD)/HD]*100.</p

Hemodiafiltration is associated with reduced inflammation, oxidative stress and improved endothelial risk profile compared to high-flux hemodialysis in children

<div><p>Randomized trials in adults have shown reduced all-cause and cardiovascular mortality on hemodiafiltration (HDF) compared to high-flux hemodialysis (HD), but the mechanisms leading to improved outcomes are not clear. We studied biomarkers of inflammation, oxidative stress, anti-oxidant capacity and endothelial dysfunction in 22 children (13 female, age 8–15 years). All children received HD for at least 3 months, and were then switched to HDF, keeping all dialysis related parameters and dialysis time constant. All the biomarkers of inflammation (ß2-microglobulin, IL-6, IL-10, high sensitive C-reactive protein [hsCRP]), oxidative stress (nitrotyrosine, advanced glycation end-products [AGEs], oxidized low density lipoprotein [ox-LDL] and anti-oxidant capacity) and endothelial dysfunction (asymmetric dimethyl arginine [ADMA], symmetric dimethyl arginine [SDMA]), were comparable between incident and prevalent patients on HD, suggesting that even a short dialysis vintage of 3 months on HD increases inflammation and endothelial stress. After 3 months of HDF therapy there was a significant reduction in ß2-microglobulin (p<0.001), hCRP, ADMA, SDMA, AGEs, ox-LDL (p<0.01 for all) and an increase in total antioxidant capacity (p<0.001) compared to HD. All children were maintained on the same dialyser, dialysis water quality, dialysis time and blood flow speeds suggesting that improved clearances on HDF led to an improved biomarker profile. Even in children with residual renal function there was a significant reduction in ß2 microglobulin, hsCRP, SDMA, ox-LDL and AGEs on HDF compared to HD. Children with a lower blood flow had higher inflammatory status (higher IL-6/IL-10 ratio; p = 0.04, r = -0.43). Children who achieved a higher convective volume (≥median 12.8L/m²) had lower ox-LDL (p = 0.02). In conclusion, we have shown that a significant improvement in inflammation, antioxidant capacity and endothelial risk profile is achieved even within a short time (3 months) on HDF compared to HD treatment.</p><p><b><i>Trial Registration</i>:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov: <a href="https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02063776" target="_blank">NCT02063776</a>.</p></div

Baseline characteristics of the patients.

<p>Baseline characteristics of the patients.</p

Demonstrating the molecular weights of the studied markers and comparison with albumin.

<p>AGEs are not shown in the figure because they are composed of several molecules, which are mostly middle molecules.</p

Comparison of biomarkers in children with and without residual renal function (RRF) on high-flux HD and HDF.

<p>Markers of oxidative stress (A), inflammation (B) and endothelial dysfunction (C) were significantly decreased in addition to a significant increase in anti-oxidant capacity on HDF compared to HD. This improvement was observed not only in patients without RRF but also in patients with RRF.</p

Dialysis related parameters of the patients.

<p>Dialysis related parameters of the patients.</p

Comparison of the inflammatory, oxidative stress and endothelial markers between HD and HDF in patients with and without residual renal function.

<p>Comparison of the inflammatory, oxidative stress and endothelial markers between HD and HDF in patients with and without residual renal function.</p