23 research outputs found
The Role of the Independent Director: Evidence from a Survey of Independent Directors in Australia
The purpose of this paper is to report the results of a
survey of independent directors on a range of issues
relating to the execution of their role including the
independent directors’ perceptions relating to board
effectiveness, board interactions, information sources, and
performance and evaluation. A survey was forwarded to
independent directors of the top 200 Australian Securities
Exchange (ASX) listed companies. The paper aims to
provide the perceptions of independent directors
themselves and so contribute to the literature through a
better understanding of the nature of the work performed
by Australian company independent directors and the
environment in which it occurs. Findings suggest that the
fundamental role of the independent director has not
changed as a result of the corporate governance reforms
The influence of board chairs on director engagement: A case‐based exploration of boardroom decision‐making
The Role of the Independent Director: Evidence from a Survey of Independent Directors in Australia
The Impact of Audit Committee Existence and Audit Committee Meeting Frequency on the External Audit: Perceptions of Australian Auditors
This article examines the impact of audit committee existence, the frequency of audit committee meetings and the auditor's attendance at meetings on aspects of the external audit. Using an experimental design, we find that the audit committee, the frequency of committee meetings and the auditor's attendance at meetings are significantly associated with a reduction in perceived audit risk. The impact on audit efficiency and audit testing is perceived to be minimal. Manager and partner hours are greater when meetings are more frequent and the partner attends all meetings. The audit committee is expected to provide assistance in resolving conflicts with management and to lead to some improvement in overall audit quality. In neither case is this affected by meeting frequency or the auditor's attendance at meetings. Participants expect the existence of an audit committee to lead to an increase in audit fees, particularly when meetings are more frequent and the auditor is required to attend meetings. Reasons given for any fee increase relate to the additional preparation for and attendance at meetings
Experience of Audit Committee Members and Audit Quality
We investigate whether the experience of audit committee members is associated with audit quality. In order to comprehensively analyse the experience of audit committee members, we include audit committee member tenure, age and multiple-directorships in our analysis. Using observations from 2001 to 2012, we undertake analysis on 13,155 firm-year observations and find that all our proxies of audit committee member experience are positively associated with audit fees. A range of additional tests, including using discretionary accruals as an alternative measure of audit quality and differences-in-differences analysis, support our main findings and our results consequently make a number of contributions to both the literature and policy making. One possible policy contribution is that regulators may wish to consider audit committee characteristics representing experience when framing recommendations to improve audit quality and thereby, financial reporting by firms