Public perspectives on protective measures during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, Germany and Italy: A survey study

Background: The extent to which people implement government-issued protective measures is critical in preventing further spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Our study aimed to describe the public belief in the effectiveness of protective measures, the reported implementation of these measures, and to identify communication channels used to acquire information on COVID-19 in European countries during the early stage of the pandemic. Methods and findings: An online survey available in multiple languages was disseminated starting on March 19th, 2020. After five days, we computed descriptive statistics for countries with more than 500 respondents. Each day, we assessed enacted community containment measures by stage of stringency (I-IV). In total, 9,796 adults responded, of whom 8,611 resided in the Netherlands (stage III), 604 in Germany (stage III), and 581 in Italy (stage IV). To explore possible dynamics as containment strategies intensified, we also included 1,365 responses submitted during the following week. Participants indicated support for governmental measures related to avoiding social gatherings, selective closure of public places, and hand hygiene and respiratory measures (range for all measures: 95.0%-99.7%). Respondents from the Netherlands less frequently considered a complete social lockdown effective (59.2%), compared to respondents in Germany (76.6%) or Italy (87.2%). Italian residents applied enforced social distancing measures more frequently (range: 90.2%-99.3%, German and Dutch residents: 67.5%-97.0%) and self-initiated hygienic and social distancing behaviors (range: 36.3%-96.6%, German and Dutch residents: 28.3%-95.7%). Respondents reported being sufficiently informed about the outbreak and behaviors to avoid infection (range: 90.2%-91.1%). Information channels most commonly reported included television newspapers, official health websites, and social media. One week later, we observed no major differences in submitted responses. Conclusions: During the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, belief in the effectiveness of protective measures among survey respondents from three European countries was high and participants reported feeling sufficiently informed. In March 2020, implementation of measures differed between countries and were highest among respondents from Italy, who were subjected to the most stringent lockdown measures and greatest COVID-19 burden in Europe during this period

Diagnostic Value of a Protocolized In-Depth Evaluation of Pediatric Bone Marrow Failure: A Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Study

Background: Severe multilineage cytopenia in childhood caused by bone marrow failure (BMF) often represents a serious condition requiring specific management. Patients are at risk for invasive infections and bleeding complications. Previous studies report low rates of identifiable causes of pediatric BMF, rendering most patients with a descriptive diagnosis such as aplastic anemia (AA). Methods: We conducted a multi-center prospective cohort study in which an extensive diagnostic approach for pediatric patients with suspected BMF was implemented. After exclusion of malignant and transient causes of BMF, patients entered thorough diagnostic evaluation including bone marrow analysis, whole exome sequencing (WES) including copy number variation (CNV) analysis and/or single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) array analysis. In addition, functional and immunological evaluation were performed. Here we report the outcomes of the first 50 patients (2017-2021) evaluated by this approach. Results: In 20 patients (40%) a causative diagnosis was made. In this group, 18 diagnoses were established by genetic analysis, including 14 mutations and 4 chromosomal deletions. The 2 remaining patients had short telomeres while no causative genetic defect was found. Of the remaining 30 patients (60%), 21 were diagnosed with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) based on peripheral multi-lineage cytopenia and hypoplastic bone marrow, and 9 were classified as unexplained cytopenia without bone marrow hypoplasia. In total 28 patients had undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) of which 22 patients with an unknown cause and 6 patients with an identified cause for BMF. Conclusion: We conclude that a standardized in-depth diagnostic protocol as presented here, can increase the frequency of identifiable causes within the heterogeneous group of pediatric BMF. We underline the importance of full genetic analysis complemented by functional tests of all patients as genetic causes are not limited to patients with typical (syndromal) clinical characteristics beyond cytopenia. In addition, it is of importance to apply genome wide genetic analysis, since defects in novel genes are frequently discovered in this group. Identification of a causal abnormality consequently has implications for the choice of treatment and in some cases prevention of invasive therapies