Metastatik safra yolu kanseri olan yaşlı hastalarda optimal tedavi yaklaşımları ve prognostik faktörler

Introduction: There is a lack of evidence of the outcomes in elderly patients advanced stage biliary tract cancer due to the patients aged over 65 years are less than 25% in many prospective trials. We designed a retrospective multicenter study to evaluate the factors affecting treatment and survival in elderly patients with advanced-stage biliary tract cancer. Materials and methods: A total of 116 patients with advanced stage biliary tract cancer aged ≥65 years were included, and the treatment responses, survival, and toxicity rates were evaluated with respect to age groups Results: There was no significant difference between age and response to treatment, survival, or toxicity. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.3, and 11.8 months respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that ECOG PS (p<0.001 CI95% 1.5-3.7) and PNI (p<0.001 CI 95% 0.14-0.41) were significant independent prognostic factors for PFS. The independent prognostic factors for OS were choice of frontline regimen, NLR and PNI (p=0.007 CI 95% 0.71 – 0.94, p=0.006 CI 95% 1.2 – 3.1, p=0.001 CI 95% 0.35 – 0.91, respectively). Discussion: This study confirms the general prognostic relevance of inflammatory parameters and the importance of frontline treatment in elderly patients with advanced-stage biliary tract tumors. Additionally, getting older does not indicate that treatment will be avoided or that they will have a worse prognosis and suffer from more toxicities.Giriş: 65 yaş üzeri hastaların klinik çalışmaların %25’inden daha azını oluşturması nedeniyle biliyer sistem kanseri olan ileri yaş hastaların yönetimi konusunda kanıt eksiği bulunmaktadır. Bu amaçla, metastatik safra yolu kanseri tanılı yaşlı hastalarda tedaviyi ve sağkalımı etkileyen faktörleri değerlendirmek için retrospektif çok merkezli bir çalışma tasarladık. Gereç ve yöntemler: Çalışmaya 65 yaş ve üzeri, ileri evre safra yolu kanseri tanısı almış, 116 hasta dahil edildi ve yaş gruplarına göre tedavi yanıtları, sağkalım ve toksisite oranları değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Median yaşa göre gruplandırılıdğında; yaş ile tedaviye yanıt, sağkalım, toksisite arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı. Tüm populasyonda medyan progresyonsuz sağkalım (PSK) ve genel sağkalım (GSK) sırasıyla 5.3, 11.8 aydı. Multivariate analizde, PSK için bağımsız prognostik faktörler preformans durumu(ECOG PS) (p<0.001 CI95% 1.5-3.7) ve Prognostik nutrisyonel indek (PNI) (p<0.001 CI 95% 0.14-0.41) olarak bulundu. GSK için ise bağımsız prognostik faktörler, birinci sıra tedavi seçimi, Notrofil Lenfosit oranı (p=0,007 CI %95 0,71 – 0,94) ve PNI (p=0,001 CI %95 0,35 – 0,91) olarak bulundu. Tartışma: Metastatik safra yolu kanseri olan yaşlı hastalarda prognozu etkileyen temel faktöreler inflamatuar parametreler ve birinci basamakta seçilen kemoterapi rejimidir. İleri yaş ile sağkalım, toksiste profili ve tedavi toleransı farklılık göstermemektedir

Determining the current situation of geriatric oncology in Turkey: A survey of medical oncologists

Objective: We aimed to capture a snapshot of the current situation in Turkey regarding the management of elderly cancer patients through an online survey of medical oncologists in Turkey. Material and Methods: An anonymized cross-sectional nationwide de-scriptive online survey was sent to the Turkish Society of Medical Oncology members by email in November 2020. Before closing the survey in December 2020, one remainder was sent. Results: The survey was completed by 133 medical oncologists from 41 centers with a 29% response rate. Routine use of geriatric evaluation was practiced by 18.2% of the medical oncologists in their daily practice. A geriatrician was available in the centers of 36.8% of the participants. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was the most commonly employed tool for investigating older cancer patients. Our survey determined that the presence of malnutrition, treatment adherence, comor-bidities, and social support were the most commonly identified challenges while caring for geriatric cancer patients. Hearing problem was the most common reason, followed by dementia, regarding the communication with the elderly cancer patients. Conclusion: Our survey results revealed a very low rate of geriatric evaluation for systemic treatment planning in elderly patients. Moreover, medical oncologists encoun-tered a high rate of communication problems and additional challenges in the care of geriatric cancer patients. These findings signify the need for geriatrics and oncology collaboration for the optimization of geriatric cancer care

Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation: A multicenter study

INTRODUCTION: A significant proportion of cervical cancer (CC) patients are diagnosed at a locally advanced stage. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with locally advanced CC. However, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after CCRT is controversial. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy of AC after CCRT in stage III CC patients. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective analysis of 139 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III CC patients treated with CCRT of whom 45.3% received AC. Our goal was to determine the impact of AC on survival in these patients. RESULTS: Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 37.5% and 16% in patients receiving CCRT with and without AC, respectively (p = 0.008). Median PFS was 30.9 months (CI 95% 14.8-46.9) and 16.6 months (CI 95% 9.3-23.9) in patients receiving CCRT with and without AC, respectively. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 78.2% and 28.4% in patients receiving CCRT with and without AC, respectively (p < 0.001). Median OS was 132.2 months (CI 95, %66.5-197.8) and 34.9 months (CI 95% 23.1-46.7) in patients receiving CCRT with and without AC, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that AC provides OS and PFS benefit in stage III CC patients. Larger studies are needed to identify subgroups of patients who would benefit from AC

Comparing the efficacy of regorafenib and 5-fluorouracil-based rechallenge chemotherapy in the third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Abstract Background The optimal treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after the second line is still controversial. Regorafenib has been the standard of care in this setting as it improved overall survival (OS) compared to placebo. In real-world practice chemotherapy rechallenge is also a preferred option even though supporting evidence is not enough. We aim to compare the efficacy of regorafenib and 5-fluorouracil-based (5-FU) rechallenge treatment in the third line setting of mCRC. Methods In this retrospective multi-institutional trial, mCRC patients from 21 oncology centers who progressed after 2 lines of chemotherapy were analyzed. Patients who were treated with regorafenib or rechallenge therapy in the third-line setting were eligible. Rechallenge chemotherapy was identified as the re-use of the 5-FU based regimen which was administered in one of the previous treatment lines. OS, disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS) and toxicity were analyzed. Results Three hundred ninety-four mCRC patients were included in the study. 128 (32.5%) were in the rechallenge, and 266 (67.5%) were in the regorafenib group. Median PFS was 5.82 months in rechallenge and 4 months in regorafenib arms (hazard ratio:1.45,95% CI, p = 0.167). DCR was higher in the rechallenge group than regorafenib (77% vs 49.5%, respectively, p =  < 0.001). Median OS after the third-line treatment was 11.99 (95% CI, 9.49–14.49) and 8.08 months (95% CI, 6.88–9.29) for rechallenge and regorafenib groups, respectively (hazard ratio:1.51, 95% CI, p < 0.001). More adverse effects and discontinuation were seen with regorafenib treatment. Conclusion Our study revealed that higher disease control and OS rates were achieved with rechallenge treatment compared to regorafenib, especially in patients who achieved disease control in one of the first two lines of therapy

Real-world data on efficacy and safety of first-line alectinib treatment in advanced-stage, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer patients: A Turkish Oncology Group study

Aims: In this multicenter study, the authors aimed to determine the real-life efficacy and safety of first-line alectinib. Materials & methods: This retrospective trial included advanced-stage, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer patients who were treated with first-line alectinib in terms of ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, regardless of previous chemotherapy. The co-primary end points were progression-free survival both for all patients and for the treatment-naive population. The secondary end points were overall response rate, overall survival, rate of CNS progression and safety. Results & conclusion: A total of 274 patients (n = 177 for treatment-naive patients) were enrolled in the study. The median progression-free survival was 26 and 28.8 months for all patients and the treatment-naive group, respectively. The overall response rate, CNS progression rate and 1-year overall survival ratio were 77.9, 12.4 and 77%. Alectinib is a highly effective therapy with a favorable safety profile

Major and minor salivary gland cancers: A multicenter retrospective study

Background: Most of the studies on salivary gland cancers are limited for various reasons such as being single-center, small number of patients, including only major or minor SGCs, or only including epidemiological data. Methods: A total of 37 medical oncology clinics from different regions of Turkey participated in this retrospective-multicenter study. The analyzed data included clinical and demographical features, primary treatment, metastasis localizations, and treatments and includes certain pathologic features. Results: The study included data from a total of 443 SGCs. 56.7% was in major salivary glands and 43.3% was in minor salivary glands. Distant metastasis in the major SGCs was statistically significantly more common than in the minor SGCs, locoregional recurrence was statistically significantly more common in the minor SGCs than in the major SGCs (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Epidemiological information, metastasis and recurrence patterns, treatment modalities, and survival analysis of the patients over 20 years of follow-up are presented