Return to performance following severe ankle, knee, and hip injuries in National Basketball Association players

Abstract The purpose of this study was to compare basketball performance markers one year prior to initial severe lower extremity injury, including ankle, knee, and hip injuries, to one- and two-years following injury during the regular NBA season. Publicly available data were extracted through a reproducible extraction computed programmed process. Eligible participants were NBA players with at least three seasons played between 2008 and 2019, with a time-loss injury reported during the study period. Basketball performance was evaluated for season minutes, points, and rebounds. Prevalence of return to performance and linear regressions were calculated. 285 athletes sustained a severe lower extremity injury. 196 (69%) played one year and 130 (45%) played two years following the injury. Time to return to sport was similar between groin/hip/thigh [227 (88)], knee [260 (160)], or ankle [260 (77)] (P = 0.289). 58 (30%) players participated in a similar number of games and 57 (29%) scored similar points one year following injury. 48 (37%) participated in a similar number of games and 55 (42%) scored a similar number of points two years following injury. Less than half of basketball players that suffered a severe lower extremity injury were participating at the NBA level two years following injury, with similar findings for groin/hip/thigh, knee, and ankle injuries. Less than half of players were performing at previous pre-injury levels two years following injury. Suffering a severe lower extremity injury may be a prognostic factor that can assist sports medicine professionals to educate and set performance expectations for NBA players

ACL injury prevention: Where have we come from and where are we going?

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are one of the most common and severe knee injuries across sports. As such, ACL injury prevention has been a focus of research and sports medicine practice for the past three‐plus decades. Examining the current research and identifying both clinical strategies and research gaps, the aim of this review is to empower clinicians and researchers with knowledge of where the ACL injury prevention literature is currently and where it is going in the future. This paper examines the mechanism of ACL injury prevention, screening, implementation, compliance, adherence, coronavirus, and areas of future research. Clinical significance: The time lag between research and practical implementation in general healthcare settings can be as long as 17 years; however, athletes playing sports today are unable to wait that long. With effective programs already established, implementation and adherence to these programs is essential. Strategies such as coaching education, increasing awareness of free programs, identifying barriers, and overcoming implementation obstacles through creative collaboration are just a few ways that could help improve both ACL injury prevention implementation and adherence