4 research outputs found

    Tomaat : rassenproef 1e beoordeling 2/3 hokkig en 3/5 hokkig : herfstteelt 1982

    Get PDF
    <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Evolution of the genetic code: partial optimization of a random code for robustness to translation error in a rugged fitness landscape"</p><p>http://www.biology-direct.com/content/2/1/24</p><p>Biology Direct 2007;2():24-24.</p><p>Published online 23 Oct 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2211284.</p><p></p>of the standard code; (b) Distribution of the scores for the codes obtained by optimization of the codes from (set ), the blue line is the cost of the code obtained by optimization of the standard code; (c) Minimization percentage of the codes from (see text for details); the blue line is the minimization percentage of the standard code

    Evolution of the genetic code: partial optimization of a random code for robustness to translation error in a rugged fitness landscape-0

    No full text
    <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Evolution of the genetic code: partial optimization of a random code for robustness to translation error in a rugged fitness landscape"</p><p>http://www.biology-direct.com/content/2/1/24</p><p>Biology Direct 2007;2():24-24.</p><p>Published online 23 Oct 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2211284.</p><p></p> cost functions (1) where () is the frequency of codon ; , , are the cost functions (1) for () = 1 , , ;are the cost functions (1) where () is the respective amino acid frequency; in , , (

    Projection of the code maps onto the plane of the first two principal components (see text for details)

    No full text
    <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Evolution of the genetic code: partial optimization of a random code for robustness to translation error in a rugged fitness landscape"</p><p>http://www.biology-direct.com/content/2/1/24</p><p>Biology Direct 2007;2():24-24.</p><p>Published online 23 Oct 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2211284.</p><p></p> Red 'x' signs, random codes, ; red circles, codes resulting from optimization of random codes, ; green squares, random codes that perform better than the standard code, ; green asterisks, codes resulting from optimization of the set , ; blue square, the standard code; blue asterisk, the code resulting from the optimization of the standard code. (a) PRS; (b) the Gilis matrix

    Evolution of the genetic code: partial optimization of a random code for robustness to translation error in a rugged fitness landscape-5

    No full text
    <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Evolution of the genetic code: partial optimization of a random code for robustness to translation error in a rugged fitness landscape"</p><p>http://www.biology-direct.com/content/2/1/24</p><p>Biology Direct 2007;2():24-24.</p><p>Published online 23 Oct 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2211284.</p><p></p>swaps). Crosses show the mean values ± one standard deviation. The green line shows the cost of the standard code, and the blue shows the cost of the code that was obtained by minimization of the standard one. The top x-axis is the number of codes that did not reach their local minimum at the preceding step (starting from 300 random codes). The evolution of each code was followed until the code could not be improved anymore. (b) The number of codes that need exactly pairwise swaps to reach minimum vs ; the blue line is the number of steps for the standard code to reach its local fitness peak (9); the red line is the mean of the distribution (19). (c) Same as (a) but the search started with 100 random codes that outperform the standard code. (d) Same as (b) but the search started with 100 random codes that outperform the standard code
    corecore