State Strategies to Improve Quality and Efficiency: Making the Most of Opportunities in National Health Reform

Examines ten states' initiatives to address key components of quality and efficiency improvement, including data collection, aggregation, and standardization; public reporting; payment reform; consumer engagement; and provider engagement

Participation in the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children is not associated with early childhood socioemotional development: Results from a longitudinal cohort study

AbstractSocioemotional development in early childhood has long-term impacts on health status and social outcomes, and racial and socioeconomic disparities in socioemotional skills emerge early in life. The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is an early childhood nutrition intervention with the potential to ameliorate these disparities. Our objective was to assess the impact of WIC on early socioemotional development in a longitudinal study. We examined the association between WIC participation and scores on the Brief Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (BITSEA) in 327 predominantly African American mother–child dyads who were participants in the longitudinal Conditions Affecting Neurocognitive Development in Early Life (CANDLE) Study (Memphis, TN). To account for selection bias, we used within-child fixed effects to model the variability in each child's BITSEA scores over two measurement occasions (ages 12 and 24months). Final models were adjusted for time-varying characteristics including child age, maternal stress, mental health, child abuse potential, marital status, and food stamp participation. In fully adjusted models, we found no statistically significant effect of WIC on change in socioemotional development (β=0.22 [SD=0.39] and β=−0.58 [SD=0.79] for BITSEA Competence and Problem subdomains, respectively). Using rigorous methods and a longitudinal study design, we found no significant association between WIC and socioemotional development in a high needs population. This finding suggests that early childhood interventions that more specifically target socioemotional development are necessary if we are to reduce racial disparities in socioemotional skills and prevent poor social and health outcomes across the life course

A Guaranteed Income Intervention to Improve the Health and Financial well-being of low-income black emerging adults: study protocol for the Black Economic Equity Movement randomized controlled crossover trial

Background Economic inequity systematically affects Black emerging adults (BEA), aged 18–24, and their healthy trajectory into adulthood. Guaranteed income (GI)–temporary, unconditional cash payments–is gaining traction as a policy solution to address the inequitable distribution of resources sewn by decades of structural racism and disinvestment. GI provides recipients with security, time, and support to enable their transition into adulthood and shows promise for improving mental and physical health outcomes. To date, few GI pilots have targeted emerging adults. The BEEM trial seeks to determine whether providing GI to BEA improves financial wellbeing, mental and physical health as a means to address health disparities. Methods/design Using a randomized controlled crossover trial design, 300 low-income BEA from San Francisco and Oakland, California, are randomized to receive a $500/month GI either during the first 12-months of follow-up (Phase I) or during the second 12-months of a total of 24-months follow-up (Phase II). All participants are offered enrollment in optional peer discussion groups and financial mentoring to bolster financial capability. Primary intention-to-treat analyzes will evaluate the impact of GI at 12 months among Phase I GI recipients compared to waitlist arm participants using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). Primary outcomes include: (a) financial well-being (investing in education/training); (b) mental health status (depressive symptoms); and (c) unmet need for mental health and sexual and reproductive health services. Secondary analyzes will examine effects of optional financial capability components using GEE with causal inference methods to adjust for differences across sub-strata. We will also explore the degree to which GI impacts dissipate after payments end. Study outcomes will be collected via surveys every 3 months throughout the study. A nested longitudinal qualitative cohort of 36 participants will further clarify how GI impacts these outcomes. We also discuss how anti-racism praxis guided the intervention design, evaluation design, and implementation. Discussion Findings will provide the first experimental evidence of whether targeted GI paired with complementary financial programming improves the financial well-being, mental health, and unmet health service needs of urban BEA. Results will contribute timely evidence for utilizing GI as a policy tool to reduce health disparities

The emerging adulthood gap in diabetes prevention research.

Emerging adulthood, the period between ages 18 and 25, is distinct from older and younger populations in terms of both physiology and social circumstances. As a critical developmental window with long-lasting repercussions, emerging adulthood presents a key opportunity for prevention of cardiovascular disease. Despite significant advances in diabetes and cardiovascular disease prevention for other age groups, 18-25 year-olds remain underrepresented in research. Using diabetes prevention as an example, we analyzed the cited evidence behind four major guidelines that influence US clinical practice on screening and management of prediabetes in children and adults, revealing that the majority of these studies in both the pediatric and adult literature do not include emerging adults in their study populations. This gap between the pediatric and adult diabetes prevention literature creates a missing link connecting childhood risks to adult chronic disease. In this article, we draw attention to this often overlooked age group, and provide tangible recommendations as a path forward for both pediatric and adult researchers to increase the representation of emerging adults in diabetes prevention and other cardiovascular disease prevention studies

The emerging adulthood gap in diabetes prevention research

Summary: Emerging adulthood, the period between ages 18 and 25, is distinct from older and younger populations in terms of both physiology and social circumstances. As a critical developmental window with long-lasting repercussions, emerging adulthood presents a key opportunity for prevention of cardiovascular disease. Despite significant advances in diabetes and cardiovascular disease prevention for other age groups, 18–25 year-olds remain underrepresented in research. Using diabetes prevention as an example, we analyzed the cited evidence behind four major guidelines that influence US clinical practice on screening and management of prediabetes in children and adults, revealing that the majority of these studies in both the pediatric and adult literature do not include emerging adults in their study populations. This gap between the pediatric and adult diabetes prevention literature creates a missing link connecting childhood risks to adult chronic disease. In this article, we draw attention to this often overlooked age group, and provide tangible recommendations as a path forward for both pediatric and adult researchers to increase the representation of emerging adults in diabetes prevention and other cardiovascular disease prevention studies

Turning the Ship: Moving From Clinical Treatment to Environmental Prevention: A Health Disparities Policy Advocacy Initiative

· This article examines success factors for a statewide initiative to reduce health disparities by establishing environmental policies to reduce asthma risk factors for school-aged children. · Twelve local coalitions and a statewide network focused on schools, housing, and outdoor air policies. · Multiple types and levels of policy advocacy were encouraged by the Initiative so that issues at the local level linked to larger issues across the state, and conversely state-level policies supported local endeavors. · Factors that contributed to the success of the initiative included: structuring the initiative on a systems change model; employing multiple technical assistance providers to assure fidelity to the model, building capacity, facilitating strategic partnerships, and facilitating mid-course adjustments; communicating “intentional” policy outcomes from the foundation; and structuring an evaluation team to analyze multi-level data and provide feedback at all levels. · Local coalitions that developed meaningful community engagement and used data to educate policy makers were the most successful

Using a Life Course Health Development Framework to Redesign Medicaid.

Since the Affordable Care Act, Medicaid programs serve millions more enrollees across the life course, yet beneficiaries continue to experience high rates of preventable morbidity and mortality rooted in earlier life experiences. By incorporating evidence from life course science into Medicaid, using the Life Course Health Development (LCHD) framework, states can more effectively achieve lifelong health improvement. We describe 5 elements of an LCHD-informed strategy states can use to align Medicaid redesign initiatives toward a common goal of improving life course health outcomes: targeting prevention to sensitive periods; prioritizing intervention on social exposures; maximizing longitudinal continuity in coverage and service delivery; building technological systems with capability to measure performance and outcomes over time; and selecting financial models that support LCHD-informed care. With this framework, states can strategically direct investment to improve health for vulnerable Americans, and assure their investment will pay off over time