25,090 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
The critical events for motor-sensory temporal recalibration
Determining if we, or another agent, were responsible for a sensory event can require an accurate sense of timing. Our sense of appropriate timing relationships must, however, be malleable as there is a variable delay between the physical timing of an event and when sensory signals concerning that event are encoded in the brain. One dramatic demonstration of such malleability involves having people repeatedly press a button thereby causing a beep. If a delay is inserted between button presses and beeps, when it is subsequently taken away beeps can seem to precede the button presses that caused them. For this to occur it is important that people feel they were responsible for instigating the beeps. In terms of their timing, as yet it is not clear what combination of events is important for motor-sensory temporal recalibration. Here, by introducing ballistic reaches of short or longer extent before a button press, we varied the delay between the intention to act and the sensory consequence of that action. This manipulation failed to modulate recalibration magnitude. By contrast, introducing a similarly lengthened delay between button presses and consequent beeps eliminated recalibration. Thus it would seem that the critical timing relationship for motor-sensory temporal recalibration is between tactile signals relating to the completion of an action and the subsequent auditory percept
Recommended from our members
Spatial grouping resolves ambiguity to drive temporal recalibration.
Cross-modal temporal recalibration describes a shift in the point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) between 2 events following repeated exposure to asynchronous cross-modal inputs-the adaptors. Previous research suggested that audiovisual recalibration is insensitive to the spatial relationship between the adaptors. Here we show that audiovisual recalibration can be driven by cross-modal spatial grouping. Twelve participants adapted to alternating trains of lights and tones. Spatial position was manipulated, with alternating sequences of a light then a tone, or a tone then a light, presented on either side of fixation (e.g., left tone-left light-right tone-right light, etc.). As the events were evenly spaced in time, in the absence of spatial-based grouping it would be unclear if tones were leading or lagging lights. However, any grouping of spatially colocalized cross-modal events would result in an unambiguous sense of temporal order. We found that adapting to these stimuli caused the PSS between subsequent lights and tones to shift toward the temporal relationship implied by spatial-based grouping. These data therefore show that temporal recalibration is facilitated by spatial grouping. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)
Recommended from our members
Neural correlates of subjective timing precision and confidence
Humans perceptual judgments are imprecise, as repeated exposures to the same physical stimulation (e.g. audio-visual inputs separated by a constant temporal offset) can result in different decisions. Moreover, there can be marked individual differences â precise judges will repeatedly make the same decision about a given input, whereas imprecise judges will make different decisions. The causes are unclear. We examined this using audio-visual (AV) timing and confidence judgments, in conjunction with electroencephalography (EEG) and multivariate pattern classification analyses. One plausible cause of differences in timing precision is that it scales with variance in the dynamics of evoked brain activity. Another possibility is that equally reliable patterns of brain activity are evoked, but there are systematic differences that scale with precision. Trial-by-trial decoding of input timings from brain activity suggested precision differences may not result from variable dynamics. Instead, precision was associated with evoked responses that were exaggerated (more different from baseline) ~300âms after initial physical stimulations. We suggest excitatory and inhibitory interactions within a winner-take-all neural code for AV timing might exaggerate responses, such that evoked response magnitudes post-stimulation scale with encoding success
Pressure of Hot QCD at Large N_f
We compute the pressure and entropy of hot QCD in the limit of large number
of fermions, N_f >> N_c ~ 1, to next to leading order in N_f. At this order the
calculation can be done exactly, up to ambiguities due to the presence of a
Landau pole in the theory; the ambiguities are O(T^8/\Lambda^4_{Landau}) and
remain negligible long after the perturbative series (in g^2 N_f) has broken
down. Our results can be used to test several proposed resummation schemes for
the pressure of full QCD.Comment: 16 pages including 4 figures. Short enough for you to read. Numerical
results corrected after an error was found by Andreas Ipp and Anton Rebha
Covariant derivative expansion of fermionic effective action at high temperatures
We derive the fermionic contribution to the 1-loop effective action for A_4
and A_i fields at high temperatures, assuming that gluon fields are slowly
varying but allowing for an arbitrary amplitude of A_4.Comment: RevTex 4, 11 pages, 3 figures. Version 2: Typos corrected; magnetic
fields restricted to parallel sector. Version accepted for publication in PR
Hard Thermal Loops and the Sphaleron Rate on the Lattice
We measure the sphaleron rate (topological susceptibility) of hot SU(2) gauge
theory, using a lattice implementation of the hard thermal loop (HTL) effective
action. The HTL degrees of freedom are implemented by an expansion in spherical
harmonics and truncation. Our results for the sphaleron rate agree with the
parametric prediction of Arnold, Son and Yaffe: Gamma ~ \alpha^5 T^4.Comment: 3 page
- âŠ