The clinical applicability of polygenic risk scores for LDL-cholesterol: considerations, current evidence and future perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current review describes the development, clinical relevance and potential caveats of polygenic risk scores (PRS) for LDL cholesterol (LDL-C). RECENT FINDINGS: In recent years, a large number of common variants have been shown to have a small effect on LDL-C levels. The aggregate effect of all of these variants on LDL-C levels can be captured in a PRS and an elevated number of LDL-C increasing common variants is considered to be a cause of high LDL-C levels in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) without a large effect, rare mutation. PRS do not only serve as a tool in diagnostics, but are also helpful in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction. Moreover, PRS modulate CVD risk even in patients without a monogenic FH. However, future larger scale PRS directly aimed at CVD risk may serve as more sensitive tools to identify individuals with severely increased CVD risk. SUMMARY: LDL-C PRS help explain part of hypercholesterolemia in a proportion of dyslipidemic patients that do not have monogenic FH. Nevertheless, the CVD risk conferred by current PRS does not appear to match that of monogenic FH. LDL-C PRS are currently not widely used in clinical care

Assessment of practical applicability and clinical relevance of a commonly used LDL-C polygenic score in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia

Background and aims: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels vary in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and can be explained by a single deleterious genetic variant or by the aggregate effect of multiple, common small-effect variants that can be captured in a polygenic score (PS). We set out to investigate the contribution of a previously published PS to the inter-individual LDL-C variation and coronary artery disease (CAD) risk in patients with a clinical FH phenotype. Methods: First, in a cohort of 628 patients referred for genetic FH testing, we evaluated the distribution of a PS for LDL-C comprising 12 genetic variants. Next, we determined its association with coronary artery disease (CAD) risk using UK Biobank data. Results: The mean PS was higher in 533 FH-variant-negative patients (FH/M-) compared with 95 FH-variant carriers (1.02 vs 0.94, p < 0.001). 39% of all patients had a PS equal to the top 20% from a population-based reference cohort and these patients were less likely to carry an FH variant (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10–0.48) compared with patients in the lowest 20%. In UK Biobank data, the PS explained 7.4% of variance in LDL-C levels and was associated with incident CAD. Addition of PS to a prediction model using age and sex and LDL-C did not increase the c-statistic for predicting CAD risk. Conclusions: This 12-variant PS was higher in FH/M- patients and associated with incident CAD in UK Biobank data. However, the PS did not improve predictive accuracy when added to the readily available characteristics age, sex and LDL-C, suggesting limited discriminative value for CAD

RANKL inhibition for giant cell lesions of the jaw: A retrospective cohort analysis

Background: In all giant-cell-rich lesions (GCRL) occurring in bone, a common underlying excessive RANKL expression is held responsible for the osteolytic activity. Apart from giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB), systematic outcome analysis of RANKL inhibition in other GCRL is unavailable. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of a 1-year denosumab protocol in giant cell lesions of the jaw (GCLJ). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted compromising patients treated with a 1-year protocol of monthly subcutaneously administered 120 mg denosumab. Objective tumour response based on histology and imaging was used to calculate objective tumour response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and time to progression. Type, severity and frequency of adverse events were recorded in a standardised way to assess safety. Results: Twenty patients, predominantly female (90%), were included. Fifty-five per cent of lesions were located in the mandible; most classified as aggressive lesions (90%). Thirty-five per cent (7/20) of cases were either recurrent after prior treatment or progressive, while on other drug treatment. Objective tumour response rate was 100% after 12 months of treatment. Median PFS was 50.4 months (95% CI 38.0–62.8) with a cumulative PFS rate of 22.6% (95% CI 1.8–43.4) at 5 years follow-up. Median time to progression was 38.4 months (95% CI 26.0–50.8). Treatment was well tolerated, and none of the patients had to interrupt therapy for toxicity. Conclusion: High-dose denosumab is effective and safe in achieving a complete response in GCLJ within 12 months. The high long-term relapse rate after treatment cessation is the main obstacle for denosumab to become standard treatment for GCLJ

RANKL inhibition for giant cell lesions of the jaw: A retrospective cohort analysis

Background: In all giant-cell-rich lesions (GCRL) occurring in bone, a common underlying excessive RANKL expression is held responsible for the osteolytic activity. Apart from giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB), systematic outcome analysis of RANKL inhibition in other GCRL is unavailable. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of a 1-year denosumab protocol in giant cell lesions of the jaw (GCLJ). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted compromising patients treated with a 1-year protocol of monthly subcutaneously administered 120 mg denosumab. Objective tumour response based on histology and imaging was used to calculate objective tumour response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and time to progression. Type, severity and frequency of adverse events were recorded in a standardised way to assess safety. Results: Twenty patients, predominantly female (90%), were included. Fifty-five per cent of lesions were located in the mandible; most classified as aggressive lesions (90%). Thirty-five per cent (7/20) of cases were either recurrent after prior treatment or progressive, while on other drug treatment. Objective tumour response rate was 100% after 12 months of treatment. Median PFS was 50.4 months (95% CI 38.0–62.8) with a cumulative PFS rate of 22.6% (95% CI 1.8–43.4) at 5 years follow-up. Median time to progression was 38.4 months (95% CI 26.0–50.8). Treatment was well tolerated, and none of the patients had to interrupt therapy for toxicity. Conclusion: High-dose denosumab is effective and safe in achieving a complete response in GCLJ within 12 months. The high long-term relapse rate after treatment cessation is the main obstacle for denosumab to become standard treatment for GCLJ

RANKL inhibition for giant cell lesions of the jaw: A retrospective cohort analysis

BACKGROUND: In all giant-cell-rich lesions (GCRL) occurring in bone, a common underlying excessive RANKL expression is held responsible for the osteolytic activity. Apart from giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB), systematic outcome analysis of RANKL inhibition in other GCRL is unavailable. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of a 1-year denosumab protocol in giant cell lesions of the jaw (GCLJ). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted compromising patients treated with a 1-year protocol of monthly subcutaneously administered 120 mg denosumab. Objective tumour response based on histology and imaging was used to calculate objective tumour response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and time to progression. Type, severity and frequency of adverse events were recorded in a standardised way to assess safety. RESULTS: Twenty patients, predominantly female (90%), were included. Fifty-five per cent of lesions were located in the mandible; most classified as aggressive lesions (90%). Thirty-five per cent (7/20) of cases were either recurrent after prior treatment or progressive, while on other drug treatment. Objective tumour response rate was 100% after 12 months of treatment. Median PFS was 50.4 months (95% CI 38.0-62.8) with a cumulative PFS rate of 22.6% (95% CI 1.8-43.4) at 5 years follow-up. Median time to progression was 38.4 months (95% CI 26.0-50.8). Treatment was well tolerated, and none of the patients had to interrupt therapy for toxicity. CONCLUSION: High-dose denosumab is effective and safe in achieving a complete response in GCLJ within 12 months. The high long-term relapse rate after treatment cessation is the main obstacle for denosumab to become standard treatment for GCLJ

Delirium detection using relative delta power based on 1 minute single-channel EEG : a multicentre study

Background: Delirium is frequently unrecognised. EEG shows slower frequencies (i.e. below 4 Hz) during delirium, which might be useful in improving delirium recognition. We studied the discriminative performance of a brief single-channel EEG recording for delirium detection in an independent cohort of patients. Methods: In this prospective, multicentre study, postoperative patients aged ≥60 yr were included (n=159). Before operation and during the first 3 postoperative days, patients underwent a 5-min EEG recording, followed by a video-recorded standardised cognitive assessment. Two or, in case of disagreement, three delirium experts classified each postoperative day based on the video and chart review. Relative delta power (1–4 Hz) was based on 1-min artifact-free EEG. The diagnostic value of the relative delta power was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), using the expert classification as the gold standard. Results: Experts classified 84 (23.3%) postoperative days as either delirium or possible delirium, and 276 (76.7%) non-delirium days. The AUROC of the relative EEG delta power was 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69–0.82]. Exploratory analysis showed that relative power from 1 to 6 Hz had significantly higher AUROC (0.78, 95% CI 0.72–0.84, P=0.014). Conclusions: Delirium/possible delirium can be detected in older postoperative patients based on a single-channel EEG recording that can be automatically analysed. This objective detection method with a continuous scale instead of a dichotomised outcome is a promising approach for routine detection of delirium. Clinical trial registration: NCT02404181

Delirium detection using relative delta power based on 1 minute single-channel EEG : a multicentre study

Background: Delirium is frequently unrecognised. EEG shows slower frequencies (i.e. below 4 Hz) during delirium, which might be useful in improving delirium recognition. We studied the discriminative performance of a brief single-channel EEG recording for delirium detection in an independent cohort of patients. Methods: In this prospective, multicentre study, postoperative patients aged ≥60 yr were included (n=159). Before operation and during the first 3 postoperative days, patients underwent a 5-min EEG recording, followed by a video-recorded standardised cognitive assessment. Two or, in case of disagreement, three delirium experts classified each postoperative day based on the video and chart review. Relative delta power (1–4 Hz) was based on 1-min artifact-free EEG. The diagnostic value of the relative delta power was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), using the expert classification as the gold standard. Results: Experts classified 84 (23.3%) postoperative days as either delirium or possible delirium, and 276 (76.7%) non-delirium days. The AUROC of the relative EEG delta power was 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69–0.82]. Exploratory analysis showed that relative power from 1 to 6 Hz had significantly higher AUROC (0.78, 95% CI 0.72–0.84, P=0.014). Conclusions: Delirium/possible delirium can be detected in older postoperative patients based on a single-channel EEG recording that can be automatically analysed. This objective detection method with a continuous scale instead of a dichotomised outcome is a promising approach for routine detection of delirium. Clinical trial registration: NCT02404181

Worldwide experience of homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: retrospective cohort study

Background: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a rare inherited disorder resulting in extremely elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Current guidance about its management and prognosis stems from small studies, mostly from high-income countries. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical and genetic characteristics, as well as the impact, of current practice on health outcomes of HoFH patients globally. Methods: The HoFH International Clinical Collaborators registry collected data on patients with a clinical, or genetic, or both, diagnosis of HoFH using a retrospective cohort study design. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04815005. Findings: Overall, 751 patients from 38 countries were included, with 565 (75%) reporting biallelic pathogenic variants. The median age of diagnosis was 12·0 years (IQR 5·5–27·0) years. Of the 751 patients, 389 (52%) were female and 362 (48%) were male. Race was reported for 527 patients; 338 (64%) patients were White, 121 (23%) were Asian, and 68 (13%) were Black or mixed race. The major manifestations of ASCVD or aortic stenosis were already present in 65 (9%) of patients at diagnosis of HoFH. Globally, pretreatment LDL cholesterol levels were 14·7 mmol/L (IQR 11·6–18·4). Among patients with detailed therapeutic information, 491 (92%) of 534 received statins, 342 (64%) of 534 received ezetimibe, and 243 (39%) of 621 received lipoprotein apheresis. On-treatment LDL cholesterol levels were lower in high-income countries (3·93 mmol/L, IQR 2·6–5·8) versus non-high-income countries (9·3 mmol/L, 6·7–12·7), with greater use of three or more lipid-lowering therapies (LLT; high-income 66% vs non-high-income 24%) and consequently more patients attaining guideline-recommended LDL cholesterol goals (high-income 21% vs non-high-income 3%). A first major adverse cardiovascular event occurred a decade earlier in non-high-income countries, at a median age of 24·5 years (IQR 17·0–34·5) versus 37·0 years (29·0–49·0) in high-income countries (adjusted hazard ratio 1·64, 95% CI 1·13–2·38). Interpretation: Worldwide, patients with HoFH are diagnosed too late, undertreated, and at high premature ASCVD risk. Greater use of multi-LLT regimens is associated with lower LDL cholesterol levels and better outcomes. Significant global disparities exist in treatment regimens, control of LDL cholesterol levels, and cardiovascular event-free survival, which demands a critical re-evaluation of global health policy to reduce inequalities and improve outcomes for all patients with HoFH

Worldwide experience of homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: retrospective cohort study

Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolaemia International Clinical Collaborators: Tycho R Tromp, Merel L Hartgers, G Kees Hovingh, Antonio J Vallejo-Vaz, Kausik K Ray, Handrean Soran, Tomas Freiberger, Stefano A Bertolini, Mariko Harada-Shiba, Jing Pang, Gerald F Watts, Susanne Greber-Platzer, Martin Mäser, Thomas M Stulnig, Christoph F Ebenbichler, Khalid Bin Thani, David Cassiman, Olivier S Descamps, Daisy Rymen, Peter Witters, Raul D Santos, Liam R Brunham, Gordon A Francis, Jacques Genest, Robert A Hegele, Brooke A Kennedy, Isabelle Ruel, Mark H Sherman, Long Jiang, Luya Wang, Željko Reiner, Vladimir Blaha, Richard Ceska, Jana Dvorakova, Lubomir Dlouhy, Pavel Horak, Vladimir Soska, Lukas Tichy, Robin Urbanek, Helena Vaverkova, Michal Vrablik, Stanislav Zemek, Lukas Zlatohlavek, Sameh Emil, Tarek Naguib, Ashraf Reda, Sophie Béliard, Eric Bruckert, Antonio Gallo, Moses S Elisaf, Genovefa Kolovou, Hofit Cohen, Ronen Durst, Eldad J Dann, Avishay Elis, Osama Hussein, Eran Leitersdorf, Daniel Schurr, Nitika Setia, Ishwar C Verma, Mohammed D Alareedh, Mutaz Al-Khnifsawi, Ali F Abdalsahib Al-Zamili, Sabah H Rhadi, Foaad K Shaghee, Marcello Arca, Maurizio Averna, Andrea Bartuli, Marco Bucci, Paola S Buonuomo, Paolo Calabrò, Sebastiano Calandra, Manuela Casula, Alberico L Catapano, Angelo B Cefalù, Arrigo F G Cicero, Sergio D'Addato, Laura D'Erasmo, Alessia Di Costanzo, Tommaso Fasano, Marta Gazzotti, Antonina Giammanco, Gabriella Iannuzzo, Anastasia Ibba, Emanuele A Negri, Andrea Pasta, Chiara Pavanello, Livia Pisciotta, Claudio Rabacchi, Carlo Ripoli, Tiziana Sampietro, Francesco Sbrana, Fulvio Sileo, Patrizia Suppressa, Patrizia Tarugi, Chiara Trenti, Maria G Zenti, Mika Hori, Mahmoud H Ayesh, Sami T Azar, Fadi F Bitar, Akl C Fahed, Elie M Moubarak, Georges Nemer, Hapizah M Nawawi, Ramón Madriz, Roopa Mehta, Arjen J Cupido, Joep C Defesche, M Doortje Reijman, Jeanine E Roeters-van Lennep, Erik S G Stroes, Albert Wiegman, Linda Zuurbier, Khalid Al-Waili, Fouzia Sadiq, Krzysztof Chlebus, Mafalda Bourbon, Isabel M Gaspar, Katarina S Lalic, Marat V Ezhov, Andrey V Susekov, Urh Groselj, Min-Ji Charng, Weerapan Khovidhunkit, Melih Aktan, Bulent B Altunkeser, Sinan Demircioglu, Melis Kose, Cumali Gokce, Osman Ilhan, Meral Kayikcioglu, Leyla G Kaynar, Irfan Kuku, Erdal Kurtoglu, Harika Okutan, Osman I Ozcebe, Zafer Pekkolay, Saim Sag, Osman Z Salcioglu, Ahmet Temizhan, Mustafa Yenercag, Mehmet Yilmaz, Hamiyet Yilmaz Yasar, Olena Mitchenko, Alexander R M Lyons, Christophe A T Stevens, Julie A Brothers, Lisa C Hudgins, Christina Nguyen, Rano Alieva, Aleksandr Shek, Doan-Loi Do, Ngoc-Thanh Kim, Hong-An Le, Thanh-Tung Le, Mai-Ngoc T Nguyen, Thanh-Huong Truong, Dirk J Blom, Frederick J Raal, Marina Cuchel.Background: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a rare inherited disorder resulting in extremely elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Current guidance about its management and prognosis stems from small studies, mostly from high-income countries. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical and genetic characteristics, as well as the impact, of current practice on health outcomes of HoFH patients globally. Methods: The HoFH International Clinical Collaborators registry collected data on patients with a clinical, or genetic, or both, diagnosis of HoFH using a retrospective cohort study design. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04815005. Findings: Overall, 751 patients from 38 countries were included, with 565 (75%) reporting biallelic pathogenic variants. The median age of diagnosis was 12·0 years (IQR 5·5-27·0) years. Of the 751 patients, 389 (52%) were female and 362 (48%) were male. Race was reported for 527 patients; 338 (64%) patients were White, 121 (23%) were Asian, and 68 (13%) were Black or mixed race. The major manifestations of ASCVD or aortic stenosis were already present in 65 (9%) of patients at diagnosis of HoFH. Globally, pretreatment LDL cholesterol levels were 14·7 mmol/L (IQR 11·6-18·4). Among patients with detailed therapeutic information, 491 (92%) of 534 received statins, 342 (64%) of 534 received ezetimibe, and 243 (39%) of 621 received lipoprotein apheresis. On-treatment LDL cholesterol levels were lower in high-income countries (3·93 mmol/L, IQR 2·6-5·8) versus non-high-income countries (9·3 mmol/L, 6·7-12·7), with greater use of three or more lipid-lowering therapies (LLT; high-income 66% vs non-high-income 24%) and consequently more patients attaining guideline-recommended LDL cholesterol goals (high-income 21% vs non-high-income 3%). A first major adverse cardiovascular event occurred a decade earlier in non-high-income countries, at a median age of 24·5 years (IQR 17·0-34·5) versus 37·0 years (29·0-49·0) in high-income countries (adjusted hazard ratio 1·64, 95% CI 1·13-2·38). Interpretation: Worldwide, patients with HoFH are diagnosed too late, undertreated, and at high premature ASCVD risk. Greater use of multi-LLT regimens is associated with lower LDL cholesterol levels and better outcomes. Significant global disparities exist in treatment regimens, control of LDL cholesterol levels, and cardiovascular event-free survival, which demands a critical re-evaluation of global health policy to reduce inequalities and improve outcomes for all patients with HoFH.Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center; Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; and European Atherosclerosis Society.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio