Economic burden of Cardiac Arrest in Spain: analyzing healthcare costs drivers and treatment strategies cost-effectiveness

Carga económica; Parada cardíaca; RentabilidadEconomic burden; Cardiac arrest; Cost-effectivenessCàrrega econòmica; Aturada cardíaca; RendibilitatBackground Cardiac arrest is a major public health issue in Europe. Cardiac arrest seems to be associated with a large socioeconomic burden in terms of resource utilization and health care costs. The aim of this study is the analysis of the economic burden of cardiac arrest in Spain and a cost-effectiveness analysis of the key intervention identified, especially in relation to neurological outcome at discharge. Methods The data comes from the information provided by 115 intensive care and cardiology units from Spain, including information on the care of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who had a return of spontaneous circulation. The information reported by theses 115 units was collected by a nationwide survey conducted between March and September 2020. Along with number of patients (2631), we also collect information about the structure of the units, temperature management, and prognostication assessments. In this study we analyze the potential association of several factors with neurological outcome at discharge, and the cost associated with the different factors. The cost-effectiveness of using servo-control for temperature management is analyzed by means of a decision model, based on the results of the survey and data collected in the literature, for a one-year and a lifetime time horizon. Results A total of 109 cardiology units provided results on neurological outcome at discharge as evaluated with the cerebral performance category (CPC). The most relevant factor associated with neurological outcome at discharge was ‘servo-control use’, showing a 12.8% decrease in patients with unfavorable neurological outcomes (i.e., CPC3-4 vs. CPC1-2). The total cost per patient (2020 Euros) was €73,502. Only “servo-control use” was associated with an increased mean total cost per hospital. Patients treated with servo-control for temperature management gained in the short term (1 year) an average of 0.039 QALYs over those who were treated with other methods at an increased cost of €70.8, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 1,808 euros. For a lifetime time horizon, the use of servo-control is both more effective and less costly than the alternative. Conclusions Our results suggest the implementation of servo-control techniques in all the units that are involved in managing the cardiac arrest patient from admission until discharge from hospital to minimize the neurological damage to patients and to reduce costs to the health and social security system

Dynamics of Emergency Cardiovascular Hospital Admissions and In-Hospital Mortality During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Time Series Analysis and Impact of Socioeconomic Factors

COVID-19; Síndrome coronario agudo; Insuficiencia cardiacaCOVID-19; Síndrome coronària aguda; Insuficiència cardíacaCOVID-19; Acute coronary syndrome; Heart failureAims: This study aimed to evaluate the decline in urgent cardiovascular hospital admissions and in-hospital mortality during the COVID pandemic in two successive waves, and to evaluate differences by sex, age, and deprivation index subgroups. Methods and Results: We obtained acute cardiovascular hospital episodes during the years 2019–2020 from region-wide data on public healthcare usage for the population of Catalonia (North-East Spain). We fitted time models to estimate the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and acute heart failure (HF) admissions during the first pandemic wave, the between-waves period, and the second wave compared with the corresponding pre-COVID-19 periods and to test for the interaction with sex, age, and area-based socioeconomic level. We evaluated the effect of COVID-19 period on in-hospital mortality. ACS (n = 8,636) and HF (n = 27,566) episodes were defined using primary diagnostic ICD-10 codes. ACS and HF admissions decreased during the first wave (IRR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.58–0.76 and IRR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.55–0.68, respectively) and during the second wave (IRR = 0.80, 95%CI: 0.72–0.88 and IRR = 0.76, 95%CI: 0.69–0.84, respectively); acute HF admissions also decreased in the period between waves (IRR: 0.81, 95%CI: 0.74–0.89). The impact was similar in all sex and socioeconomic subgroups and was higher in older patients with ACS. In-hospital mortality was higher than expected only during the first wave. Conclusion: During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a marked decline in urgent cardiovascular hospital admissions that were attenuated during the second wave. Both the decline and the attenuation of the effect have been similar in all subgroups regardless of age, sex, or socioeconomic status. In-hospital mortality for ACS and HF episodes increased during the first wave, but not during the second wave.This study was funded with a grant from Sociedad Española de Cardiología y Fundación Española del Corazón (SEC/FEC-INV-CLI 21/017). The funder had no role in the study development

Coronary Artery Disease and Prognosis of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Our aim was to determine the prognostic impact of coronary artery disease (CAD) on heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) mortality and readmissions. From a prospective multicenter registry that included 1831 patients hospitalized due to heart failure, 583 had a left ventricular ejection fraction of <40%. In total, 266 patients (45.6%) had coronary artery disease as main etiology and 137 (23.5%) had idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and they are the focus of this study. Significant differences were found in Charlson index (CAD 4.4 ± 2.8, idiopathic DCM 2.9 ± 2.4, p < 0.001), and in the number of previous hospitalizations (1.1 ± 1, 0.8 ± 1.2, respectively, p = 0.015). One-year mortality was similar in the two groups: idiopathic DCM (hazard ratio [HR] = 1), CAD (HR 1.50; 95% CI 0.83-2.70, p = 0.182). Mortality/readmissions were also comparable: CAD (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.64-1.41, p = 0.81). Patients with idiopathic DCM had a higher probability of receiving a heart transplant than those with CAD (HR 4.6; 95% CI 1.4-13.4, p = 0.012). The prognosis of HFrEF is similar in patients with CAD etiology and in those with idiopathic DCM. Patients with idiopathic DCM were more prone to receive heart transplant.This research was funded by CIBERCV I and supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. L.V. is funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain (CM20/00104 and ).S

Association of Beta-Blockers with Survival on Patients Presenting with ACS Treated with PCI: A Propensity Score Analysis from the BleeMACS Registry

Purpose: The aim was to evaluate prognostic value of beta-blocker (BB) administration in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients in the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) era. Methods and Results: The BleeMACS project is a multicenter, observational, retrospective registry enrolling patients with ACS worldwide in 15 hospitals. Patients discharged with BB therapy were compared to those discharged without a BB before and after propensity score with matching. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital reinfarction, in-hospital heart failure, 1-year myocardial infarction, 1-year bleeding and 1-year composite of death and recurrent myocardial infarction. After matching, 2935 patients for each group were enrolled. The primary endpoint of 1-year death was significantly lower in the group on BB therapy (4.5 vs 7%, p < 0.05), while only a trend was noted for recurrent acute myocardial infarction (4.5 vs 4.9%, p = 0.54). These results were consistent for patients older than 80 years of age, for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, and for those discharged with complete versus incomplete revascularization, but not for non-STEMI/unstable angina patients. Conclusions: BB therapy was related to 1-year lower risk of all-cause mortality, independently from completeness of revascularization, admission diagnosis, age and ejection fraction. Randomized controlled trials for patients treated with PCI for ACS should be performed

Complete versus culprit-only strategy in older MI patients with multivessel disease

Aims The revascularization strategy to pursue in older myocardial infarction (MI) patients with multivessel disease (MVD) is currently unknown. For this reason, while waiting for the results of dedicated trials, we sought to compare a complete versus a culprit-only strategy in older MI patients by merging data from four registries. Methods and results The inclusion criteria for the target population of the present study were (i) age &gt;= 75 years; (ii) MI (STE or NSTE); (iii) MVD; (iv) successful treatment of culprit lesion. Propensity scores (PS) were derived using logistic regression (backward stepwise selection, p &lt; 0.2). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular (CV) death, MI, and major bleeding. Multivariable adjustment included the PS and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). The Kaplan-Meier plots were weighted for IPT. Among 2087 patients included, 1362 (65%) received culprit-only treatment whereas 725 (35%) complete revascularization. The mean age was 81.5 years, while the mean follow-up was 419 +/- 284 days. Seventy-four patients (10%) died in the complete group and 223 in the culprit-only one (16%). The adjusted cumulative 1-year mortality was 9.7% in the complete and 12.9% in the culprit-only group (adjusted HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.50-0.89). Complete revascularization was associated with lower incidence of CV death (adjusted HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.48-0.95) and MI (adjusted HR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.95). Conclusions Culprit-only is the default strategy in older MI patients with MVD. In our analysis, complete revascularization was associated with lower all-cause and CV mortality and with a lower MI rate

Recomanacions per a l’organització del tractament del xoc cardiogènic a Catalunya: via xoc

Xoc cardiogènic; Tractament; Via xocCardiogenic shock; Treatment; Via xoc;Choque cardiogénico; Tratamiento; Via xocEl xoc cardiogènic (XC) és una situació de baix cabal cardíac que s’associa a hipoperfusió i fallida orgànica multisistèmica. La causa més freqüent és l’infart agut de miocardi amb disfunció greu del ventricle esquerre. Els avenços en la teràpia de reperfusió han millorat la supervivència del XC, però la mortalitat intrahospitalària continua sent elevada (al voltant del 50%). Els sistemes coordinats regionals d’atenció mèdica, associats a algorismes de tractament comuns, han millorat la supervivència en patologies agudes greus en què el pronòstic és dependent del temps (infart agut de miocardi [IAM], accident vascular cerebral, aturada cardíaca extrahospitalària, politraumatisme). Aplicar una estratègia similar adaptada al XC podria tenir un efecte similar en la seva supervivència.Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a situation of low cardiac output that is associated with hypoperfusion and multisystemic organ failure. The most common cause is acute myocardial infarction with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Advances in reperfusion therapy have improved CS survival, but in-hospital mortality remains high (around 50%). Coordinated regional health care systems, associated with common treatment algorithms, have improved survival in severe acute conditions in which the prognosis is time-dependent (acute myocardial infarction [AMI], stroke, outpatient cardiac arrest, polytrauma). Applying a similar strategy adapted to the CS could have a similar effect on its survival.El shock cardiogénico (SC) es una situación de bajo gasto cardíaco que se asocia a hipoperfusión y quiebra orgánica multisistémica. La causa más frecuente es el infarto agudo de miocardio con disfunción grave del ventrículo izquierdo. Los avances en la terapia de reperfusión han mejorado la supervivencia del SC, pero la mortalidad intrahospitalaria sigue siendo elevada (alrededor del 50%). Los sistemas coordinados regionales de atención médica, asociados a algoritmos de tratamiento comunes, han mejorado la supervivencia en patologías agudas graves en que el pronóstico es dependiente del tiempo (infarto agudo de miocardio [IAM], accidente vascular cerebral, paro cardíaco extrahospitalaria, politraumatismo). Aplicar una estrategia similar adaptada al SC podría tener un efecto similar en su supervivencia

Impact of triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in real-world practice

The optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC) after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains debated. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OAC plus clopidogrel with or without aspirin in a real-world setting. We retrospectively analyzed data from an international, multi-center registry between 2003 and 2014 (n = 15,401). Patients with ACS and receiving OAC after PCI were screened. The composite primary endpoint was 1-year all-cause death, re-infarction, or severe bleeding. The final analysis enrolled 642 patients including 62 patients (9.7%) with OAC and clopidogrel (dual therapy), and 580 patients (90.3%) with the combination of aspirin, OAC and clopidogrel (triple therapy). Patients on triple therapy were more often female and were more likely to have comorbidities. There was no significant difference regarding the primary end point between dual therapy with triple therapy patients [17.74% vs. 17.24%; unadjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.035; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.556-1.929; adjusted HR: 1.026; 95% CI: 0.544-1.937]. However, the re-infarction rate was significantly higher in dual therapy than triple therapy patients (14.52% vs. 5.34%; unadjusted HR: 2.807; 95% CI: 1.329-5.928; adjusted HR: 2.333; 95% CI: 1.078-5.047). In addition, there was no difference between two regimes in all-cause death and severe bleeding. In real-life patients with ACS following PCI and with an indication of OAC, triple therapy was not associated with an increased rate of adverse outcomes compared to dual therapy. Moreover, it decreased risk of re-infarction and did not increase risk of severe bleedin

BleeMACS: rationale and design of the study

Bleeding events after an acute coronary syndrome have a negative impact on prognosis. Available risk scores are limited by suboptimal accuracy, prediction of only in-hospital events and absence of patients treated with new antiplatelet agents in the current era of widespread use of percutaneous coronary intervention. The BleeMACS (Bleeding complications in a Multicenter registry of patients discharged after an Acute Coronary Syndrome) project is a multicenter investigator-initiated international retrospective registry that enrolled more than 15 000 patients discharged with a definitive diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome and treated with percutaneous revascularization. The primary end point is the incidence of major bleeding events requiring hospitalization and/or red cell transfusion concentrates within 1 year. An integer risk score for bleeding within the first year after hospital discharge will be developed from a multivariate competing-risks regression. The BleeMACS registry collaborative will allow development and validation of a risk score for prediction of major bleeding during follow-up for patients receiving contemporary therapies for acute coronary syndrom