Emergency care re-attendance for acute childhood asthma in a low-resource setting: The Childhood Asthma Re-attendance Assessment (CARA) Study

Background Asthma is a public health problem in Latin America, where asthmatic children are mainly treated at emergency rooms during acute attacks. These attacks result in loss of lung function and quality of life for the asthmatic child and family, risk of death and high direct and indirect economic costs. In order to improve paediatric asthma management in Esmeraldas, Ecuador, we aimed to identify predictors of recurrent asthma attacks requiring emergency care and to explore the caregivers’ (CGs) and health care workers’ (HCWs) perceptions of barriers and facilitators to asthma health and home care access. Methods First, a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies analysing predictors for emergency department (ED) re-attendance or hospital readmission for acute asthma in children was performed. Second, a prospective cohort study of children treated for an asthma attack at an emergency room in Esmeraldas, Ecuador, was undertaken to define the characteristics of these children, determine the rate of ED re-attendance for acute asthma and identify the predictors for this to occur. Third, a qualitative study to explore acute asthma significance and perceived barriers and facilitators for health and home care access from the asthmatic children’s CGs’ and HCWs’ perspective was performed. Results In both the meta-analysis and prospective cohort study, children of a younger age and a history of severe asthma attacks during the previous year were at a greater risk of ED re-attendance for acute asthma. Forty six percent of the children recruited during the prospective cohort suffered a subsequent asthma attack requiring emergency care in the following 6 months. Other identified predictors of ED re-attendance for acute asthma were: existing asthma diagnosis (AOR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.19-3.94; AHR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.15-2.39); food triggers (AOR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.11-3.55); existing eczema diagnosis (AOR: 4.22, 95% CI 1.02-17.54); and urban residence as protective (AHR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.50-0.95). Twelve HCWs and 20 CGs participated in the in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, expressing a differing significance of asthma attacks. This difference was also observed between experienced and inexperienced HCWs. Multiple barriers and several facilitators were identified by HCWs and CGs that affect health and home care access for asthmatic children. When shown the predictors of ED-reattendance for acute asthma combined in a risk-assessment tool, both HCWs and CGs reported finding the tool easy to use and understand, as well as a useful aid in the decision-making process concerning asthma treatment and follow-up. Conclusion A combination of several question-based predictors may result in an effective and simple risk-assessment tool to be used at the ED to identify asthmatic children at a higher risk of recurrent severe asthma attacks. Increasing CGs’ and HCWs’ asthma knowledge as well as HCWs’ communication skills, to establish a patient centred approach with a shared decision-making process could mean a difference in the quality of the asthma care in this setting. The use of the described recurrent risk assessment tool could prove useful in this process, as reported by the participants in this study

Shape your career: Opportunities for Early Career Members in 2022 and the experience of applying for an ERS fellowship

In this article, we present the @EuroRespSoc opportunities for ECMs (@EarlyCareerERS) in the upcoming year and describe the experience of applying for an ERS Fellowship, with the key steps and challenges identified.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Age and body mass index affect fit of spirometry Global Lung Function Initiative references in schoolchildren

BACKGROUND: References from the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) are widely used to interpret children's spirometry results. We assessed fit for healthy schoolchildren. METHODS: LuftiBus in the School was a population-based cross-sectional study undertaken in 2013-2016 in the canton of Zurich, Switzerland. Parents and their children aged 6-17 years answered questionnaires about respiratory symptoms and lifestyle. Children underwent spirometry in a mobile lung function lab. We calculated GLI-based z-scores for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV$_{1}$), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV$_{1}$/FVC and forced expiratory flow for 25-75% of FVC (FEF$_{25-75}$) for healthy White participants. We defined appropriate fit to GLI references by mean values between +0.5 and -0.5 z-scores. We assessed whether fit varied by age, body mass index, height and sex using linear regression models. RESULTS: We analysed data from 2036 children with valid FEV$_{1}$ measurements, of whom 1762 also had valid FVC measurements. The median age was 12.2 years. Fit was appropriate for children aged 6-11 years for all indices. In adolescents aged 12-17 years, fit was appropriate for FEV$_{1}$/FVC z-scores (mean±sd -0.09±1.02), but not for FEV$_{1}$ (-0.62±0.98), FVC (-0.60±0.98) and FEF$_{25-75}$ (-0.54±1.02). Mean FEV$_{1}$, FVC and FEF$_{25-75}$ z-scores fitted better in children considered overweight (-0.25, -0.13 and -0.38, respectively) than normal weight (-0.55, -0.50 and -0.55, respectively; p-trend <0.001, 0.014 and <0.001, respectively). FEV$_{1}$, FVC and FEF$_{25-75}$ z-scores depended on both age and height (p-interaction 0.033, 0.019 and <0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: GLI-based FEV$_{1}$, FVC, and FEF$_{25-75}$ z-scores do not fit White Swiss adolescents well. This should be considered when using reference equations for clinical decision-making, research and international comparison

Age and body mass index affect fit of spirometry Global Lung Function Initiative references in schoolchildren.

Background References from the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) are widely used to interpret children's spirometry results. We assessed fit for healthy schoolchildren. Methods LuftiBus in the School was a population-based cross-sectional study undertaken in 2013-2016 in the canton of Zurich, Switzerland. Parents and their children aged 6-17 years answered questionnaires about respiratory symptoms and lifestyle. Children underwent spirometry in a mobile lung function lab. We calculated GLI-based z-scores for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC and forced expiratory flow for 25-75% of FVC (FEF25-75) for healthy White participants. We defined appropriate fit to GLI references by mean values between +0.5 and -0.5 z-scores. We assessed whether fit varied by age, body mass index, height and sex using linear regression models. Results We analysed data from 2036 children with valid FEV1 measurements, of whom 1762 also had valid FVC measurements. The median age was 12.2 years. Fit was appropriate for children aged 6-11 years for all indices. In adolescents aged 12-17 years, fit was appropriate for FEV1/FVC z-scores (mean±sd -0.09±1.02), but not for FEV1 (-0.62±0.98), FVC (-0.60±0.98) and FEF25-75 (-0.54±1.02). Mean FEV1, FVC and FEF25-75 z-scores fitted better in children considered overweight (-0.25, -0.13 and -0.38, respectively) than normal weight (-0.55, -0.50 and -0.55, respectively; p-trend <0.001, 0.014 and <0.001, respectively). FEV1, FVC and FEF25-75 z-scores depended on both age and height (p-interaction 0.033, 0.019 and <0.001, respectively). Conclusion GLI-based FEV1, FVC, and FEF25-75 z-scores do not fit White Swiss adolescents well. This should be considered when using reference equations for clinical decision-making, research and international comparison

Phenotypic characteristics, healthcare use, and treatment in children with night cough compared with children with wheeze

Objectives: Population‐based studies of children with dry night cough alone compared with those who also wheeze are few and inconclusive. We compared how children with dry night cough differ from those who wheeze. Methods: LuftiBus in the school is a population‐based study of schoolchildren conducted between 2013 and 2016 in Zurich, Switzerland. We divided children into four mutually exclusive groups based on reported dry night cough (henceforth referred as “cough”) and wheeze and compared parent‐reported symptoms, comorbidities, exposures, FeNO, spirometry, and healthcare use and treatment. Results: Among 3457 schoolchildren aged 6–17 years, 294 (9%) reported “cough,” 181 (5%) reported “wheeze,” 100 (3%) reported “wheeze and cough,” and 2882 (83%) were “asymptomatic.” Adjusting for confounders in a multinomial regression, children with “cough” reported more frequent colds, rhinitis, and snoring than “asymptomatic” children; children with “wheeze” or “wheeze and cough” more often reported hay fever, eczema, and parental histories of asthma. FeNO and spirometry were similar among “asymptomatic” and children with “cough,” while children with “wheeze” or “wheeze and cough” had higher FeNO and evidence of bronchial obstruction. Children with “cough” used healthcare less often than those with “wheeze,” and they attended mainly primary care. Twenty‐two children (7% of those with “cough”) reported a physician diagnosis of asthma and used inhalers. These had similar characteristics as children with wheeze. Conclusion: Our representative population‐based study confirms that children with dry night cough without wheeze clearly differed from those with wheeze. This suggests asthma is unlikely, and they should be investigated for alternative aetiologies, particularly upper airway disease

Phenotypic characteristics, healthcare use, and treatment in children with night cough compared with children with wheeze.

OBJECTIVES Population-based studies of children with dry night cough alone compared with those who also wheeze are few and inconclusive. We compared how children with dry night cough differ from those who wheeze. METHODS LuftiBus in the school is a population-based study of schoolchildren conducted between 2013 and 2016 in Zurich, Switzerland. We divided children into four mutually exclusive groups based on reported dry night cough (henceforth referred as "cough") and wheeze and compared parent-reported symptoms, comorbidities, exposures, FeNO, spirometry, and healthcare use and treatment. RESULTS Among 3457 schoolchildren aged 6-17 years, 294 (9%) reported "cough," 181 (5%) reported "wheeze," 100 (3%) reported "wheeze and cough," and 2882 (83%) were "asymptomatic." Adjusting for confounders in a multinomial regression, children with "cough" reported more frequent colds, rhinitis, and snoring than "asymptomatic" children; children with "wheeze" or "wheeze and cough" more often reported hay fever, eczema, and parental histories of asthma. FeNO and spirometry were similar among "asymptomatic" and children with "cough," while children with "wheeze" or "wheeze and cough" had higher FeNO and evidence of bronchial obstruction. Children with "cough" used healthcare less often than those with "wheeze," and they attended mainly primary care. Twenty-two children (7% of those with "cough") reported a physician diagnosis of asthma and used inhalers. These had similar characteristics as children with wheeze. CONCLUSION Our representative population-based study confirms that children with dry night cough without wheeze clearly differed from those with wheeze. This suggests asthma is unlikely, and they should be investigated for alternative aetiologies, particularly upper airway disease

Agreement of parent- and child-reported wheeze and its association with measurable asthma traits

Objectives In epidemiological studies, childhood asthma is usually assessed with questionnaires directed at parents or children, and these may give different answers. We studied how well parents and children agreed when asked to report symptoms of wheeze and investigated whose answers were closer to measurable traits of asthma. Methods LuftiBus in the school is a cross-sectional survey of respiratory health among Swiss schoolchildren aged 6–17 years. We applied questionnaires to parents and children asking about wheeze and exertional wheeze in the past year. We assessed agreement between parent–child answers with Cohen's kappa (k), and associations of answers from children and parents with fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s over forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), using quantile regression. Results We received questionnaires from 3079 children and their parents. Agreement was poor for reported wheeze (k = 0.37) and exertional wheeze (k = 0.36). Median FeNO varied when wheeze was reported by children (19 ppb, interquartile range [IQR]: 9–44), parents (22 ppb, IQR: 12–46), both (31 ppb, IQR: 16–55), or neither (11 ppb, IQR: 7–19). Median absolute FEV1/FVC was the same when wheeze was reported by children (84%, IQR: 78–89) and by parents (84%, IQR: 78–89), lower when reported by both (82%, IQR: 78–87), and higher when reported by neither (87%, IQR: 82–91). For exertional wheeze findings were similar. Results did not differ by age or sex. Conclusion Our findings suggest that surveying both parents and children and combining their responses can help us to better identify children with measurable asthma traits

Prevalence of childhood cough in epidemiological studies depends on the question used: findings from two population-based studies.

BACKGROUND Epidemiological studies use different questions to assess recurrent cough in children. In two independent population-based studies, we assessed how prevalence estimates of cough vary depending on the questions parents are asked about their child's cough and how answers to the different questions overlap. METHODS We analysed cross-sectional data from two population-based studies on respiratory health: LuftiBus in the School (LUIS), conducted in 2013-2016 among 6- to 17-year-school children in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland, and the 1998 Leicester Respiratory Cohort (LRC) study, UK where we used data from 6- to 8-year-old children from the 2003 follow-up survey. Both studies used parental questionnaires that included the same three questions on the child's cough, namely cough without a cold, dry cough at night and coughing more than others. We assessed how the prevalence of cough varied depending on the question and how answers to the different questions on cough overlapped. We also assessed how results were influenced by age, sex, presence of wheeze and parental education. RESULTS We included 3457 children aged 6-17 years from LUIS and 2100 children aged 6-8 years from LRC. All respiratory outcomes - cough, wheeze and physician-diagnosed asthma - were reported twice as often in the LRC as in LUIS. We found large differences in the prevalence of parent-reported cough between the three cough questions. In LUIS, 880 (25%) parents reported cough without a cold, 394 (11%) dry night cough, and 159 (5%) reported that their child coughed more than other children. In the LRC, these numbers were 1003 (48%), 527 (25%) and 227 (11%). There was only partial overlap of answers, with 89 (3%) answering yes to all questions in LUIS and 168 (8%) in LRC. Prevalence of all types of cough and overlap between the cough questions was higher in children with current wheeze. CONCLUSION In both population-based studies prevalence estimates of cough depended strongly on the question used to assess cough with only partial overlap of responses to different questions. Epidemiological studies on cough can only be compared if they used exactly the same questions for cough

Prevalence of childhood cough in epidemiological studies depends on the question used: findings from two population-based studies

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies use different questions to assess recurrent cough in children. In two independent population-based studies, we assessed how prevalence estimates of cough vary depending on the questions parents are asked about their child’s cough and how answers to the different questions overlap. METHODS: We analysed cross-sectional data from two population-based studies on respiratory health: LuftiBus in the School (LUIS), conducted in 2013-2016 among 6- to 17-year-school children in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland, and the 1998 Leicester Respiratory Cohort (LRC) study, UK where we used data from 6- to 8-year-old children from the 2003 follow-up survey. Both studies used parental questionnaires that included the same three questions on the child’s cough, namely cough without a cold, dry cough at night and coughing more than others. We assessed how the prevalence of cough varied depending on the question and how answers to the different questions on cough overlapped. We also assessed how results were influenced by age, sex, presence of wheeze and parental education. RESULTS: We included 3457 children aged 6–17 years from LUIS and 2100 children aged 6–8 years from LRC. All respiratory outcomes – cough, wheeze and physician-diagnosed asthma – were reported twice as often in the LRC as in LUIS. We found large differences in the prevalence of parent-reported cough between the three cough questions. In LUIS, 880 (25%) parents reported cough without a cold, 394 (11%) dry night cough, and 159 (5%) reported that their child coughed more than other children. In the LRC, these numbers were 1003 (48%), 527 (25%) and 227 (11%). There was only partial overlap of answers, with 89 (3%) answering yes to all questions in LUIS and 168 (8%) in LRC. Prevalence of all types of cough and overlap between the cough questions was higher in children with current wheeze. CONCLUSION: In both population-based studies prevalence estimates of cough depended strongly on the question used to assess cough with only partial overlap of responses to different questions. Epidemiological studies on cough can only be compared if they used exactly the same questions for cough

Predictors of asthma control differ from predictors of asthma attacks in children: The Swiss Paediatric Airway Cohort.

BACKGROUND It is unclear if predictors of asthma attacks are the same as those of asthma symptom control in children. OBJECTIVE We evaluated predictors for these two outcomes in a clinical cohort study. METHODS The Swiss Paediatric Airway Cohort (SPAC) is a multicentre prospective clinical cohort of children referred to paediatric pulmonologists. This analysis included 516 children (5-16 years old) diagnosed with asthma. At baseline, we collected sociodemographic information, symptoms, personal and family history and environmental exposures from a parental baseline questionnaire, and treatment and test results from hospital records. Outcomes were assessed 1 year later by parental questionnaire: asthma control in the last 4 weeks as defined by GINA guidelines, and asthma attacks defined as any unscheduled visit for asthma in the past year. We used logistic regression to identify and compare predictors for suboptimal asthma control and asthma attacks. RESULTS At follow-up, 114/516 children (22%), reported suboptimal asthma control, and 114 (22%) an incident asthma attack. Only 37 (7%) reported both. Suboptimal asthma control was associated with poor symptom control at baseline (e.g. ≥1 night wheeze/week OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.7-6), wheeze triggered by allergens (2.2; 1.4-3.3), colds (2.3; 1.4-3.6) and exercise (3.2; 2-5), a more intense treatment at baseline (2.4; 1.3-4.4 for Step 3 vs. 1), history of preschool (2.6; 1.5-4.4) and persistent wheeze (2; 1.4-3.2), and exposure to tobacco smoke (1.7; 1-2.6). Incident asthma attacks were associated with previous episodes of severe wheeze (2; 1.2-3.3) and asthma attacks (2.8; 1.6-5 for emergency care visits), younger age (0.8; 0.8-0.9 per 1 year) and non-Swiss origin (0.3; 0.2-0.5 for Swiss origin). Lung function, exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and allergic sensitization at baseline were not associated with control or attacks. CONCLUSION Children at risk of long-term suboptimal asthma control differ from those at risk of attacks. Prediction tools and preventive efforts should differentiate these two asthma outcomes