7 research outputs found

    Methodological concept of decision making support tool for the purpose of long-term energy planning

    No full text
    Formulation of long-term energy strategies and polices is a complex tasks. It needs to consider number of aspects i.a. forecast of energy and fuel demand, possible supply paths, expected impact on environment, as well as public consultation process. There are number of formal methods that aim supporting decision making for the long-term energy planning. They help understanding complexity of problem, finding the best compromise solution and allow public participation. In the following paper methodological concept of combining energy scenarios and multi-criteria analysis (MCA) will be introduced. Energy scenarios are tools that help to explore and understand the future energy system. MCA provides assessment of different policy option in respect to multiple criteria. Moreover it allows public participation in decision making process. Combined method is promising tool for energy planning and decision

    How to optimize lifetime, quality and energy yield of photovoltaic modules: a regulatory approach based on a techno-economic-environmental assessment

    Get PDF
    The ‘European Green Deal’ attributes a pivotal role to the decarbonisation of the EU energy system in order to reach climate objectives in 2030 and 2050. Photovoltaic energy (PV), among the plethora of renewable energies, can greatly contribute to EU energy system transition. A recent study carried out by the Joint Research Centre shows that, inter alia, the yield, quality and long-term performance of PV modules present an improvement potential, which could be tackled by means of regulatory instruments, such as the Ecodesign Directive and the Energy Labelling Regulation. In standardisation terms, the durability of a product, intended as an estimator of its technical lifetime, can be defined as the ‘ability to function as required, until a limiting state is reached’. The PV modules have a typical annual degradation rate of 0.8%-1%, which leads to 80% of the initial nameplate rating at 20-25 years
    corecore