An ANP approach for the stakeholder analysis in participatory environmental management. The case of Spanish wetland La Albufera

Trabajo presentado al International Symposium of the Analytic Hierarchy Process celebrado en washington (US) del 29 de junio al 2 de julio de 2014.The aim of this paper is to analyze the influence of the stakeholders in a participatory decision making process. For that, the relationships and influences among stakeholders involved in a specific environmental problem, namely rice straw management in the Natural Park of La Albufera, Valencia (Spain), have been studied using an Analytic Network Process approach. The main question we set is how to measure the influence among stakeholders. This a complex question in a real life problem, due to the difficulty for a stakeholder to answer the direct question: Who do you think exerts more influence on you when you have to solve a problem? In this work, we present a case study assuming that the information exchange is the way to measure the influence among the individuals in the network. We will use these data to solve an easy ANP model. This model is a first approach to prove the utility of ANP to measure the influences among stakeholders in a Social Network.N

An in-depth analysis of a TTO's objectives alignment within the university strategy: An ANP-based approach

[EN] This paper presents the application of the Analytic Network Process for the analysis of the contribution of the third mission action plans to the research transfer policies set by the University Governing Body. The model is applied to the case study of the Technology Transfer Offices (TTO) of the Universitat Politècnica de València (Spain). The paper develops a rigorous decision-making tool that helps TTO managers analyse the effectiveness of TTO activities and their degree of alignment with the institution¿s objectives. This work considers TTO managers¿ qualitative information and value judgments about the activities performed.This work has been funded by Universitat Politecnica de Valencia PAID-06-2011/2042. The translation of this paper has been funded by the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia.Aragonés-Beltrán, P.; Poveda Bautista, R.; Jiménez-Sáez, F. (2017). An in-depth analysis of a TTO's objectives alignment within the university strategy: An ANP-based approach. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 44:19-43. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2017.03.002S19434

How to assess stakeholders' influence in project management? A proposal based on the Analytic Network Process

[EN] In this paper we present a methodology to measure stakeholders' influences within a project from the point of view of the Project Manager. It is a novel proposal for the definition of "influence" among stakeholders based on a multiperspective approach. The concept of influence is broken down into criteria, evaluating different aspects that together define an index which measures the influence of each stakeholder with respect to the rest of the project team. This index is calculated with the Analytic Network Process. The methodology has been applied to a maintenance project for the Spanish National Railway Infrastructure company. Results show that the most influential stakeholders are the Contractor and the Signaling systems provider accounting for 40% of the total influence. These results have helped the Project Manager to be aware of the two most influential stakeholders and set the guidelines for the stakeholder management in the future.Aragonés-Beltrán, P.; García-Melón, M.; Montesinos-Valera, J. (2017). How to assess stakeholders' influence in project management? A proposal based on the Analytic Network Process. International Journal of Project Management. 35(3):451-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.001S45146235

Selección de mercados para la exportación intracomunitaria de alcachofa en conserva mediante técnicas de decisión multicriterio discretas. Estudio comparativo

Trabajo presentado al XVI Congreso Internacional de Ingeniería de Proyectos (AEIPRO), celebrado en Valencia (España) del 11 al 13 de julio de 2012.[EN]: The object of this study is to determine the priorities for export and introduction into European Union countries canned the product of artichoke, specifically established as alternatives, Germany, France and Italy, in the case of Germany for its growing import market, and France and Italy, for its great tradition in the consumption of artichoke. The company is engaged in the manufacture of canned vegetables, for the study were taken into account the current economic situation affecting the European economic community and that will be vital for proper prioritization of the different alternatives. After identification and selection and appointment of expert decision maker down the 27 criteria, such as income per capita, dynamic import and consumption of canned artichokes, which are included within the following groups: 1) intra-Community transactions, 2)target market environment, 3) economic situation, 4) consumer Tradition, 5) Quality and environmental processes, 6) product Quality required.[ES]: En el contexto económico actual, las empresas dedicadas a la producción agrícola tienen que abrir nuevos mercados a la exportación. Las pequeñas y medianas empresas del sector no pueden abarcar todos los mercados potenciales y tienen que concentrar sus recursos en algunos mercados específicos. El objeto de este estudio es ayudar a una pequeña empresa de conservas vegetales a establecer las prioridades de introducción de sus productos en países de la unión europea. Se establecen como alternativas, Alemania, Francia e Italia, en el caso de Alemania por su creciente mercado importador, y Francia e Italia, por su gran tradición en el consumo de estos productos. Se trata de un problema de toma de decisiones complejo debido a los criterios que se han de tener en cuenta. Para ello, en este trabajo se propone el uso de diferentes técnicas de toma de decisiones multicriterio (AHP, ANP, PROMETHEE y TOPSIS), y se realiza un análisis comparativo de los resultados obtenidos.Peer reviewe

Testing a Recent DEMATEL-Based Proposal to Simplify the Use of ANP

[EN] The Analytic Network Process (ANP) is a well-known multi-criteria decision method that allows the relationships between its elements to be incorporated into the model. The large number of questions to be answered is one of the main drawbacks of the method, since it is time consuming for decision makers and experts who participate in the decision process. A recent DEMATEL-based ANP proposal can significantly reduce the number and the complexity of questions. This proposal was simply exposed and lacked an experimental test with real cases. The fundamental objective of this work is to answer the question: Does it work? In this work, this new proposal is applied to 45 ANP cases published in the literature. Variants to the verified proposal have also been identified. The results obtained show that the values of the priorities and the ranks obtained with this new proposal are very similar to the results obtained with the ANP, reducing the number of questions required by 42% on average. Additionally, in this work you can find the compilation of the 45 ANP weighted supermatrices to use in your investigations.Schulze-González, E.; Pastor-Ferrando, J.; Aragonés-Beltrán, P. (2021). Testing a Recent DEMATEL-Based Proposal to Simplify the Use of ANP. Mathematics. 9(14):1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9141605S12391

Selection of rail improvement projects using the Analytic Network Process

Trabajo presentado al XI International Symposium on the AHP celebrado en Nápoles (Italia) del 15 al 18 de Junio de 2011.In this artiele the applieation of the Analytie Network Process (ANP) to establish priorities arnong the portfolio of rail infrastructure rnaintenance, rehabilitation and improvernent projects in the area of Valencia (Spain) is presented. The problem is complex because of the large number and variety of projects to be considered and the great number of criteria that must be taken into account in the decision analysis process. The present work is a continuation of a previons research hased on the AHP model. The present study analyzes the different priority values of a particular group of projects obtained in ANP and AHP as well as changes in the weigbts of the criteria and the possibility of eliminating minor criteria from the model for the sake of simplicity.Peer Reviewe

Selection of maintenance, renewal and improvement projects in rail lines using the analytic network process

[EN] This paper addresses one of the most common problems that a railway infrastructure manager has to face: to prioritise a portfolio of maintenance, renewal and improvement (MR&I) projects in a railway network. This decision-making problem is complex due to the large number of MR&I projects in the portfolio and the different criteria to take into consideration, most of which are influenced and interrelated to each other. To address this problem, the use of the analytic network process (ANP) is proposed. The method is applied to a case study in which the Local Manager of the public company, who is responsible for the MR&I of Spanish Rail Lines, has to select the MR&I projects which have to be executed first. Based on the results, it becomes evident that, for this case study, the main factor of preference for a project is the location of application rather than the type of project. The main contributions of this work are: the deep analysis done to identify and weigh the decision criteria, how to assess the alternatives and provide a rigorous and systematic decision-making process, based on an exhaustive revision of the literature and expertiseThe translation of this paper was funded by the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia.Montesinos-Valera, J.; Aragonés-Beltrán, P.; Pastor-Ferrando, J. (2017). Selection of maintenance, renewal and improvement projects in rail lines using the analytic network process. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering. 13(11):1476-1496. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1294189S147614961311Abril, M., Barber, F., Ingolotti, L., Salido, M. A., Tormos, P., & Lova, A. (2008). An assessment of railway capacity. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(5), 774-806. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2007.04.001Ahern, A., & Anandarajah, G. (2007). Railway projects prioritisation for investment: Application of goal programming. Transport Policy, 14(1), 70-80. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2006.10.003Al-Harbi, K. M. A.-S. (2001). Application of the AHP in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 19(1), 19-27. doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(99)00038-1Aragonés-Beltrán, P., Chaparro-González, F., Pastor-Ferrando, J. P., & Rodríguez-Pozo, F. (2010). An ANP-based approach for the selection of photovoltaic solar power plant investment projects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(1), 249-264. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.012Aragonés-Beltrán, P., Chaparro-González, F., Pastor-Ferrando, J.-P., & Pla-Rubio, A. (2014). An AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)/ANP (Analytic Network Process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects. Energy, 66, 222-238. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.016Arif, F., Bayraktar, M. E., & Chowdhury, A. G. (2016). Decision Support Framework for Infrastructure Maintenance Investment Decision Making. Journal of Management in Engineering, 32(1), 04015030. doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000372Arunraj, N. S., & Maiti, J. (2010). Risk-based maintenance policy selection using AHP and goal programming. Safety Science, 48(2), 238-247. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2009.09.005Asensio, J., & Matas, A. (2008). Commuters’ valuation of travel time variability. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(6), 1074-1085. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2007.12.002Bana e Costa, C. A., & Oliveira, R. C. (2002). Assigning priorities for maintenance, repair and refurbishment in managing a municipal housing stock. European Journal of Operational Research, 138(2), 380-391. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00253-3Bana e Costa, C. A., & Vansnick, J.-C. (2008). A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(3), 1422-1428. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.022Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4Bouch, C. J., Roberts, C., & Amoore, J. (2010). Development of a common set of European high-level track maintenance cost categories. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 224(4), 327-335. doi:10.1243/09544097jrrt316Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T., Pirlot, M., Perny, P., Tsoukiàs, A., & Vincke, P. (2000). Evaluation and Decision Models. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1593-7Evaluation and Decision Models with Multiple Criteria. (2006). International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. doi:10.1007/0-387-31099-1Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., & Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The Promethee method. European Journal of Operational Research, 24(2), 228-238. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5Cantarelli, C. C., van Wee, B., Molin, E. J. E., & Flyvbjerg, B. (2012). Different cost performance: different determinants? Transport Policy, 22, 88-95. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.04.002Cheng, C.-H. (1997). Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function. European Journal of Operational Research, 96(2), 343-350. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(96)00026-4Cheng, E. W. L., & Li, H. (2005). Analytic Network Process Applied to Project Selection. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(4), 459-466. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2005)131:4(459)Damart, S., & Roy, B. (2009). The uses of cost–benefit analysis in public transportation decision-making in France. Transport Policy, 16(4), 200-212. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.06.002Durango-Cohen, P. L., & Madanat, S. M. (2008). Optimization of inspection and maintenance decisions for infrastructure facilities under performance model uncertainty: A quasi-Bayes approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(8), 1074-1085. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2008.03.004Durango-Cohen, P. L., & Sarutipand, P. (2009). Maintenance optimization for transportation systems with demand responsiveness. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 17(4), 337-348. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2009.01.001Dyer, J. S. (1990). Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 36(3), 249-258. doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.3.249Famurewa, S. M., Asplund, M., Rantatalo, M., Parida, A., & Kumar, U. (2014). Maintenance analysis for continuous improvement of railway infrastructure performance. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(7), 957-969. doi:10.1080/15732479.2014.921929Famurewa, S. M., Stenström, C., Asplund, M., Galar, D., & Kumar, U. (2014). Composite indicator for railway infrastructure management. Journal of Modern Transportation, 22(4), 214-224. doi:10.1007/s40534-014-0051-1Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrogott, M. (2005). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. doi:10.1007/b100605FitzRoy, F., & Smith, I. (1995). The demand for rail transport in European countries. Transport Policy, 2(3), 153-158. doi:10.1016/0967-070x(95)96745-7Furuya, A., & Madanat, S. (2013). Accounting for Network Effects in Railway Asset Management. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 139(1), 92-100. doi:10.1061/(asce)te.1943-5436.0000477Gao, L., Guo, R., & Zhang, Z. (2013). An augmented Lagrangian decomposition approach for infrastructure maintenance and rehabilitation decisions under budget uncertainty. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9(5), 448-457. doi:10.1080/15732479.2011.557388Gerçek, H., Karpak, B., & Kılınçaslan, T. (2004). A multiple criteria approach for the evaluation of the rail transit networks in Istanbul. Transportation, 31(2), 203-228. doi:10.1023/b:port.0000016572.41816.d2Goverde, R. M. P. (2010). A delay propagation algorithm for large-scale railway traffic networks. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 18(3), 269-287. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2010.01.002Grimes, G. A., & Barkan, C. P. L. (2006). Cost-Effectiveness of Railway Infrastructure Renewal Maintenance. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 132(8), 601-608. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2006)132:8(601)Harker, P. T., & Vargas, L. G. (1990). Reply to «Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process» by J. S. Dyer. Management Science, 36(3), 269-273. doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.3.269Huisman, T., & Boucherie, R. J. (2001). Running times on railway sections with heterogeneous train traffic. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 35(3), 271-292. doi:10.1016/s0191-2615(99)00051-xHwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9Ieda, H., Kanayama, Y., Ota, M., Yamazaki, T., & Okamura, T. (2001). How can the quality of rail services in Tokyo be further improved? Transport Policy, 8(2), 97-106. doi:10.1016/s0967-070x(01)00002-6Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143Ishizaka, A., & Nemery, P. (2013). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. doi:10.1002/9781118644898Ivanović, I., Grujičić, D., Macura, D., Jović, J., & Bojović, N. (2013). One approach for road transport project selection. Transport Policy, 25, 22-29. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.10.001Johansson, P., & Nilsson, J.-E. (2004). An economic analysis of track maintenance costs. Transport Policy, 11(3), 277-286. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.12.002Kabir, G., Sadiq, R., & Tesfamariam, S. (2013). A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10(9), 1176-1210. doi:10.1080/15732479.2013.795978Karanik, M., Wanderer, L., Gomez-Ruiz, J. A., & Pelaez, J. I. (2016). Reconstruction methods for AHP pairwise matrices: How reliable are they? Applied Mathematics and Computation, 279, 103-124. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2016.01.008Karydas, D. M., & Gifun, J. F. (2006). A method for the efficient prioritization of infrastructure renewal projects. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91(1), 84-99. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2004.11.016Kułakowski, K. (2015). Notes on order preservation and consistency in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 245(1), 333-337. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.03.010Kumar, G., & Maiti, J. (2012). Modeling risk based maintenance using fuzzy analytic network process. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(11), 9946-9954. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.004Lee, A. H. I., Chen, H. H., & Kang, H.-Y. (2009). Operations management of new project development: innovation, efficient, effective aspects. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(6), 797-809. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602605LEE, A. H. I., KANG, H.-Y., & CHANG, C.-C. (2011). AN INTEGRATED INTERPRETIVE STRUCTURAL MODELING–FUZZY ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS–BENEFITS, OPPORTUNITIES, COSTS AND RISKS MODEL FOR SELECTING TECHNOLOGIES. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 10(05), 843-871. doi:10.1142/s0219622011004592Liang, C., & Li, Q. (2008). Enterprise information system project selection with regard to BOCR. International Journal of Project Management, 26(8), 810-820. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.11.001Macharis, C., & Bernardini, A. (2015). Reviewing the use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the evaluation of transport projects: Time for a multi-actor approach. Transport Policy, 37, 177-186. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.11.002Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications – Two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(8), 4126-4148. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003Medury, A., & Madanat, S. (2013). Incorporating network considerations into pavement management systems: A case for approximate dynamic programming. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 33, 134-150. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2013.03.003Millet, I., & Saaty, T. L. (2000). On the relativity of relative measures – accommodating both rank preservation and rank reversals in the AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 121(1), 205-212. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00040-5Nyström, B., & Söderholm, P. (2010). Selection of maintenance actions using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP): decision-making in railway infrastructure. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 6(4), 467-479. doi:10.1080/15732470801990209Olsson, N. O. E., Økland, A., & Halvorsen, S. B. (2012). Consequences of differences in cost-benefit methodology in railway infrastructure appraisal—A comparison between selected countries. Transport Policy, 22, 29-35. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.03.005Özgür, Ö. (2011). Performance analysis of rail transit investments in Turkey: İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir and Bursa. Transport Policy, 18(1), 147-155. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.07.004Özkır, V., & Demirel, T. (2012). A fuzzy assessment framework to select among transportation investment projects in Turkey. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 74-80. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.051Pardo-Bosch, F., & Aguado, A. (2014). Investment priorities for the management of hydraulic structures. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(10), 1338-1351. doi:10.1080/15732479.2014.964267Phillips, L. D., & Bana e Costa, C. A. (2007). Transparent prioritisation, budgeting and resource allocation with multi-criteria decision analysis and decision conferencing. Annals of Operations Research, 154(1), 51-68. doi:10.1007/s10479-007-0183-3Roy, B. (1991). The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods. Theory and Decision, 31(1), 49-73. doi:10.1007/bf00134132Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-iSaaty, T. L. (2006). Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(2), 557-570. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.032Saaty, T. L. (2008). Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process. Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales. Serie A. Matematicas, 102(2), 251-318. doi:10.1007/bf03191825SAATY, T. L., & SAGIR, M. (2009). EXTENDING THE MEASUREMENT OF TANGIBLES TO INTANGIBLES. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 08(01), 7-27. doi:10.1142/s0219622009003247Saaty, T. L., & Shih, H.-S. (2009). Structures in decision making: On the subjective geometry of hierarchies and networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 199(3), 867-872. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.064Saaty, T. L., & Tran, L. T. (2007). On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7-8), 962-975. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.022Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (1993). Experiments on rank preservation and reversal in relative measurement. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 17(4-5), 13-18. doi:10.1016/0895-7177(93)90171-tSalem, O. M., Miller, R. A., Deshpande, A. S., & Arurkar, T. P. (2013). Multi-criteria decision-making system for selecting an effective plan for bridge rehabilitation. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 9(8), 806-816. doi:10.1080/15732479.2011.615843Seyedshohadaie, S. R., Damnjanovic, I., & Butenko, S. (2010). Risk-based maintenance and rehabilitation decisions for transportation infrastructure networks. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 44(4), 236-248. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2010.01.005Shattuck, M., & Wagner, C. (2016). Peter Fishburn’s analysis of ambiguity. Theory and Decision, 81(2), 153-165. doi:10.1007/s11238-016-9534-3Sohn, K. (2008). A systematic decision criterion for the elimination of useless overpasses. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(8), 1043-1055. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2008.03.003Thomas, L. J., Rhind, D. J. A., & Robinson, K. J. (2005). Rail passenger perceptions of risk and safety and priorities for improvement. Cognition, Technology & Work, 8(1), 67-75. doi:10.1007/s10111-005-0021-9Tsamboulas, D. A. (2007). A tool for prioritizing multinational transport infrastructure investments. Transport Policy, 14(1), 11-26. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2006.06.001Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1-29. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028Wallenius, J., Dyer, J. S., Fishburn, P. C., Steuer, R. E., Zionts, S., & Deb, K. (2008). Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead. Management Science, 54(7), 1336-1349. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1070.083

Citizenship Tests in Five Countries – An Expression of Political Liberalism?

Engaging discussions on civic integration for immigrants, this comparison systematically analysis citizenship tests in the US, Austria, the UK, Germany, and the Netherlands. A central question discussed is whether these tests can be interpreted as assimilation, repressive liberalism or as a neutral instrument that changes its function according to the surrounding citizenship regime as some authors argue. The analysis has the surprising result that none of the hypotheses from the existing literature on civic integration can explain the content of all five citizenship tests. In particular I find that the characteristics of the surrounding citizenship regime are not a good predictor for the content of the respective citizenship tests: countries with rather restrictive citizenship regimes such as Austria or Germany have opted for a citizenship test with a liberal content that is comparable not only to the British but also to the US-American test. On the other hand the content of the Dutch citizenship test does not fully correspond to a Rawlsian definition of political liberalism although the Dutch citizenship regime is relatively open. Therefore I conclude that the formal character of a citizenship regime is only loosely connected with the national definition of citizenship as it is conveyed by the content of citizenship tests. It is not because civic integration requirements are obligatory and restrict the free will of future citizens that citizenship itself is defined in illiberal terms.Als Beitrag zu der Debatte über Integrationsanforderungen für Zuwanderer vergleicht diese Studie systematisch den Inhalt von Einbürgerungstests der USA, Österreichs, des Vereinigten Königreichs, Deutschlands und der Niederlande. Eine zentrale Frage ist, ob die Tests als Assimilation, repressiver Liberalismus oder neutrales Instrument, dessen Funktion erst durch den Charakter des jeweiligen Staatsangehörigkeitsregimes bestimmt wird, verstanden werden können. Überraschenderweise zeigt die Studie, dass keine der in der Literatur vertretenen Hypothesen den Inhalt aller fünf Einbürgerungstests erklären kann. Insbesondere wird deutlich, dass Länder mit einem eher restriktiven Staatsangehörigkeitsrecht wie Österreich und Deutschland Einbürgerungstests mit einem liberalen Inhalt eingeführt haben, der nicht nur dem britischen, sondern auch dem amerikanischen Test ähnelt. Andererseits entspricht der Inhalt des niederländischen Tests nicht vollständig einer Rawlsischen Definition des politischen Liberalismus, obwohl das niederländische Staatsangehörigkeitsrecht relativ offen ist. Deshalb komme ich zu der Schlussfolgerung, dass der formale Charakter eines Staatsangehörigkeitsregimes nur lose mit dem jeweiligen nationalen Verständnis von Bürgerschaft verbunden ist, wie es durch den Inhalt der Einbürgerungstests zum Ausdruck gebracht wird. Der obligatorische Charakter von Integrationsanforderungen, der den freien Willen zukünftiger Bürger einschränkt, besagt nicht, dass Bürgerschaft in illiberalen Termini definiert wird

Selección de una máquina termoformadora mediante la aplicación de técnicas de decisión multicriterio. Análisis comparativo

Trabajo presentado al XVI Congreso Internacional de Ingeniería de Proyectos (AEIPRO), celebrado en Valencia (España) del 11 al 13 de julio de 2012.[EN]: In the present work a comparative study between different techniques of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (AHP / ANP TOPSIS and PROMETHEE) applied to the problem of selection of industrial machinery have been done. This is a complex decision-making problem because different economic and technical criteria have to be considered. The whole decision making process and to what extent the results obtained depend on the technique is analyzed. The work has focused on the case of selecting a thermoforming machine whose investment volume is approximately € 190,000.[ES]: En el presente trabajo se realiza un estudio comparativo entre diferentes técnicas de Análisis Multicriterio de Decisiones (AHP/ANP, PROMETHEE y TOPSIS) aplicadas al problema de selección de maquinaria industrial. Se trata de un problema de toma de decisiones complejo debido a que hay que tener en cuenta diferentes criterios de tipo económico y técnico. Se analiza todo el proceso de toma de decisiones y hasta qué punto los resultados obtenidos dependen de la técnica utilizada.Peer reviewe

Assessment of regional development needs according to criteria based on the Sustainable Development Goals in the Meta Region (Colombia)

[EN] When a regional government considers investing funds for the sustainable development of its region, it must consider the real needs of the population and the fulfillment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The identification of needs should be carried out with the support of local stakeholders representing various social groups. This paper seeks to answer the question of how to guide public investment policies at the local level, such as improving education, health, transportation and others, to better meet the SDGs. To answer this question, a multi-criteria decision-making process is followed, whereby, once the needs are classified by investment areas, they are prioritized based on criteria derived from the SDGs. The problem is complex because of the difficulty of the local stakeholder engagement process and also because of the interrelationships and influences that arise between all the elements of the decision problem: criteria and alternatives. To address this complexity, the Analytical Network Process method combined with DEMATEL will be followed. This process is applied to the case study of the distribution of funds allocated by the Government of Colombia to the Meta Region (Colombia) with the participation of 48 stakeholders to identify needs and the support of six experts in sustainability and project management for their prioritization.Aragonés-Beltrán, P.; González-Cruz, M.; León-Camargo, A.; Viñoles-Cebolla, R. (2023). Assessment of regional development needs according to criteria based on the Sustainable Development Goals in the Meta Region (Colombia). Sustainable Development. 31(2):1101-1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.24431101112131