Organization of a U.S. County System for Comprehensive Acute Stroke Care

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Organized systems of care have the potential to improve acute stroke care delivery. The current report describes the experience of implementing a countywide system of spoke-and-hub Stroke Neurology Receiving Centers (SNRC) that incorporated several comprehensive stroke center recommendations. METHODS Observational study of patients with suspected stroke <5 hours duration transported by Emergency Medical System personnel to an SNRC during the first year of this system. RESULTS A total of 1,360 patients with suspected stroke were evaluated at 9 hub SNRCs, of which 553 (40.7%) had a discharge diagnosis of ischemic stroke. Of these 553, intravenous (IV) tPA was given to 110 patients (19.9% of ischemic strokes). Care at the 6 neurointerventional-ready SNRC was a major focus, where 25.1% (99/395) of the patients with ischemic stroke received acute IV or intraarterial reperfusion therapy, and where provision of such therapies was less common with milder stroke, higher age, and Hispanic origin. The door-to-needle time for IV tPA met the <60 minute target in only 25% of patients and was 37% longer (p=0.0001) when SNRCs were neurointerventional-ready. CONCLUSIONS A stroke system that incorporates features of comprehensive stroke centers can be effectively implemented, and with substantial rates of acute reperfusion therapy administration. Experiences potentially useful to broader implementation of comprehensive stroke centers are considered

Organization of a U.S. County System for Comprehensive Acute Stroke Care

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Organized systems of care have the potential to improve acute stroke care delivery. The current report describes the experience of implementing a countywide system of spoke-and-hub Stroke Neurology Receiving Centers (SNRC) that incorporated several comprehensive stroke center recommendations. METHODS Observational study of patients with suspected stroke <5 hours duration transported by Emergency Medical System personnel to an SNRC during the first year of this system. RESULTS A total of 1,360 patients with suspected stroke were evaluated at 9 hub SNRCs, of which 553 (40.7%) had a discharge diagnosis of ischemic stroke. Of these 553, intravenous (IV) tPA was given to 110 patients (19.9% of ischemic strokes). Care at the 6 neurointerventional-ready SNRC was a major focus, where 25.1% (99/395) of the patients with ischemic stroke received acute IV or intraarterial reperfusion therapy, and where provision of such therapies was less common with milder stroke, higher age, and Hispanic origin. The door-to-needle time for IV tPA met the <60 minute target in only 25% of patients and was 37% longer (p=0.0001) when SNRCs were neurointerventional-ready. CONCLUSIONS A stroke system that incorporates features of comprehensive stroke centers can be effectively implemented, and with substantial rates of acute reperfusion therapy administration. Experiences potentially useful to broader implementation of comprehensive stroke centers are considered

A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Prasinezumab in Early Parkinson's Disease (PASADENA) : Rationale, Design, and Baseline Data

Altres ajuts: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.Background: Currently available treatments for Parkinson's disease (PD) do not slow clinical progression nor target alpha-synuclein, a key protein associated with the disease. Objective: The study objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prasinezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds aggregated alpha-synuclein, in individuals with early PD. Methods: The PASADENA study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment study. Individuals with early PD, recruited across the US and Europe, received monthly intravenous doses of prasinezumab (1,500 or 4,500 mg) or placebo for a 52-week period (Part 1), followed by a 52-week extension (Part 2) in which all participants received active treatment. Key inclusion criteria were: aged 40-80 years; Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) Stage I or II; time from diagnosis ≤2 years; having bradykinesia plus one other cardinal sign of PD (e.g., resting tremor, rigidity); DAT-SPECT imaging consistent with PD; and either treatment naïve or on a stable monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitor dose. Study design assumptions for sample size and study duration were built using a patient cohort from the Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI). In this report, baseline characteristics are compared between the treatment-naïve and MAO-B inhibitor-treated PASADENA cohorts and between the PASADENA and PPMI populations. Results: Of the 443 patients screened, 316 were enrolled into the PASADENA study between June 2017 and November 2018, with an average age of 59.9 years and 67.4% being male. Mean time from diagnosis at baseline was 10.11 months, with 75.3% in H&Y Stage II. Baseline motor and non-motor symptoms (assessed using Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [MDS-UPDRS]) were similar in severity between the MAO-B inhibitor-treated and treatment-naïve PASADENA cohorts (MDS-UPDRS sum of Parts I + II + III [standard deviation (SD)]; 30.21 [11.96], 32.10 [13.20], respectively). The overall PASADENA population (63.6% treatment naïve and 36.4% on MAO-B inhibitor) showed a similar severity in MDS-UPDRS scores (e.g., MDS-UPDRS sum of Parts I + II + III [SD]; 31.41 [12.78], 32.63 [13.04], respectively) to the PPMI cohort (all treatment naïve). Conclusions: The PASADENA study population is suitable to investigate the potential of prasinezumab to slow disease progression in individuals with early PD. Trial Registration: NCT03100149