Anartia model spectra graph

Here are the average reflectance spectra for the color patches of the models. Each average was from several models and natural butterflies

The Butterflies of Barro Colorado Island, Panama: Local Extinction since the 1930s

<div><p>Few data are available about the regional or local extinction of tropical butterfly species. When confirmed, local extinction was often due to the loss of host-plant species. We used published lists and recent monitoring programs to evaluate changes in butterfly composition on Barro Colorado Island (BCI, Panama) between an old (1923–1943) and a recent (1993–2013) period. Although 601 butterfly species have been recorded from BCI during the 1923–2013 period, we estimate that 390 species are currently breeding on the island, including 34 cryptic species, currently only known by their DNA Barcode Index Number. Twenty-three butterfly species that were considered abundant during the old period could not be collected during the recent period, despite a much higher sampling effort in recent times. We consider these species locally extinct from BCI and they conservatively represent 6% of the estimated local pool of resident species. Extinct species represent distant phylogenetic branches and several families. The butterfly traits most likely to influence the probability of extinction were host growth form, wing size and host specificity, independently of the phylogenetic relationships among butterfly species. On BCI, most likely candidates for extinction were small hesperiids feeding on herbs (35% of extinct species). However, contrary to our working hypothesis, extinction of these species on BCI cannot be attributed to loss of host plants. In most cases these host plants remain extant, but they probably subsist at lower or more fragmented densities. Coupled with low dispersal power, this reduced availability of host plants has probably caused the local extinction of some butterfly species. Many more bird than butterfly species have been lost from BCI recently, confirming that small preserves may be far more effective at conserving invertebrates than vertebrates and, therefore, should not necessarily be neglected from a conservation viewpoint.</p></div

Datasets used to compile a list of butterfly species collected or observed on BCI, 1923–2013.

<p>(*) Lycaenidae only. All records coded with year 1974, being the mid-point of 1962–1986, this period corresponding to the stay of G. Small in Panama.</p><p>(**) All records coded with year 2000, being the “mid-point” of 1996–2005.</p><p>The number of records (individuals) are indicated for the old and recent periods, as well as for the entire period of study.</p

The Butterflies of Barro Colorado Island, Panama: Local Extinction since the 1930s - Fig 1

<p>(a) Cumulative the number of individuals collected/observed plotted against the mean cumulative number of species collected/observed, for the recent period (1993–2013). Inset: cumulative no. of CTFS transects performed in the shady understory of BCI (2008–2013) plotted against the mean cumulative number of species collected/observed. Broken lines are 95% C.L. (b) Cumulative no. of individuals sequenced plotted against the cumulative no. of cryptic species discovered, for years 2008–2012. The grey line represents the best fit model, with its equation in inset.</p

Details of the % distribution of species richness within the 9 categories of abundance status

<p>(<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0136623#pone.0136623.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>) ordered by (a) faunal composition by families; (b) indices of host specificity; (c) host growth form; (d) indices of geographic distribution; (e) wing color pattern; and (f) wing size. For definition of (b), (d) and (e) indices, see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0136623#pone.0136623.s011" target="_blank">S1 Text</a>.</p

Plot of the scores of sampling years in axes 1 and 2 of the NMDS.

<p>Years are linked chronologically by a solid line. Pie charts indicate for each year the proportion of abundance accounted by (in clockwise order) Hesperiidae (black), Lycaenidae (white), Nymphalidae (grey), Papilionidae (black stippled), Pieridae (white stippled) and Riodinidae (grey squared).</p

A maximum clade credibility consensus tree depicting the phylogenetic relationships between 451 butterfly taxa from six families (see text for details).

<p>Taxa marked in red (actual BIN used) or orange (replacement congeneric BIN used) represent taxa that were abundant in the 1923–1943 surveys but that were not found in the 1993–2013 surveys. Scale bar in millions of years.</p