Toward Defining the Threshold Between Low and High Glucose Variability in Diabetes

International audienceOBJECTIVE:To define the threshold for excess glucose variability (GV), one of the main features of dysglycemia in diabetes.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS:A total of 376 persons with diabetes investigated at the University Hospital of Montpellier (Montpellier, France) underwent continuous glucose monitoring. Participants with type 2 diabetes were divided into several groups-groups 1, 2a, 2b, and 3 (n = 82, 28, 65, and 79, respectively)-according to treatment: 1) diet and/or insulin sensitizers alone; 2) oral therapy including an insulinotropic agent, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (group 2a) or sulfonylureas (group 2b); or 3) insulin. Group 4 included 122 persons with type 1 diabetes. Percentage coefficient of variation for glucose (%CV = [(SD of glucose)/(mean glucose)] × 100) and frequencies of hypoglycemia (interstitial glucose 36% were compared with those with %CV ≤36%.CONCLUSIONS:A %CV of 36% appears to be a suitable threshold to distinguish between stable and unstable glycemia in diabetes because beyond this limit, the frequency of hypoglycemia is significantly increased, especially in insulin-treated subjects

The diabetes-linked transcription factor Pax4 is expressed in human pancreatic islets and is activated by mitogens and GLP-1

We previously demonstrated that the transcription factor Pax4 is important for β-cell replication and survival in rat islets. Herein, we investigate Pax4 expression in islets of non-diabetic and diabetic donors, its regulation by mitogens, glucose and the incretin GLP-1 and evaluate its effect on human islet proliferation. Pax4 expression was increased in islets derived from Type 2 diabetic donors correlating with hyperglycaemia. In vitro studies on non diabetic islets demonstrated that glucose, betacellulin, activin A, GLP-1 and insulin increased Pax4 mRNA levels. Glucose-induced Pax4 expression was abolished by the inhibitors LY294002, PD98050 or H89. Surprisingly, increases in Pax4 expression did not prompt a surge in human islet cell replication. Furthermore, expression of the proliferation marker gene Id2 remained unaltered. Adenoviral-mediated expression of human Pax4 resulted in a small increase in Bcl-xL expression while Id2 transcript levels and cell replication were unchanged in human islets. In contrast, overexpression of mouse Pax4 induced human islet cell proliferation. Treatment of islets with 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine induced Pax4 without stimulating Bcl-xL and Id2 expression. Human Pax4 DNA binding activity was found to be lower than that of the mouse homologue. Thus, human pax4 gene expression is epigenetically regulated and induced by physiological stimuli through the concerted action of multiple signalling pathways. However, it is unable to initiate the transcriptional replication program likely due to post-translational modifications of the protein. The latter highlights fundamental differences between human and rodent islet physiology and emphasizes the importance of validating results obtained with animal models in human tissue

LDHA is enriched in human islet alpha cells and upregulated in type 2 diabetes

The lactate dehydrogenase isoform A (LDHA) is a key metabolic enzyme that preferentially catalyzes the conversion of pyruvate to lactate. Whereas LDHA is highly expressed in many tissues, its expression is turned off in the differentiated adult β-cell within the pancreatic islets. The repression of LDHA under normal physiological condition and its inappropriate upregulation under a diabetogenic environment is well-documented in rodent islets/β-cells but little is known about LDHA expression in human islet cells and whether its abundance is altered under diabetic conditions. Analysis of public single-cell RNA-seq (sc-RNA seq) data as well as cell type-specific immunolabeling of human pancreatic islets showed that LDHA was mainly localized in human α-cells while it is expressed at a very low level in β-cells. Furthermore, LDHA, both at mRNA and protein, as well as lactate production is upregulated in human pancreatic islets exposed to chronic high glucose treatment. Microscopic analysis of stressed human islets and autopsy pancreases from individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) showed LDHA upregulation mainly in human α-cells. Pharmacological inhibition of LDHA in isolated human islets enhanced insulin secretion under physiological conditions but did not significantly correct the deregulated secretion of insulin or glucagon under diabetic conditions

SGLT2 is not expressed in pancreatic α- and β-cells, and its inhibition does not directly affect glucagon and insulin secretion in rodents and humans.

OBJECTIVE: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (SGLT2i), or gliflozins, are anti-diabetic drugs that lower glycemia by promoting glucosuria, but they also stimulate endogenous glucose and ketone body production. The likely causes of these metabolic responses are increased blood glucagon levels, and decreased blood insulin levels, but the mechanisms involved are hotly debated. This study verified whether or not SGLT2i affect glucagon and insulin secretion by a direct action on islet cells in three species, using multiple approaches. METHODS: We tested the in vivo effects of two selective SGLT2i (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin) and a SGLT1/2i (sotagliflozin) on various biological parameters (glucosuria, glycemia, glucagonemia, insulinemia) in mice. mRNA expression of SGLT2 and other glucose transporters was assessed in rat, mouse, and human FACS-purified α- and β-cells, and by analysis of two human islet cell transcriptomic datasets. Immunodetection of SGLT2 in pancreatic tissues was performed with a validated antibody. The effects of dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and sotagliflozin on glucagon and insulin secretion were assessed using isolated rat, mouse and human islets and the in situ perfused mouse pancreas. Finally, we tested the long-term effect of SGLT2i on glucagon gene expression. RESULTS: SGLT2 inhibition in mice increased the plasma glucagon/insulin ratio in the fasted state, an effect correlated with a decline in glycemia. Gene expression analyses and immunodetections showed no SGLT2 mRNA or protein expression in rodent and human islet cells, but moderate SGLT1 mRNA expression in human α-cells. However, functional experiments on rat, mouse, and human (29 donors) islets and the in situ perfused mouse pancreas did not identify any direct effect of dapagliflozin, empagliflozin or sotagliflozin on glucagon and insulin secretion. SGLT2i did not affect glucagon gene expression in rat and human islets. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that the SGLT2i-induced increase of the plasma glucagon/insulin ratio in vivo does not result from a direct action of the gliflozins on islet cells

Canakinumab in patients with COVID-19 and type 2 diabetes - A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity have chronic activation of the innate immune system possibly contributing to the higher risk of hyperinflammatory response to SARS-CoV2 and severe COVID-19 observed in this population. We tested whether interleukin-1β (IL-1β) blockade using canakinumab improves clinical outcome. METHODS: CanCovDia was a multicenter, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy of canakinumab plus standard-of-care compared with placebo plus standard-of-care in patients with type 2 diabetes and a BMI > 25 kg/m$^{2}$ hospitalised with SARS-CoV2 infection in seven tertiary-hospitals in Switzerland. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to a single intravenous dose of canakinumab (body weight adapted dose of 450-750 mg) or placebo. Canakinumab and placebo were compared based on an unmatched win-ratio approach based on length of survival, ventilation, ICU stay and hospitalization at day 29. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04510493. FINDINGS: Between October 17, 2020, and May 12, 2021, 116 patients were randomly assigned with 58 in each group. One participant dropped out in each group for the primary analysis. At the time of randomization, 85 patients (74·6 %) were treated with dexamethasone. The win-ratio of canakinumab vs placebo was 1·08 (95 % CI 0·69-1·69; p = 0·72). During four weeks, in the canakinumab vs placebo group 4 (7·0%) vs 7 (12·3%) participants died, 11 (20·0 %) vs 16 (28·1%) patients were on ICU, 12 (23·5 %) vs 11 (21·6%) were hospitalised for more than 3 weeks, respectively. Median ventilation time at four weeks in the canakinumab vs placebo group was 10 [IQR 6.0, 16.5] and 16 days [IQR 14.0, 23.0], respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in HbA1c after four weeks despite a lower number of anti-diabetes drug administered in patients treated with canakinumab. Finally, high-sensitive CRP and IL-6 was lowered by canakinumab. Serious adverse events were reported in 13 patients (11·4%) in each group. INTERPRETATION: In patients with type 2 diabetes who were hospitalised with COVID-19, treatment with canakinumab in addition to standard-of-care did not result in a statistically significant improvement of the primary composite outcome. Patients treated with canakinumab required significantly less anti-diabetes drugs to achieve similar glycaemic control. Canakinumab was associated with a prolonged reduction of systemic inflammation. FUNDING: Swiss National Science Foundation grant #198415 and University of Basel. Novartis supplied study medication

Evaluation de la variabilité glycémique dans le diabète de Type 1 traité par pompe à insuline bien contrôlé d'après l'hémoglobine glyquée

Pré-requis: Le niveau d'HbA1c est classiquement utilisé pour déterminer l'équilibre glycémique des patients diabétiques sans prendre en compte le niveau de variabilité glycémique réel. Le but de cette étude était de préciser la variabilité glycémique de patients diabétiques de type 1 considérés comme bien équilibrés sur le niveau d'HbAlc. Patients et Méthodes: Un enregistrement continu du glucose par CGMS® a été réalisé chez trente sujets traités par perfusion insulinique continue par pompe sous-cutanée (PSC) (n= 16) ou par pompe intra-péritonéale (PIP) (n= 14) dont l'HbAlc était inférieure à 8%. Résultats: Les patients étaient âgés de 54+- 1 ans, diabétiques depuis 29+- 15 ans, traités par pompe depuis 11+-8 ans. L'HbAlc (%) était de 7,O+-O,5, plus basse sous PIP 6,7+-O,6 que sous PSC 7,2+-O,4 (p=O,02). Sur le relevé de l'autosurveillance glycémique du mois précédent les patients présentaient 24+-14 hypoglycémies (inférieures à 70mg/dl) par mois dont 6+-8 inférieures à 50mg/dl et sur l'enregistrement CGMS® ils passaient 9,2+-7,3% du temps en hypoglycémie sans différence selon la voie de perfusion. La variabilité glycémique restait élevée, significativement plus basse sous PIP que sous PSC quefque soit l'indicateur retenu (mg/dl): SD (5o+-9 sous PIP vs 60+-12 sous PSC (p=O,Ol)), MAGE (132+-22 sous PIP vs 163+-46 'sous PSC (p=O,03)) ou MODD (5o+-14 sous PIP vs 67+-17 sous PSC (p=O,Ol)). Le temps passé en dysglycémie, la glycémie moyenne et les indices de la variabilité glycémique étaient similaires selon le niveau d'HbAlc<7% ou d'HbAlc2':7%. Conclusion: Notre étude a montré qu'en dépit d'une HbAlc bien contrôlée, les patients gardent une variabilité glycémique importante, et qu'en comparaison avec la voie sous-cutanée, le traitement par voie intra-péritonéale permet d'obtenir une variabilité moindre et une HbAlc mieux contrôlée sans augmenter la fréquence deshypoglycémies.MONTPELLIER-BU Médecine UPM (341722108) / SudocSudocFranceF