The role of influenza viruses in the development of severe acute respiratory infection in patients admitted to Yekaterinburg hospitals during 2017–2018 epidemic season

Objective. To study the role of influenza viruses in the development of severe acute respiratory infections (SARI) in patients admitted to Yekaterinburg hospitals during 2017-2018 epidemic season.Materials and Methods. A retrospective epidemiological analysis of influenza incidence in Yekaterinburg was conducted, 403 influenza and acute respiratory viral infections case sheets were studied, and PCR analysis of clinical samples from the patients for respiratory viral infections was performed.Results. During the epidemic period a total 27.0% of the Yekaterinburg population were reported with influenza and other SARI, with 1.8% patients hospitalized. 5.6% of the total number of patients admitted with influenza and SARI in Yekaterinburg hospitals were included in the study. The rate of the detection of influenza A and B viruses RNA in the clinical samples from the patients with SARI was 28.3%. The rates of the detection in PCR of influenza B/Yamagata, A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) were 46.5, 20.2 and 10.5%, respectively.Conclusion. The study results indicated that influenza viruses remain significant pathogens of respiratory infections that required hospitalization. Among patients with SARI the highest incidence was observed in children of a younger age group and was mainly associated with influenza B virus of Yamagata lineage and influenza A virus (H1N1)pdm09. According to the results of a molecular genetic study, influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 viruses belonged to clade 6B.1, carried characteristic amino acid substitutions in hemagglutinin S84N, S162N (with the acquisition of a potential glycosylation site) and I216T and were similar to the A/Michigan/45/2015 vaccine strain. The influenza B viruses studied belonged to the Yamagata lineage, clade 3. The influenza B/Ekaterinburg /RII-4723S/2018 virus differed from the reference strain B/Phuket/3073/2013 by two amino acid substitutions in the hemagglutinin gene M251V and L172Q

First-year results of the Global Influenza Hospital Surveillance Network: 2012-2013 Northern hemisphere influenza season

Background: The Global Influenza Hospital Surveillance Network (GIHSN) was developed to improve understanding of severe influenza infection, as represented by hospitalized cases. The GIHSN is composed of coordinating sites, mainly affiliated with health authorities, each of which supervises and compiles data from one to seven hospitals. This report describes the distribution of influenza viruses A(H1N1), A(H3N2), B/Victoria, and B/Yamagata resulting in hospitalization during 2012-2013, the network's first year

2012-2013 Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness against Influenza Hospitalizations: Results from the Global Influenza Hospital Surveillance Network

<div><p>Background</p><p>The effectiveness of currently licensed vaccines against influenza has not been clearly established, especially among individuals at increased risk for complications from influenza. We used a test-negative approach to estimate influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) against hospitalization with laboratory-confirmed influenza based on data collected from the Global Influenza Hospital Surveillance Network (GIHSN).</p><p>Methods and Findings</p><p>This was a multi-center, prospective, active surveillance, hospital-based epidemiological study during the 2012–2013 influenza season. Data were collected from hospitals participating in the GIHSN, including five in Spain, five in France, and four in the Russian Federation. Influenza was confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. IVE against hospitalization for laboratory-confirmed influenza was estimated for adult patients targeted for vaccination and who were swabbed within 7 days of symptom onset. The overall adjusted IVE was 33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11% to 49%). Point estimates of IVE were 23% (95% CI, −26% to 53%) for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, 30% (95% CI, −37% to 64%) for influenza A(H3N2), and 43% (95% CI, 17% to 60%) for influenza B/Yamagata. IVE estimates were similar in subjects <65 and ≥65 years of age (35% [95% CI, −15% to 63%] vs.31% [95% CI, 4% to 51%]). Heterogeneity in site-specific IVE estimates was high (I² = 63.4%) for A(H1N1)pdm09 in patients ≥65 years of age. IVE estimates for influenza B/Yamagata were homogenous (I² = 0.0%).</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>These results, which were based on data collected from the GIHSN during the 2012–2013 influenza season, showed that influenza vaccines provided low to moderate protection against hospital admission with laboratory-confirmed influenza in adults targeted for influenza vaccination. In this population, IVE estimates against A(H1N1)pdm09 were sensitive to age group and study site. Influenza vaccination was moderately effective in preventing admissions with influenza B/Yamagata for all sites and age groups.</p></div

Heterogeneity of IVE estimates at each site overall.

<p>Heterogeneity of IVE estimates at each site overall.</p

Pooled IVE in hospitalized patients swabbed within 7 days of symptom onset.

<p>CI, confidence interval; IVE, influenza vaccine effectiveness.</p>a<p>Site as a random effect.</p>b<p>Adjusted by week of symptom onset, age group, sex, hospitalization in the previous 12 months, presence of chronic conditions, and smoking habits.</p

Characteristics of patients included in the IVE analysis at each site.

a<p>Missing: St. Petersburg, n = 12; France, n = 1.</p>b<p>Missing: St. Petersburg, n = 11; France, n = 65.</p>c<p>Presented only for patients ≥65 years of age. No impairment defined as a Barthel score >60. Data missing: St. Petersburg, n = 13; Moscow, n = 37.</p

Number of admissions by epidemiological week at each site.

<p>The number of patients enrolled and included in the IVE analysis is shown by epidemiological week at each site for each influenza strain.</p

RT-PCR results at each site overall and in patients 18–64 and ≥65 years of age.

a<p>Percentages are compared to the total of all patients in the category.</p>b<p>Percentages are compared to influenza-positive patients.</p

Subjects included and excluded by coordinating site.

<p>Subjects included and excluded by coordinating site.</p

Characteristics of patients included in the IVE analysis by RT-PCR result.

<p><i>P</i>-values were determined by Pearson’s chi-square test. NC, not calculated.</p>a<p>N = 2158.</p>b<p>N = 2032.</p>c<p>N = 1069.</p>d<p>No impairment defined as a Barthel score >60.</p>e<p>Data on vaccination were exclusively from self-reporting for only 5.2% of all vaccinated patients. None of the patients with clinical records of vaccination self-reported not having been vaccinated.</p>f<p>N = 2168.</p