Effects of dietary nitrate supplementation on microvascular physiology at 4559 m altitude – a randomised controlled trial (Xtreme Alps)

Native highlanders (e.g. Sherpa) demonstrate remarkable hypoxic tolerance, possibly secondary to higher levels of circulating nitric oxide (NO) and increased microcirculatory blood flow. As part of the Xtreme Alps study (a randomised placebo-controlled trial of dietary nitrate supplementation under field conditions of hypobaric hypoxia), we investigated whether dietary supplementation with nitrate could improve NO availability and microvascular blood flow in lowlanders. Plasma measurements of nitrate, nitrite and nitroso species were performed together with measurements of sublingual (sidestream dark-field camera) and forearm blood flow (venous occlusion plethysmography) in 28 healthy adult volunteers resident at 4559 m for 1 week; half receiving a beetroot-based high-nitrate supplement and half receiving an identically-tasting low nitrate 'placebo'. Dietary supplementation increased plasma nitrate concentrations 4-fold compared to the placebo group, both at sea level (SL; 19.2 vs 76.9 μM) and at day 5 (D5) of high altitude (22.9 vs 84.3 μM,

Clinical care in extreme environments: Physiology at high altitude and in space

□ High altitude or space environments present a number of extreme physiologic challenges that must be overcome in order to survive. □ Given sufficient time, humans can adapt to both hypobaric hypoxia and microgravity. □ Lack of adaptation can lead to environment-specific illnesses, such as acute mountain sickness,high-altitude pulmonary edema, decompression illness, or the acute worsening of comorbid conditions. □ These conditions can rapidly become fatal if not treated appropriately (e.g., with either descent to lower altitudes or returning to the Earth’s surface). □ Providing critical care or anesthesia in such environments is further complicated by their ex- treme levels of remoteness. □ Exploratory missions to such environments depend on the development and vetting of robust and simple health care protocols

Acute high-altitude pathologies and their treatment

Ascent to high altitude triggers a wide range of physiological changes. However, ascent is also associated with three acute pathologies: acute mountain sickness, high-altitude cerebral oedema (HACE) and high-altitude pulmonary oedema (HAPE). Awareness and understanding of these conditions allows measures to be taken to reduce the risk of them developing through careful planning and, where appropriate, pharmacological prophylaxis. Both HACE and HAPE are life threatening, necessitating prompt diagnosis and management. Acute mountain sickness, although usually benign, may progress, to HACE or HAPE, if not managed appropriately. This review examines each pathology providing options for risk reduction, diagnosis and management, as well as considering comorbidity at altitude, drawing upon recent advances and consensus guidelines in the field.</p

Oxygen targets during mechanical ventilation in the ICU: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: patients admitted to intensive care often require treatment with invasive mechanical ventilation and high concentrations of oxygen. Mechanical ventilation can cause acute lung injury that may be exacerbated by oxygen therapy. Uncertainty remains about which oxygen therapy targets result in the best clinical outcomes for these patients. This review aims to determine whether higher or lower oxygenation targets are beneficial for mechanically ventilated adult patients.Data sources: Excerpta Medica dataBASE, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, and Cochrane medical databases were searched from inception through to February 28, 2021.Study selection: randomized controlled trials comparing higher and lower oxygen targets in adult patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy in an intensive care setting.Data extraction: study setting, participant type, participant numbers, and intervention targets were captured. Outcome measures included "mortality at longest follow-up" (primary), mechanical ventilator duration and free days, vasopressor-free days, patients on renal replacement therapy, renal replacement free days, cost benefit, and quality of life scores. Evidence certainty and risk of bias were evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A random-effects models was used. Post hoc subgroup analysis looked separately at studies comparing hypoxemia versus normoxemia and normoxemia versus hyperoxemia.Data synthesis: data from eight trials (4,415 participants) were analyzed. Comparing higher and lower oxygen targets, there was no difference in mortality (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.74-1.22), but heterogeneous and overlapping target ranges limit the validity and clinical relevance of this finding. Data from seven studies (n = 4,245) demonstrated targeting normoxemia compared with hyperoxemia may reduce mortality at longest follow-up (0.73 [0.57-0.95]) but this estimate had very low certainty. There was no difference in mortality between targeting relative hypoxemia or normoxemia (1.20 [0.83-1.73]).Conclusions: this systematic review and meta-analysis identified possible increased mortality with liberal oxygen targeting strategies and no difference in morbidity between high or low oxygen targets in mechanically ventilated adults. Findings were limited by substantial heterogeneity in study methodology and further research is urgently required to define optimal oxygen therapy targets.</p

Response to Verd and Verd Re: "COVID-19: A Redox Disease-What a Stress Pandemic Can Teach Us About Resilience and What We May Learn from the Reactive Species Interactome About Its Treatment"

Significance: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), affects every aspect of human life by challenging bodily, socioeconomic, and political systems at unprecedented levels. As vaccines become available, their distribution, safety, and efficacy against emerging variants remain uncertain, and specific treatments are lacking. Recent Advances: Initially affecting the lungs, COVID-19 is a complex multisystems disease that disturbs the whole-body redox balance and can be long-lasting (Long-COVID). Numerous risk factors have been identified, but the reasons for variations in susceptibility to infection, disease severity, and outcome are poorly understood. The reactive species interactome (RSI) was recently introduced as a framework to conceptualize how cells and whole organisms sense, integrate, and accommodate stress. Critical Issues: We here consider COVID-19 as a redox disease, offering a holistic perspective of its effects on the human body, considering the vulnerability of complex interconnected systems with multiorgan/multilevel interdependencies. Host/viral glycan interactions underpin SARS-CoV-2's extraordinary efficiency in gaining cellular access, crossing the epithelial/endothelial barrier to spread along the vascular/lymphatic endothelium, and evading antiviral/antioxidant defences. An inflammation-driven "oxidative storm" alters the redox landscape, eliciting epithelial, endothelial, mitochondrial, metabolic, and immune dysfunction, and coagulopathy. Concomitantly reduced nitric oxide availability renders the sulfur-based redox circuitry vulnerable to oxidation, with eventual catastrophic failure in redox communication/regulation. Host nutrient limitations are crucial determinants of resilience at the individual and population level. Future Directions: While inflicting considerable damage to health and well-being, COVID-19 may provide the ultimate testing ground to improve the diagnosis and treatment of redox-related stress diseases. "Redox phenotyping" of patients to characterize whole-body RSI status as the disease progresses may inform new therapeutic approaches to regain redox balance, reduce mortality in COVID-19 and other redox diseases, and provide opportunities to tackle Long-COVID. </p

Uncoupled redox stress: how a temporal misalignment of redox-regulated processes and circadian rhythmicity exacerbates the stressed state

Diurnal and seasonal rhythmicity, entrained by environmental and nutritional cues, is a vital part of all life on Earth operating at every level of organization; from individual cells, to multicellular organisms, whole ecosystems and societies. Redox processes are intrinsic to physiological function and circadian regulation, but how they are integrated with other regulatory processes at the whole-body level is poorly understood. Circadian misalignment triggered by a major stressor (e.g. viral infection with SARS-CoV-2) or recurring stressors of lesser magnitude such as shift work elicit a complex stress response that leads to desynchronization of metabolic processes. This in turn challenges the system's ability to achieve redox balance due to alterations in metabolic fluxes (redox rewiring). We infer that the emerging ‘alternative redox states' do not always revert readily to their evolved natural states; ‘Long COVID’ and other complex disorders of unknown aetiology are the clinical manifestations of such rearrangements. To better support and successfully manage bodily resilience to major stress and other redox challenges needs a clear perspective on the pattern of the hysteretic response for the interaction between the redox system and the circadian clock. Characterization of this system requires repeated (ideally continuous) recording of relevant clinical measures of the stress responses and whole-body redox state (temporal redox phenotyping). The human/animal body is a complex ‘system of systems’ with multi-level buffering capabilities, and it requires consideration of the wider dynamic context to identify a limited number of stress-markers suitable for routine clinical decision making. Systematically mapping the patterns and dynamics of redox biomarkers along the stressor/disease trajectory will provide an operational model of whole-body redox regulation/balance that can serve as basis for the identification of effective interventions which promote health by enhancing resilience