Details of the capture sessions of great tits in Wytham Woods (May 2009–November 2011).

*<p> <b>Trapping intensity gives the proportion of days within each capture session when trapping occurred.</b></p>†<p>‘trend’ = time since initial disease occurrence (in years). Also shown are the number of individuals captured, the apparent prevalence of pox per capture session (^{<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0038316#nt101" target="_blank">*</a>} indicates breeding seasons), and the number of diseased individuals of other Paridae species captured during the study (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0038316#pone-0038316-t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a> for more details).</p

Observed prevalence of pox in great tits (with 95% exact binomial confidence intervals).

<p>The solid line represents the fit of the predicted values from the final generalised additive model (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0038316#pone-0038316-t005" target="_blank">Table 5</a>). Dotted lines show 95% CI of the predicted prevalence estimates.</p

Results of models examining the influence of temporal/demographic factors on variation in pox prevalence.

<p>Values shown are the Z statistics (or <b>χ²</b> statistics for the smoothed term) and Wald's test P-values for coefficients, along with results of Likelihood ratio tests (LRT) (change in deviance: ΔDev, change in degrees of freedom: Δdf) comparing models with and without the specific term. Factors in bold were retained in the final model.</p

Details of birds that recovered from pox.

<p>Values shown are the intervals between the last disease capture and the first healthy capture of each recovered individual, along with the size and location of the original pox lesions.</p>†<p>This was the only recovered individual to be subsequently recaptured.</p

Details of birds captured twice with pox lesions.

<p>Values shown are the change in the size of lesions between capture occasions for individuals captured twice with disease.</p

Predicted pox prevalence in residents (solid lines) and immigrants (dashed lines) according to host age.

<p>(a) adults (1+ years of age) and (b) juveniles (<1 year). Light grey solid and dashed lines are the 95% CI of the estimates of the predicted prevalence for residents and immigrants respectively.</p

Nexus alignment of UK ranaviruses plus viruses which provide global context

This nexus alignment was used to construct the phylogeny in figure 5 of the attached publication. It is a concatenated alignment of seven partial open reading frames detailed in Price et al. (2014). The resulting phylogeny visualises relationships of UK ranaviruses in a global context

Reproductive performance measures for healthy and diseased great tit pairs at Wytham Woods.

<p>(a) average number of young fledged; (b) average number of independent young raised; (c) the proportion of pairs with at least one fledged young; (d) the proportion of pairs raising at least one independent young. Shown are the average estimates from the raw data (±95% CI).</p

The impacts of Paridae pox on reproductive performance of great tits.

<p>Results of model selection for the effects of parental disease status (PDS), lay date (LD), year, and local breeding density (Density) on measures of reproductive performance in great tits: (a) clutch size (CS), (b) the number of young alive at day 15 (NYoung), (c) the number of young fledged (NFledged), (d) whether any young fledged (FledgedY/N), (e) the number of independent young produced (NIndYoung) and (f) whether parents produced any independent young (IndYoungY/N). Estimates of coefficients of the linear predictors (on the link scale, with standard errors, SE) are shown along with the relevant test statistics (z/t) and their significance (P). Statistics for significant terms (P<0.05, shown in bold) are from the minimal model, other values are at the point at which that factor left the model.</p

Notation used to denote the main effects and model structure for multistate mark-recapture models.

<p>Notation used to denote the main effects and model structure for multistate mark-recapture models.</p