13 research outputs found
Pathological Heart Rate Regulation in Apparently Healthy Individuals
Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in adults worldwide. There is one common pathophysiological aspect present in all cardiovascular diseases—dysfunctional heart rhythm regulation. Taking this aspect into consideration for cardiovascular risk predictions opens important research perspectives, allowing for the development of preventive treatment techniques. The aim of this study was to find out whether certain pathologically appearing signs in the heart rate variability (HRV) of an apparently healthy person, even with high HRV, can be defined as biomarkers for a disturbed cardiac regulation and whether this can be treated preventively by a drug-free method. This multi-phase study included 218 healthy subjects of either sex, who consecutively visited the physician at Gesundheit clinic because of arterial hypertension, depression, headache, psycho-emotional stress, extreme weakness, disturbed night sleep, heart palpitations, or chest pain. In study phase A, baseline measurement to identify individuals with cardiovascular risks was done. Therefore, standard HRV, as well as the new cardiorhythmogram (CRG) method, were applied to all subjects. The new CRG analysis used here is based on the recently introduced LF drops and HF counter-regulation. Regarding the mechanisms of why these appear in a steady-state cardiorhythmmogram, they represent non-linear event-based dynamical HRV biomarkers. The next phase of the study, phase B, tested whether the pathologically appearing signs identified via CRG in phase A could be clinically influenced by drug-free treatment. In order to validate the new CRG method, it was supported by non-linear HRV analysis in both phase A and in phase B. Out of 218 subjects, the pathologically appearing signs could be detected in 130 cases (60%), p < 0.01, by the new CRG method, and by the standard HRV analysis in 40 cases (18%), p < 0.05. Thus, the CRG method was able to detect 42% more cases with pathologically appearing cardiac regulation. In addition, the comparative CRG analysis before and after treatment showed that the pathologically appearing signs could be clinically influenced without the use of medication. After treatment, the risk group decreased eight-fold—from 130 people to 16 (p < 0.01). Therefore, progression of the detected pathological signs to structural cardiac pathology or arrhythmia could be prevented in most of the cases. However, in the remaining risk group of 16 apparently healthy subjects, 8 people died due to all-cause mortality. In contrast, no other subject in this study has died so far. The non-linear parameter which is able to quantify the changes in CRGs before versus after treatment is FWRENYI4 (symbolic dynamic feature); it decreased from 2.85 to 2.53 (p < 0.001). In summary, signs of pathological cardiac regulation can be identified by the CRG analysis of apparently healthy subjects in the early stages of development of cardiac pathology. Thus, our method offers a sensitive biomarker for cardiovascular risks. The latter can be influenced by non-drug treatments (acupuncture) to stop the progression into structural cardiac pathologies or arrhythmias in most but not all of the patients. Therefore, this could be a real and easy-to-use supplemental method, contributing to primary prevention in cardiology.Peer Reviewe
Spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity: sequence method at rest does not quantify causal interactions but rather determines the heart rate to blood pressure variability ratio
Objective: In order to quantify spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) many groups use the sequence method (SME). In this paper we test the hypothesis that SME is quantifying causal interactions of pontaneous BRS at rest rather than, alternatively, being solely dominated by heart rate variability (HRV) and/or systolic blood pressure variability (BPV). Approach: Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed 1828 beat-to-beat time series and their corresponding systolic blood pressure during resting conditions. Main results: We found a high correlation between short-term HRV and the SME of baroreflex sensitivity of r = 0.85 (p < 0.001). The correlation is even higher between SME and the root mean square ratio of HRV and BPV (r = 0.93, p < 0.001). Surrogate analyses revealed that SME is not able to quantify causal relationships between both signals, it cannot differentiate between random and baroreflex driven sequences, and rather determines the HRV-BPV variability ratio. Significance: We conclude that SME has a potentially large methodological bias in the characterization of the capacity of the arterial baroreflex during resting conditions.Peer Reviewe
Recommended from our members
Instantaneous Cardiac Baroreflex Sensitivity: xBRS Method Quantifies Heart Rate Blood Pressure Variability Ratio at Rest and During Slow Breathing
Spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is a widely used tool for the quantification of the
cardiovascular regulation. Numerous groups use the xBRS method, which calculates
the cross-correlation between the systolic beat-to-beat blood pressure and the R-R
interval (resampled at 1 Hz) in a 10 s sliding window, with 0–5 s delays for the
interval. The delay with the highest correlation is selected and, if significant, the quotient
of the standard deviations of the R-R intervals and the systolic blood pressures is
recorded as the corresponding xBRS value. In this paper we test the hypothesis that the
xBRS method quantifies the causal interactions of spontaneous BRS from non-invasive
measurements at rest. We use the term spontaneous BRS in the sense of the sensitivity
curve is calculated from non-interventional, i.e., spontaneous, baroreceptor activity. This
study includes retrospective analysis of 1828 measurements containing ECG as well as
continues blood pressure under resting conditions. Our results show a high correlation
between the heart rate – systolic blood pressure variability (HRV/BPV) quotient and the
xBRS (r = 0.94, p < 0.001). For a deeper understanding we conducted two surrogate
analyses by substituting the systolic blood pressure by its reversed time series. These
showed that the xBRS method was not able to quantify causal relationships between the
two signals. It was not possible to distinguish between random and baroreflex controlled
sequences. It appears xBRS rather determines the HRV/BPV quotient. We conclude
that the xBRS method has a potentially large bias in characterizing the capacity of the
arterial baroreflex under resting conditions. During slow breathing, estimates for xBRS
are significantly increased, which clearly shows that measurements at rest only involve
limited baroreflex activity, but does neither challenge, nor show the full range of the
arterial baroreflex regulatory capacity. We show that xBRS is exclusively dominated
by the heart rate to systolic blood pressure ratio (r = 0.965, p < 0.001). Further
investigations should focus on additional autonomous testing procedures such as slow
breathing or orthostatic testing to provide a basis for a non-invasive evaluation of
baroreflex sensitivity.Peer Reviewe
Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunction and Incidence of de novo Atrial Fibrillation: Heart Rate Variability vs. Heart Rate Complexity
BackgroundThe REACT DX registry evaluates standard therapies to episodes of long-lasting atrial tachyarrhythmias and assesses the quality of sensing and stability of the lead and the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (BIOTRONIK Lumax VR-T DX and successors) over at least a 1-year follow-up period.
ObjectiveTo study the association between the risk of de novo device-detected atrial fibrillation (AF), the autonomic perturbations before the onset of paroxysmal AF and a 7-days heart rate variability (7dHRV) 1 month after ICD implantation.
MethodsThe registry consists of 234 patients implanted with an ICD, including 10 with de novo long-lasting atrial tachyarrhythmias with no prior history of AF. The patients were matched via the propensity-score methodology as well as for properties directly influencing the ECGs recorded using GE CardioMem CM 3000. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis was performed using standard parameters from time- and frequency-domains, and from non-linear dynamics.
ResultsNo linear HRV was associated with an increased risk of AF (p = n.s.). The only significant approach was derived from symbolic dynamics with the parameter “forbidden words” which distinguished both groups on all 7 days of measurements (p < 0.05), thereby quantifying the heart rate complexity (HRC) as drastically lower in the de novo AF group.
ConclusionCardiac autonomic dysfunction denoted by low HRC may be associated with higher AF incidence. For patients with mild to moderate heart failure, standard HRV parameters are not appropriate to quantify cardiac autonomic perturbations before the onset of AF. Further studies are needed to determine the individual risk for AF that would enable interventions to restore autonomic balance in the general population.Peer Reviewe