4 research outputs found

    3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Fixation of trochanteric hip fractures using the Gamma Nail has been performed since 1988 and is today well established and wide-spread. However, a number of reports have raised serious concerns about the implant's complication rate. The main focus has been the increased risk of a subsequent femoral shaft fracture and some authors have argued against its use despite other obvious advantages, when this implant is employed.</p> <p>Through access to a uniquely large patient data base available, which is available for analysis of trochanteric fractures; we have been able to evaluate the performance of the Gamma Nail over a twelve year period.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>3066 consecutive patients were treated for trochanteric fractures using Gamma Nails between 1990 and 2002 at the Centre de Traumatologie et de l'Orthopedie (CTO), Strasbourg, France. These patients were retrospectively analysed. Information on epidemiological data, intra- and postoperative complications and patients' outcome was retrieved from patient notes. All available radiographs were assessed by a single reviewer (AJB).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The results showed a low complication rate with the use of the Gamma Nail. There were 137 (4.5%) intraoperative fracture-related complications. Moreover 189 (6.2%) complications were detected postoperatively and during follow-up. Cut-out of the lag screw from the femoral head was the most frequent mechanical complication (57 patients, 1.85%), whereas a postoperative femoral shaft fracture occurred in 19 patients (0.6%). Other complications, such as infection, delayed healing/non-union, avascular femoral head necrosis and distal locking problems occurred in 113 patients (3.7%).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The use of the Gamma Nail in trochanteric hip fractures is a safe method with a low complication rate. In particular, a low rate of femoral shaft fractures was reported. The low complication rate reported in this series can probably be explained by strict adherence to a proper surgical technique.</p

    A new modular testing system for biomechanical evaluation of tibial intramedullary fixation devices

    No full text
    This biomechanical study was performed to evaluate a new modular, tibial testing system developed for analysis of tibial nails and their locking screws. A new testing system, consisting of five modules, was designed to simulate a tibia. For this study one module was removed to simulate a 55-mm distal tibial defect inducing maximum loading on the distal portion of the implant and locking bolts. The tibial load offsets were 23 mm proximally and 10 mm distally medial to the centreline of the tibial shaft to simulate the location of the expected resultant load during the peak loading and inversion torque on the ankle during the gait cycle. Four solid tibial nails (STN®, Stryker-Howmedica-Osteonics, Kiel, Germany) were tested to static failure and 15 nails were tested dynamically. Our results showed that the solid tibial nails fractured in the testing device in the same manner and location as they do in clinical series. Evaluation of the results showed the mean fatigue limit of the STN to be 1.4 kN for 500 000 cycles with a standard deviation (S.D.) of 0.33 kN. This biomechanical study establishes a standard technique for the biomechanical testing of tibial nails, in a clinically relevant manner, avoiding the inconsistency of cadaver bone tests. As it is a standardised test set-up this new modular testing system could serve as a standard by which small diameter tibial nails and other devices could be evaluated and compared with other systems currently in use
    corecore