18 research outputs found

    An Activity Index for Raw Accelerometry Data and Its Comparison with Other Activity Metrics - Fig 5

    Get PDF
    <p>Scatterplots of metabolic equivalents (METs) versus Activity Index (AI) (A), activity count (AC) (B), AC with Low Frequency Extension (LFE) (C) and Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) (D). MET is on <i>x</i>-axis for all four plots, while AI, AC, AC (LFE) and ENMO are on the <i>y</i>-axis in (A), (B), (C) and (D), respectively. Each point in the figure represents a participant's median METs during a certain activity (rendered in different colors) versus the median AI, AC or ENMO while he/she was performing the same activity.</p

    A general framework for accelerometer-related studies.

    No full text
    <p>The left panel illustrates two general data types: raw data and summary measures. The right panel shows 4 common research interests. The mid panel contains 6 common analysis pathways between the data and the research interests.</p

    Comparison of the boxplots of Activity Index (AI), activity count (AC), AC with Low Frequency Extention (LFE) and Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) during different types of activities.

    No full text
    <p>Outliers outside of the upper and lower whiskers are omitted. Each type of summary metric from all the participants were pooled together and plotted according to the type of activity.</p

    Minutes in Sedentary Bouts<sup>a</sup>, Per Day.

    No full text
    <p><sup>a</sup> Variables computed using daily-level data.</p><p><sup>b</sup> Means are adjusted for accelerometer wear time, physical functioning, depression, cognitive functioning, as well as age and gender where appropriate.</p><p><sup>c</sup> p-values were derived from F tests following linear mixed models that regressed sedentary time on measures of age, gender, physical functioning, cognitive functioning, depression and accelerometer wear time; Kenward-Roger approximations were used to estimate the denominator degrees of freedom.</p><p>Minutes in Sedentary Bouts<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0136161#t003fn001" target="_blank"><sup>a</sup></a>, Per Day.</p

    Change in FMD during sitting conditions.

    No full text
    <p>Condition-associated change in FMD is represented by the ratio of FMD 2 (end of sitting period) to FMD 1 (baseline) and are shown by group (Panels A and B) and by individual (Panels C and D) using raw data (Panels A and C) and allometrically scaled data (Panels B and D) (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0188544#sec007" target="_blank">Materials and Methods</a> section). An FMD 2–to–FMD 1 ratio greater than 1 (dotted, horizontal line) indicates that the FMD response was greater at the completion of the sitting period relative to baseline. Box and whisker plots (Panels A and B): x = mean, line = median, dots above boxes are outliers. n = 10 for the control, 2-minute walking every hour, and 10-minute standing every hour conditions; n = 9 for the 2-minute standing every 20 minutes condition. <i>p</i>-value vs. the control condition. * Statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. Bonferroni-corrected cut-off for significance in 3-arm comparison with control was <i>p</i>< 0.0167.</p
    corecore