15 research outputs found

    Carcinosarcoma of the colon: report of a case with morphological, ultrastructural and molecular analysis

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Carcinosarcoma of the colon is a rare histopathological entity with uncertain histogenesis, that shows both epithelial and mesenchymal malignant differentiation. Carcinosarcoma rarely affects the gastrointestinal tract and only few cases are reported in the colon. Herein we describe a carcinosarcoma of the ascending colon, with morphological, ultrastructural and molecular analysis. CASE PRESENTATION: An 81-year-old man was hospitalised for asthenia, weight loss and iron-deficiency anaemia. The patient underwent colonoscopy and adenocarcinoma was diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy. A right hemicolectomy was performed and, during surgical operation, liver metastases were detected. Histological examination of the surgical specimen revealed areas of both carcinomatous and sarcomatous differentiation, completely separated by fibrous septae. The sarcomatous component exhibited areas of smooth muscle and osteoblastic differentiation, with focal osteoid material deposition. Molecular analysis conducted separately on the epithelial and mesenchymal components revealed the same p53 gene mutation (R282W in exon 8) and identical polymorphisms in p53 exon 4, in EGFR exons 20 and 21, and in c-kit exon 17. Microsatellite markers analysis revealed a common loss of heterozygosis on 18q. Overall, the data are consistent with a common origin of the two tumor components. The patient was treated with 8 cycles of oral capecitabine (1250 mg/m(2 )twice a day for 14 days repeated every 28 days) and two years after surgery is alive with liver metastases. CONCLUSION: Carcinosarcoma of the colon is a rare tumour with both epithelial and sarcomatous components. Molecular analysis of the current case suggests the histogenesis from a common cell progenitor

    Prognostic Markers of Microinvasive Breast Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Get PDF
    (1) Background: The prognostic factors of microinvasive (≤1 mm) breast carcinoma are not completely clear. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify these factors. (2) Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was followed. Two databases were interrogated, PubMed and Embase, and papers in English were included to address this question. The selected studies were those that reported on female patients affected by microinvasive carcinoma, and on prognostic factors with a hazard ratio (HR) for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). (3) Results: In total, 618 records were identified. After removing duplicates (166), identification, and screening (336 by title and abstract alone, 116 by full text and eventual supplementary material), 5 papers were selected. Seven different meta-analyses were conducted in this study, all referring to DFS, analyzing the following prognostic factors: estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2 status, multifocality and grade of microinvasion, patient’s age, and lymph node status. Only lymph node status was associated with prognosis and DFS (total number of cases: 1528; Z = 1.94; p = 0.05). The other factors examined did not significantly affect prognosis (p > 0.05). (4) Conclusions: Positive lymph node status significantly worsens prognosis in patients with microinvasive breast carcinoma

    Role of evaluating tumor‑infiltrating lymphocytes, programmed death‑1 ligand 1 and mismatch repair proteins expression in malignant mesothelioma

    Get PDF
    The tumor immune microenvironment (TME) and immune checkpoints have been reported to serve a role in the pathogenesis of malignant mesothelioma (MM) and treatment outcome. Additionally, mismatch Repair (MMR) deficiency appears to enhance the response to checkpoints blockade in several tumors. The aim of the present study was to analyze programmed death‑1 ligand 1 (PD‑L1) expression in MM and to characterize the TME. This could help to understand the immune response, and evaluate its prognostic and predictive values. We also investigated MMR protein expression. We retrospectively analyzed 55 mesotheliomas to determine PD‑L1, CD4+, CD8+, mutL homolog 1 (MLH1), mutS homolog 2 (MSH2), mutS homolog 6 (MSH6) and PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component (PMS2) expression. We used an immunoscore (1+, 2+ and 3+) to evaluate tumor‑infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). TILs were observed in all but two samples (53/55); the majority had an immunoscore 1+ (30/53), while 2+/3+ was reported for 23/53 samples. A predominance of CD8+ was highlighted in 8 cases (15%). PD‑L1 expression of ≥1% on tumor cells was displayed in 40 cases; in 9 of these, ≥50% expression was reported. Of note, alterations in MMR staining was not observed. In addition, survival analysis revealed that epithelioid subtype was associated with better prognosis. We observed a trend towards poorer prognosis for ≥50% PD‑L1 expression on tumor cells, lower immunoscore (1+) and CD8+ TIL predominance. The present study highlighted the importance of exploring the TME and the standardization of PD‑L1 assessment guidelines to apply in the field of immunotherapy

    Marcatori Immunoistochimici e Molecolari ad impatto prognostico e predittivo di risposta alla terapia in ambito neoplastico

    Get PDF
    Traditional morphological examinations are not anymore sufficient for a complete evaluation of tumoral tissue and the use of neoplastic markers is of utmost importance. Neoplastic markers can be classified in: diagnostic, prognostic and predictive markers. Three markers were analyzed. 1) Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2) was immunohistochemically examined in prostatic tissues: 40 radical prostatectomies from hormonally untreated patients with their preoperative biopsies, 10 radical prostatectomies from patients under complete androgen ablation before surgery and 10 simple prostatectomies from patients with bladder outlet obstruction. Results were compared with α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR). IGFBP2 was expressed in the cytoplasm of untreated adenocarcinomas and, to a lesser extent, in HG-PIN; the expression was markedly lower in patients after complete androgen ablation. AMACR was similarly expressed in both adenocarcinoma and HG-PIN, the level being similar in both lesions; the expression was slightly lower in patients after complete androgen ablation. IGFBP2 may be used a diagnostic marker of prostatic adenocarcinomas. 2) Heparan surface proteoglycan immunohistochemical expression was examined in 150 oral squamous cell carcinomas. Follow up information was available in 93 patients (range: 6-34 months, mean: 19±7). After surgery, chemotherapy was performed in 8 patients and radiotherapy in 61 patients. Multivariate and univariate overall survival analyses showed that high expression of syndecan-1 (SYN-1) was associated with a poor prognosis. In patients treated with radiotherapy, such association was higher. SYN-1 is a prognostic marker in oral squamous cell carcinomas; it may also represent a predictive factor for responsiveness to radiotherapy. 3) EGFR was studied in 33 pulmonary adenocarcinomas with traditional DNA sequencing methods and with two mutation-specific antibodies. Overall, the two antibodies had 61.1% sensitivity and 100% specificity in detecting EGFR mutations. EGFR mutation-specific antibodies may represent a predictive marker to identify patients candidate to tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy

    Immunohistochemistry for Claudin-4 and BAP1 in the Differential Diagnosis between Sarcomatoid Carcinoma and Sarcomatoid Mesothelioma

    No full text
    (1) Background. In the differential diagnosis between sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC) and sarcomatoid mesothelioma (SM), we aimed to investigate the role of Claudin-4 and BAP1, a panel recently used to distinguish conventional carcinoma from epithelioid mesothelioma. (2) Methods. We collected 41 surgical pleural biopsies of SM, 46 surgical resections of SC from different sites and 49 pleural biopsies of normal/hyperplastic mesothelium. All the cases were tested for Claudin-4 and BAP1 using immunohistochemistry. The statistical calculations of the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were performed. (3) Results: Claudin-4 was negative in 41/41 SMs, while it was positive in 18/36 (50.1%) SCs (eight diffusely, 10 focally) within their sarcomatous component. BAP1 was lost in 23/41 SMs, while it was regularly expressed in 46/46 SCs. All the cases of the normal/hyperplastic mesothelium were negative for Claudin-4 and retained the regular expression of BAP1. The Claudin-4 expression was useful for detecting SC (sensitivity, 39.1%; specificity, 100%) and the BAP1 loss was useful for diagnosing SM (sensitivity, 56.1%; specificity, 100%). (4) Conclusions. The staining for Claudin-4 and BAP1 exhibited a low/moderate sensitivity in diagnosing SC and SM (39.1% and 56.1%, respectively), but a very high specificity (100%). Claudin-4 was expressed only in SC and BAP1 loss was noted only in SM

    EGFR mutation-specific antibodies in pulmonary adenocarcinoma: A comparison with DNA direct sequencing

    No full text
    Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations are usually detected by direct sequencing to identify patients with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinomas as candidates for tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of EGFR mutation-specific antibodies in identifying EGFR-mutated adenocarcinomas. Materials and Methods: Thirty-three consecutive cases of pulmonary adenocarcinomas sequenced for EGFR mutations were retrieved from our files. Immunohistochemistry was performed with the rabbit monoclonal antibodies E746- A750del (6B6) and L858R (43B2). The results obtained using the 2 procedures were statistically compared by Coehn k and by calculation of sensitivity and specificity. Results: There were 21 women and 12 men, ranging in age from 48 to 78 years. All cases were lung adenocarcinomas, 23 primaries and 10 metastatic. The mutational spectrum was as follows: 12 cases mutated in exon 19 (9 with E746-A750del, 1 with homozygote L747-T751del, 1 with L747-P753del, 1 with E747-S752del), 6 in exon 21 (5 with L858R, 1 with L861Q+L862L), and 15 EGFR wild type. Immunohistochemistry detected 6/9 cases with an E746-A750del mutation (\u3ba=0.744, sensitivity: 66.7%, specificity: 100%) and 5/5 cases with an L858R mutation (\u3ba=1, sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 100%). Four cases showed faint and focal immunostaining and were interpreted as negative. All other cases were negative. Overall, the 2 antibodies had 61.1% sensitivity and 100% specificity for EGFR mutations. Copyright \ua9 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

    Gene mutations in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC): Results of a panel of 6 genes in a cohort of Italian patients

    No full text
    Background: No target therapies are presently available in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We investigated the presence of potentially drugable mutations in the EGFR, c-MET, BRAF, KRAS, PDGFRa and c-KIT genes in a retrospective series of SCLC from 2 Italian Institutions. Correlations with immunohistochemical, clinical and outcome features were evaluated. Materials and methods: Genes were studied by direct sequencing of DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. Immunohistochemical expression of TTF-1, p63, chromogranin, synaptophysin, CD56 and bcl-2 was assessed. Results: Samples from 113 SCLC patients were analyzed. All cases were wild-type for BRAF, KRAS, PDGFRa and c-KIT (data available for 82 patients). Two (1.8%) patients were EGFR-mutated (exon 19 delE746-A750 and exon 21 L858R); both were females, non-smoker and had limited disease. Overall survival of EGFR-mutated patients was 21 months as compared to 11 months in wild-type. Five (4.4%) patients were c-MET-mutated (4 on exon 14: 2 R988C, 1 D990N, 1 D102Y; 1 on exon 17 R1166Q); all were smokers, 3 were males and 4 had extensive disease. Their OS was comparable to wild-type cases (12 vs. 11 months). EGFR and c-MET mutations were mutually exclusive. Gene mutations did not correlate with immunophenotype. Conclusions: Targetable mutations are uncommon in SCLC. EGFR-mutated patients tended to be female and non-smoker and experienced a prolonged OS suggesting a possible positive prognostic effect. c-MET mutations did not affect survival. Target therapy might be considered in EGFR and c-MET-mutated patients
    corecore