25 research outputs found
BMP axis in cancer cachexia
BACKGROUND
Cancer cachexia is a devastating metabolic syndrome characterized by systemic inflammation and massive muscle and adipose tissue wasting. Although cancer cachexia is responsible for about 25% of cancer deaths, no effective therapies are available, and the underlying mechanisms have not been fully elucidated.
Its occurrence complicates patients’ management, reduces tolerance to treatments and negatively affects patient quality of life. Muscle wasting, mainly due to increased protein breakdown rates, is one of the most prominent features of cachexia. Blocking muscle loss in cachexia mouse models dramatically prolongs survival even of animals in which tumor growth is not inhibited.
Recent observations showed that bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling, acting through Smad1, Smad5 and Smad8 (Smad1/5/8), is a master regulator of muscle homeostasis. BMP-Smad1/5/8 axis negatively regulates a novel ubiquitin ligase (MUSA1) required for muscle loss induced by denervation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
First aim of the present work was to test if alterations of the BMP signaling pathway occur in cancer-induced muscle wasting in patients. For this purpose we checked the state of activation of the BMP pathway in muscle of cachectic vs non–cachectic patients affected by colon, pancreatic and esophagus cancer and in control subjects. We checked by Western Blot the phosphorylation levels of Smad1/5/8 and of Smad3 and by quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) the expression levels of different atrophy-related genes The second aim was to evaluate the degree of muscle atrophy and distribution of muscle fibers in patients and control subjects using morphometric and immunohistochemical analyses. We also performed analysis on distribution of NCAM positive muscle fibers to assess the effect of denervation on muscle tropism.
RESULTS
From December 2014 we collected 95 rectus abdominis muscle biopsies of cancer patients and 11 from control subjects. In line with the results we obtained in C26 mice model (a well-established cancer cachexia experimental model) Smad1/5/8 phosphorylation, readout of the state of activation of the BMP pathway, was nearly completely abrogated in the muscles of cancer cachectic patients compared to cancer non-cachectic ones. Interestingly, the level of phosphorylation of Smad3 was not significantly affected suggesting specific effects of cancer growth on BMP pathway. The expression levels of different atrophy-related genes including MUSA1 were induced in the cachectic muscles. Interestingly, several BMP related genes are also changing the expression during cancer growth. We also found a correlation between suppression of BMP pathway, expression of atrophy related genes and Noggin, known to block BMP pathway.
Morphometric analysis shown that patients with cancer cachexia have smaller myofiber diameter (in particular fast type fibers) in comparison to age-matched controls. In skeletal muscle from cancer patients (either cachectic or non-cachectic) we detected a prevalence of flat shaped, angulated and severely atrophic myofibers (i.e. morphological features of denervated myofibers), big fiber-type grouping (i.e. typical hallmark of denervation/reinnervation events) and numerous NCAM positive myofibers (i.e. specific marker of denervation).
CONCLUSIONS
These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that BMP inhibition is permissive to cachexia onset. Since the reactivation of the BMP-dependent signaling and MUSA1 suppression was sufficient to prevent tumor-induced muscle atrophy in our C26 mouse model (data not shown), the present data suggest that the BMP axis can be an effective target for therapeutic approaches to counteract cachexia also in cancer patients.
The results of morphometric and immunohistochemical studies collected till now may suggest that denervation contributes to myofiber atrophy in cancer cachexia
A new class of glycomimetic drugs to prevent free fatty acid-induced endothelial dysfunction
Background: Carbohydrates play a major role in cell signaling in many biological processes. We have developed a set of glycomimetic drugs that mimic the structure of carbohydrates and represent a novel source of therapeutics for endothelial dysfunction, a key initiating factor in cardiovascular complications. Purpose: Our objective was to determine the protective effects of small molecule glycomimetics against free fatty acidinduced endothelial dysfunction, focusing on nitric oxide (NO) and oxidative stress pathways. Methods: Four glycomimetics were synthesized by the stepwise transformation of 2,5dihydroxybenzoic acid to a range of 2,5substituted benzoic acid derivatives, incorporating the key sulfate groups to mimic the interactions of heparan sulfate. Endothelial function was assessed using acetylcholineinduced, endotheliumdependent relaxation in mouse thoracic aortic rings using wire myography. Human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) behavior was evaluated in the presence or absence of the free fatty acid, palmitate, with or without glycomimetics (1µM). DAF2 and H2DCFDA assays were used to determine nitric oxide (NO) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, respectively. Lipid peroxidation colorimetric and antioxidant enzyme activity assays were also carried out. RTPCR and western blotting were utilized to measure Akt, eNOS, Nrf2, NQO1 and HO1 expression. Results: Ex vivo endotheliumdependent relaxation was significantly improved by the glycomimetics under palmitateinduced oxidative stress. In vitro studies showed that the glycomimetics protected HUVECs against the palmitateinduced oxidative stress and enhanced NO production. We demonstrate that the protective effects of preincubation with glycomimetics occurred via upregulation of Akt/eNOS signaling, activation of the Nrf2/ARE pathway, and suppression of ROSinduced lipid peroxidation. Conclusion: We have developed a novel set of small molecule glycomimetics that protect against free fatty acidinduced endothelial dysfunction and thus, represent a new category of therapeutic drugs to target endothelial damage, the first line of defense against cardiovascular disease
Concomitance of Polymorphisms in Glutathione Transferase Omega Genes Is Associated with Risk of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Combined GSTM1-Null, GSTT1-Active, GSTA1 Low-Activity and GSTP1-Variant Genotype Is Associated with Increased Risk of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.
The aim of this study was to evaluate specific glutathione S-transferase (GST) gene variants as determinants of risk in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (cRCC), independently or simultaneously with established RCC risk factors, as well as to discern whether phenotype changes reflect genotype-associated risk. GSTA1, GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTT1 genotypes were determined in 199 cRCC patients and 274 matched controls. Benzo(a)pyrene diolepoxide (BPDE)-DNA adducts were determined in DNA samples obtained from cRCC patients by ELISA method. Significant association between GST genotype and risk of cRCC development was found for the GSTM1-null and GSTP1-variant genotype (p = 0.02 and p<0.001, respectively). Furthermore, 22% of all recruited cRCC patients were carriers of combined GSTM1-null, GSTT1-active, GSTA1-low activity and GSTP1-variant genotype, exhibiting 9.32-fold elevated cRCC risk compared to the reference genotype combination (p = 0.04). Significant association between GST genotype and cRCC risk in smokers was found only for the GSTP1 genotype, while GSTM1-null/GSTP1-variant/GSTA1 low-activity genotype combination was present in 94% of smokers with cRCC, increasing the risk of cRCC up to 7.57 (p = 0.02). Furthermore, cRCC smokers with GSTM1-null genotype had significantly higher concentration of BPDE-DNA adducts in comparison with GSTM1-active cRCC smokers (p = 0.05). GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTA1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms might be associated with the risk of cRCC, with special emphasis on GSTM1-null and GSTP1-variant genotypes. Combined GSTM1-null, GSTT1-active, GSTA1 low activity and GSTP1-variant genotypes might be considered as "risk-carrying genotype combination" in cRCC
Does occupational exposure to solvents and pesticides in association with glutathione S-transferase A1, M1, P1, and T1 polymorphisms increase the risk of bladder cancer? The Belgrade case-control study.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the role of the glutathione S-transferase A1, M1, P1 and T1 gene polymorphisms and potential effect modification by occupational exposure to different chemicals in Serbian bladder cancer male patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A hospital-based case-control study of bladder cancer in men comprised 143 histologically confirmed cases and 114 age-matched male controls. Deletion polymorphism of glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 was identified by polymerase chain reaction method. Single nucleotide polymorphism of glutathione S-transferase A1 and P1 was identified by restriction fragment length polymorphism method. As a measure of effect size, odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was calculated. RESULTS: The glutathione S-transferase A1, T1 and P1 genotypes did not contribute independently toward the risk of bladder cancer, while the glutathione S-transferase M1-null genotype was overrepresented among cases (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1-4.2, p = 0.032). The most pronounced effect regarding occupational exposure to solvents and glutathione S-transferase genotype on bladder cancer risk was observed for the low activity glutathione S-transferase A1 genotype (OR = 9.2, 95% CI = 2.4-34.7, p = 0.001). The glutathione S-transferase M1-null genotype also enhanced the risk of bladder cancer among subjects exposed to solvents (OR = 6,5, 95% CI = 2.1-19.7, p = 0.001). The risk of bladder cancer development was 5.3-fold elevated among glutathione S-transferase T1-active patients exposed to solvents in comparison with glutathione S-transferase T1-active unexposed patients (95% CI = 1.9-15.1, p = 0.002). Moreover, men with glutathione S-transferase T1-active genotype exposed to pesticides exhibited 4.5 times higher risk in comparison with unexposed glutathione S-transferase T1-active subjects (95% CI = 0.9-22.5, p = 0.067). CONCLUSION: Null or low-activity genotypes of the glutathione S-transferase A1, T1, and P1 did not contribute independently towards the risk of bladder cancer in males. However, in association with occupational exposure, low activity glutathione S-transferase A1 and glutathione S-transferase M1-null as well as glutathione S-transferase T1-active genotypes increase individual susceptibility to bladder cancer
Glutathione S-transferase T1, O1 and O2 polymorphisms are associated with survival in muscle invasive bladder cancer patients.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of six glutathione transferase (GST) gene polymorphisms (GSTT1, GSTP1/rs1695, GSTO1/rs4925, GSTO2/rs156697, GSTM1, GSTA1/rs3957357) with the survival of patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer and the genotype modifying effect on chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 105 patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer were included in the study. The follow-up lasted 5 years. The effect of GSTs polymorphisms on predicting mortality was analyzed by the Cox proportional hazard models, while Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess differences in survival. RESULTS: GSTT1 active, GSTO1 Asp140Asp or GSTO2 Asp142Asp genotypes were independent predictors of a higher risk of death among bladder cancer patients (HR = 2.5, P = 0.028; HR = 2.9, P = 0.022; HR = 3.9, P = 0.001; respectively) and significantly influenced the overall survival. There was no association between GSTP1, GSTM1 and GSTA1 gene variants with overall mortality. Only GSTO2 polymorphism showed a significant effect on the survival in the subgroup of patients who received chemotherapy (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: GSTT1 active genotype and GSTO1 Asp140Asp and GSTO2 Asp142Asp genotypes may have a prognostic/pharmacogenomic role in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer
<i>GST</i> genotypes in relation to the risk of cRCC.
<p><i>GST</i> genotypes in relation to the risk of cRCC.</p
Baseline characteristic of patients with cRCC and respective controls.
<p>Baseline characteristic of patients with cRCC and respective controls.</p
Combined effect of <i>GST</i> genotypes on risk of cRCC.
<p>Combined effect of <i>GST</i> genotypes on risk of cRCC.</p
PCR: primer sequences, PCR conditions, restriction enzymes and fragment lengths.
<p>PCR: primer sequences, PCR conditions, restriction enzymes and fragment lengths.</p