Hepatitis B virus genotypes and drug resistance mutations circulating in blood donors in Beira, Mozambique.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infects nearly 300 million people and is the leading cause of hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide. Despite the high burden of HBV in sub-Saharan Africa, countries such as Mozambique have limited data available on circulating HBV genotypes and the presence of drug resistance mutations. Blood donors from Beira, Mozambique were tested for HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBV DNA at the Instituto Nacional de Saúde in Maputo, Mozambique. Regardless of HBsAg status, donors with detectable HBV DNA were evaluated for HBV genotype. PCR was performed with primers amplifying a 2.1-2.2 kilobase fragment of the HBV genome. PCR products were submitted for next generation sequencing (NGS), and consensus sequences were evaluated for HBV genotype, recombination, and the presence or absence of drug resistance mutations. Of the 1281 blood donors tested, 74 had quantifiable HBV DNA. The polymerase gene could be amplified from 45 of 58 (77.6%) individuals with chronic HBV infection and 12 of 16 (75%) with occult HBV infection. Among these 57, 51 (89.5%) sequences belonged to HBV genotype A1, while 6 (10.5%) were HBV genotype E. All genotype E sequences were E/A recombinants, and clustered separately from other genotype E references. Genotype A samples had a median viral load of 637 IU/mL, while genotype E samples had a median viral load of 476,084 IU/mL. No drug resistance mutations were observed in the consensus sequences. The current study demonstrates the genotypic diversity of HBV in blood donors in Mozambique, but the absence of dominant (consensus) drug resistance mutations. Studies in other at-risk populations are essential for understanding the epidemiology, risk of liver disease, and likelihood of treatment resistance in resource-limited settings

Nucleic acid testing identifies high prevalence of blood borne viruses among approved blood donors in Mozambique.

BackgroundAlthough blood transfusion is an intervention that saves lives, it poses significant risks to the blood receivers, including the transmission of bloodborne pathogens. We aimed at determining the prevalence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B virus (HBV), and Hepatitis C virus (HCV) in candidates approved for blood donation, and in samples considered to be negative in reference blood banks in Mozambique.MethodsA cross-sectional study was performed between November 2014 and October 2015 in Maputo and Beira cities. Demographic information was obtained from all consenting blood donors using a structured questionnaire. Plasma samples were screened for HIVAb/Ag combinations, HBsAg and Anti-HCV. Blood donors considered to be negative by serological testing were re-tested in pools of six plasma samples using nucleic acid testing (NAT).ResultsMost blood donors were male 2,320 (83.4%) with an age range of 18 to 34 years. The overall seroprevalence of HIV, HBV and HCV infections among blood donors approved for donation was 4.6% (127; 95% CI 3.8-5.4), 4.5% (124; 95% CI 3.7-5.3) and 0.4% (11; 95% CI 0.2-0.7), respectively. The overall frequency by NAT of HIV RNA, HBV DNA, and HCV RNA in serologically negative blood donor samples was 2.6 per 1000 blood donors (7; 95% CI 1.1-5.4); 12.5 per 1000 blood donors (33; 95% CI 8.6-17.5) and 2.6 per 1000 blood donors (6; 95% CI 1.0-5.7), respectively.ConclusionOur results show high seroprevalence of HIV and HBV infections in blood donors approved for donation, and high frequency of molecular biomarkers of HIV, HBV, and HCV in blood considered to be safe. These results suggest the need for a new blood screening policy in Mozambique, including the use of NAT to detect infectious blood donations during the immunologically negative window

Accurate HIV viral load measurement in primary health care settings using the cobas® plasma separation card.

INTRODUCTION:Plasma is considered the gold standard for HIV viral load (VL) testing, however its use is challenging due to the need for phlebotomy and centrifugation services, as well as cold chain for transporting to laboratories for testing. The use of Dried Blood Spot (DBS) specimen has allowed a rapid expansion of antiretroviral therapy (ART) monitoring in remote areas in many African countries, however, the VL in DBS may overestimate the copies of viral RNA result at the clinically relevant range of 1000 copies/ml, due to proviral DNA and intracellular RNA. The characteristics of the cobas® Plasma Separation Card (PSC) specimen are similar to fresh plasma (gold standard), so a better performance of HIV VL is expetected in PSC specimen and can be an alternative to DBS. This study aims to evaluate the performance of cobas® PSC for VL testing at primary health care facilities in Mozambique. METHODOLOGY:HIV-1 infected adults on ART were enrolled consecutively in two health facilities in Mozambique, between August 2018 and October 2018. Capillary and venous cobas® PSC, DBS and fresh plasma specimens were collected from each patient. All specimens were tested for VL using CAP/CTM v2.0. Sensitivity and specificity of viral load using DBS, capillary and venous PSC specimens were estimated. Viral load obtained in fresh plasma specimen was used as reference and a threshold of 1000 copies/ml was considered for the analyses. RESULTS:From the total 613 patients included for the study, 2444 specimens including DBS (613), plasma (613), venous cobas® PSC (609) and capillary cobas® PSC (609) were collected and 2407 results were obtained. Sensitivity and specificity of the VL using venous cobas®PSC specimen at 1000 copies/ml threshold were 99.8% and 98.1% respectively, whereas for capillary cobas® PSC sensitivity was 99.6% and specificity was 97.2%. For DBS VL, sensitivity was 96.9% and specificity was 81.8%. Misclassification rate was more prominent in DBS specimens (5.9%), but lower in venous and capillary cobas®PSC with a rate of 0.3% and 0.7% respectively. CONCLUSION:The cobas® PSC specimen has improved performance over DBS for more accurate VL testing aligned with plasma testing. The use of this specimen type can increase the rates of reliable VL results and this will improve the quality of VL monitoring of HIV-positive patients in low-income settings

HBV infection in untreated HIV-infected adults in Maputo, Mozambique.

HIV/ HBV coinfected patients are at high risk of developing chronic HBV infection, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. In Mozambique, where HIV prevalence is one of the highest in the world, HIV-infected patients are scarcely characterized in terms of HBV coinfection and 3TC-resistance mutations profile.To characterize ART-naïve HIV-infected adults, with and without HBV coinfection, a cross-sectional study was conducted between May and November 2012 in two health centers from Maputo city, Mozambique. Subjects were consecutively enrolled in the study and, then, tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Moreover, CD4+ T cells count, HBV DNA in plasma, HBV genotyping and 3TC-resistance mutations profile of HBV were assessed in HIV/HBV coinfected patients.In total, 518 patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 33 years old and 66.8% were women. The median CD4+ T cells count was 361 cells/mm3 and 47 (9.1%) were coinfected with HBV. Out of 46 coinfected patients, 24 (55.2%) had HBV DNA ≥ 20 - 2.0 was reported in 4.3% of coinfected and 1.7% of monoinfected patients (p = 0.228), while FIB-4 > 3.25 was reported in 4.4% of coinfected and 1.3% of monoinfected patients (p = 0.112). Genotype A was the most frequent, identified in 25/27 (92.6%) patients, whereas genotype E was present in 2/27 (7.4%) patients. No patient had 3TC-resistance mutations.This study showed that HBV coinfection was prevalent among ART-naïve HIV-infected adults in Mozambique. Overall, these data highlight the importance of screening HBV coinfection as an integrated measure of HIV routine care to improve health conditions and treatment of HIV/HBV coinfected patients

Comparison of sociodemographic, risk factors and clinical characteristics between mono-infected and coinfected participants.

<p>Comparison of sociodemographic, risk factors and clinical characteristics between mono-infected and coinfected participants.</p

Flowchart of participant’s recruitment and testing.

<p>The flow chart depicts the naïve HIV-infected patients enrolled in the study from two health centers in Maputo, between May and November 2012. Abbreviations: ARV–antiretroviral treatment; HBV VL–Hepatitis B viral load.</p

Comparison of laboratory characteristics between coinfected and mono-infected patients.

<p>Comparison of laboratory characteristics between coinfected and mono-infected patients.</p