Destruction, Reconstruction, and Remembrance: Exploring \u27Memory\u27 and \u27Environment\u27 through Pennsylvania World War I Memorials in France

After examining the substantial efforts at land reclamation and environmental mitigation accompanying the State of Pennsylvania’s construction of memorials after World War I in France, I discovered a strong relationship between post-war memorialization and environmental mitigation in the areas in which the environmental consequences of WWI continue to affect humans and wildlife. My research illuminates how cultural impulses to build memorials that acknowledged the vast losses, acts of valor, and victories heavily influenced mitigation of France’s ecologically damaged Western Front. Many of France’s former battlefields, particularly in the devastated area known as the Red Zone, weren’t accessible to visitors before memorial-related mitigation efforts began in the 1920s. Even today, the Red Zone in France and Belgium, defined by millions of unfilled craters and unexploded ordnance, remains in place due to the cost and dangers involved with clean-up. Yet, when mitigation does occur in these devastated areas, it is still done with the intention to create memorial structures or spaces. Despite this, large expanses of agricultural land were never re-ploughed, many villages were never rebuilt, the prohibition against living in the Red Zone is still in effect, and WWI’s environmental consequences still persist in harmful ways, particularly affecting agriculture and tourism, the Western Front’s most lucrative industries. I approach environmental mitigation of warzones holistically in a way that treats people, land, and places of cultural significance as interconnected and context-dependent, a perspective that is under-studied in the existing scholarship on memorials and mitigation. My research has allowed me to analyze the crucial problem of war’s lasting effects on the environment through a novel perspective rooted in historical and cultural ecology. Concentrating on the construction of memorials as the focal points of returning damaged land to productive use has enabled me to conceptualize war’s environmental legacy through spaces of memorialization and the repair work done there

Understanding Behavioral Responses of Wildlife to Traffic to Improve Mitigation Planning

Creating and maintaining sustainable transportation systems depends in part on understanding and mitigating ecological impacts. Wildlife crossing structures (WCS) are often used to mitigate impacts on wildlife populations. WCS and existing structures may provide passage for multiple species, depending on their sensitivity to traffic disturbance and perception of the roadway. In a previous project, the research team found that traffic conditions and traffic noise could reduce WCS effectiveness in facilitating passage of diverse and sensitive species. In the current project, they expanded the geographic scope to 26 sites throughout California, including detailed measurements of vehicle noise and lighting impacts on wildlife use of structures. They investigated individual animal behavior as the animals approached structures as a possible mechanism for reducing species diversity due to traffic disturbance. In order to inform future WCS planning, placement and construction, the team studied traffic noise and light impacts on wildlife in the vicinity of the proposed Liberty Canyon wildlife over-crossing (over US 101), the first and largest of its kind in California. They improved a preliminary statistical model of the effects of traffic on WCS use of existing structures. The authors recommend strategies for transportation agencies to use in developing and modifying WCS to improve wildlife passage.View the NCST Project Webpag

Highlights of the economy of the Chattahoochee-Flint area.

Issued as Project E-233-02

Industrial districts in Georgia : a directory

Issued as Project no. E-400-90

Exploring the development of ‘understanding’ in high-level youth soccer players

Background: Developing understanding, and tactical understanding in particular, is an important goal for coaches in high-level youth sport. Deeper understanding can be associated with metacognition, which in soccer, is suggestive of players who can outwit the opponent by strategising. Although attractive, however, the construct is difficult to operationalise and hence, is seen as a challenging area, albeit a crucial one. Purposes: This study tested how one team of under 13–14 academy players’ depth of understanding changed using a mixed methods approach with data collection over 18-months. Methods: Players’ (n = 10) experienced a metacognitive coaching method, Digital Video Game Design (DVGD) throughout the study duration. Testing occurred on four occasions using Applied Cognitive Task Analysis (ACTA) to elicit how player thinking when playing evolved, combined with a Game Understanding (GU) comparative rating scale. In parallel, players’ coaches (n = 3) completed quantitative measurement of GU. Quantitative data analysis employed a repeated measures ANOVA whilst. Qualitative analysis of ACTA interviews used a deductive framework focussed on metacognitive skills and strategy. Findings: Players’ depth of understanding significantly improved during and post exposure to the metacognitive coaching method. Post the initial intervention, understanding showed further improvements at a steady but not significant rate. Qualitative findings indicated that players’ metacognition became more sophisticated, with a particular improvement in strategising based on team mates and opponent’s capabilities. The most dominant metacognitive skills were planning and problem setting, whilst information gathering was least deployed. Conclusions: Results show that young players are capable of rapidly developing metacognitive skills and strategy. Sports should upskill their coach education workforce to enhance their understanding of metacognition and its role within GU.</p

Is screening for lead poisoning justified?

Evidence is insufficient to recommend for or against universal screening of young children for lead poisoning in high- prevalence communities (strength of recommendation [SOR]: C). In low-prevalence communities, evidence is insufficient to recommend for or against a targeted screening approach, employing locale-specific demographic risk factors and personal risk questionnaires to inform screening decisions (SOR: C). Although evidence does not suggest that treatment of individuals with elevated blood lead levels improves individual outcomes, public health strategies aimed at decreasing lead in the environment appear to have resulted in a significant decline in the number of children with elevated blood lead levels in recent decades. One could thus argue that screening may identify communities with high rates of lead poisoning, where environmental strategies could be targeted. Because the epidemiology of lead poisoning continues to change, local and state health authorities must continuously update information on which to base decisions about screening