15 research outputs found

    Differential Sensitization of Muscle versus Fascia in Individuals with Low Back Pain

    No full text
    Muscles and the deep fascia surrounding them have been suggested to play an important role in various musculoskeletal pain conditions including low back pain. Both have been shown to host rich nociceptive innervation and to undergo changes in individuals with chronic pain. However, evidence for the respective contribution of muscle and fascia sensitization in humans with myofascial pain syndrome is lacking. Here, we studied the sensitization of muscle and fascia in individuals with myofascial low back pain. Twenty individuals with acute (5) and chronic (15) myofascial low back pain of the quadratus lumborum muscle and a matched control group of twenty healthy individuals were recruited and clinically evaluated. All participants underwent ultrasound-guided needling of their subcutaneous tissue, deep fascia and quadratus lumborum muscle. Reported pain intensity and episodes of muscle twitching were recorded and analyzed. Among pain patients, both muscles and deep fascia demonstrated pain hypersensitivity, but muscles were significantly more sensitized than the deep fascia. No difference between acute- or chronic-pain patients was observed. Results of this study suggest that while both deep fascia and muscle show pain sensitization in both early and chronic stages of low back pain, muscles are more sensitized than fascia

    Synaptic Size Dynamics as an Effectively Stochastic Process

    No full text
    <div><p>Long-term, repeated measurements of individual synaptic properties have revealed that synapses can undergo significant directed and spontaneous changes over time scales of minutes to weeks. These changes are presumably driven by a large number of activity-dependent and independent molecular processes, yet how these processes integrate to determine the totality of synaptic size remains unknown. Here we propose, as an alternative to detailed, mechanistic descriptions, a statistical approach to synaptic size dynamics. The basic premise of this approach is that the integrated outcome of the myriad of processes that drive synaptic size dynamics are effectively described as a combination of multiplicative and additive processes, both of which are stochastic and taken from distributions parametrically affected by physiological signals. We show that this seemingly simple model, known in probability theory as the Kesten process, can generate rich dynamics which are qualitatively similar to the dynamics of individual glutamatergic synapses recorded in long-term time-lapse experiments in <i>ex-vivo</i> cortical networks. Moreover, we show that this stochastic model, which is insensitive to many of its underlying details, quantitatively captures the distributions of synaptic sizes measured in these experiments, the long-term stability of such distributions and their scaling in response to pharmacological manipulations. Finally, we show that the average kinetics of new postsynaptic density formation measured in such experiments is also faithfully captured by the same model. The model thus provides a useful framework for characterizing synapse size dynamics at steady state, during initial formation of such steady states, and during their convergence to new steady states following perturbations. These findings show the strength of a simple low dimensional statistical model to quantitatively describe synapse size dynamics as the integrated result of many underlying complex processes.</p></div

    Estimating Kesten parameters in experimental data.

    No full text
    <p>An estimate of the parameter can be obtained from k-times iterated mappings of the data as explained in text. These mappings are shown for 1, 8, 24 and 48 time-steps, corresponding to 0.5, 4, 12 and 24 hours respectively (<b>A–D</b>); from each such mapping the slope of the linear regression (solid black line) is extracted. (<b>E</b>) The logarithmic values of these slopes (circles) plotted as a function of iteration number and fit by linear regression (solid black line) to obtain an estimate of . (<b>F</b>) The measured slopes (circles) with the predicted slope values (red line) over an extended time scale.</p

    nar

    No full text
    ne'erWe didn't take nar copper from him.YesDNE-cit WK 63Used I and SupUsed I and SupUsed

    Invariance of Kesten limiting distribution shape to different ε- and η- distributions.

    No full text
    <p>(<b>A</b>) Simulated limiting distributions of Kesten processes with the three different ε-distributions shown in inset, all belonging to the same μ-class 6, that is, 〈<i>ε</i><sup>6</sup>〉 = 1. The distribution of η was held fixed. The same three distributions after scaling are shown on the right. (<b>B</b>) Simulated limiting distributions of Kesten processes with the three different η-distributions shown in the inset. The distribution of <i>ε</i> was held fixed. The same three distributions after scaling are shown on the right.</p

    Distribution rescaling with individual rank-order shuffling in the Kesten process.

    No full text
    <p>The Kesten process provides a simple mechanism for population distribution rescaling without individual multiplication by a constant factor. Simulations were performed for 127 synapses (initial values taken from the synapses of <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003846#pcbi-1003846-g007" target="_blank">Fig. 7</a>). The synapses were first evolved for 24 hours (48 time points) with a Kesten process that preserved the original distribution. At this point was slightly increased (from 0.992 to 0.995), and the trajectories were evolved for another 24 hours with the new parameters. (<b>A</b>) Distributions before (blue) and after (red) changing . (<b>B</b>) Same distributions shown in (A) after scaling. (<b>C</b>) Changes in the fluorescence of individual synapses (<i>ΔF</i>) during the first 24 hours after changing (averages and standard deviations of binned data). The green line represents the expected relationships between <i>ΔF</i> and <i>F</i> had sizes of individual synapses scaled through multiplication by 1.14 (the ratio of mean synaptic size before and after changing . (<b>D</b>) Scaling without preserving rank order. Synapses were sorted according to their size before changing and plotted according to their original sizes (blue dots). The ‘sizes’ of the same synapses 24 hours after changing are shown as red dots. As in the experiments of <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003846#pcbi-1003846-g007" target="_blank">Figs. 7</a> and <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003846#pcbi-1003846-g008" target="_blank">8</a>, rank order is not preserved. The expected synaptic ‘sizes’, had scaling occurred multiplicatively, are shown as green dots.</p
    corecore