100 research outputs found

    Distribution and protein content differ between HIV-1 and HIV-1ΔNef viral particles produced in MOLT cells.

    No full text
    <p>HIV-1 and HIV-1<b>Δ</b>Nef virions were produced in MOLT cells and separated using a 30–70% continuous sucrose density gradient. Twelve fractions were collected from top to bottom and numbered #1 through #12 accordingly. The fractions were precipitated with 20% TCA and analyzed by WB. (A) Infectivity levels of the viral progeny produced in MOLT cells. (B) Lysates of HIV-1- and HIV-1<b>Δ</b>Nef-transfected cells, showing equivalent levels of viral protein expression. (C) Cell-free supernatants of HIV-1- and HIV-1<b>Δ</b>Nef-transfected cells, showing equivalent levels viral release. (D) CA content of cell-free supernatants before separation by the density gradient as measured using a p24-ELISA. (E) CA (top panel), IN (middle pannel) and MA (bottom pannel) protein content of mature particles. The top three panels represent the fractions for HIV-1, and the bottom three panels represent the fractions for HIV-1<b>Δ</b>Nef. (F) Quantification of the amount of CA in mature fractions after densitometry, *<i>p</i> = 0.002. (G) Quantification of the amount of MA in mature fractions after densitometry, **<i>p</i> = 0.059 (H) Quantification of the amount of IN in mature particles after densitometry. The results presented are representative of three experiments.</p

    HIV-1 Nef Inhibits Protease Activity and Its Absence Alters Protein Content of Mature Viral Particles

    No full text
    <div><p>Nef is an important player for viral infectivity and AIDS progression, but the mechanisms involved are not completely understood. It was previously demonstrated that Nef interacts with GagPol through p6*-Protease region. Because p6* and Protease are involved in processing, we explored the effect of Nef on viral Protease activity and virion assembly. Using in vitro assays, we observed that Nef is highly capable of inhibiting Protease activity. The IC50 for <i>nef</i>-deficient viruses in drug susceptibility assays were 1.7- to 3.5-fold higher than the wild-type counterpart varying with the type of the Protease inhibitor used. Indicating that, in the absence of Nef, Protease is less sensitive to Protease inhibitors. We compared the protein content between wild-type and <i>nef</i>-deficient mature viral particles by gradient sedimentation and observed up to 2.7-fold reduction in the Integrase levels in <i>nef</i>-deficient mature particles. This difference in levels of Integrase correlated with the difference in infectivity levels of wild type and <i>nef</i>-deficient viral progeny. In addition, an overall decrease in the production of mature particles was detected in <i>nef</i>-deficient viruses. Collectively, our data support the hypothesis that the decreased infectivity typical of <i>nef</i>-deficient viruses is due to an abnormal function of the viral Protease, which is in turn associated with less mature particles being produced and the loss of Integrase content in these particles, and these results may characterize Nef as a regulator of viral Protease activity.</p></div

    Comparison of the editing patterns and editing efficiencies of TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 when targeting the human CCR5 gene

    No full text
    <div><p>Abstract The human C-C chemokine receptor type-5 (CCR5) is the major transmembrane co-receptor that mediates HIV-1 entry into target CD4+ cells. Gene therapy to knock-out the CCR5 gene has shown encouraging results in providing a functional cure for HIV-1 infection. In gene therapy strategies, the initial region of the CCR5 gene is a hotspot for producing functional gene knock-out. Such target gene editing can be done using programmable endonucleases such as transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN) or clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR-Cas9). These two gene editing approaches are the most modern and effective tools for precise gene modification. However, little is known of potential differences in the efficiencies of TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 for editing the beginning of the CCR5 gene. To examine which of these two methods is best for gene therapy, we compared the patterns and amount of editing at the beginning of the CCR5 gene using TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 followed by DNA sequencing. This comparison revealed that CRISPR-Cas9 mediated the sorting of cells that contained 4.8 times more gene editing than TALEN+ transfected cells.</p></div

    HIV-1 and HIV-1ΔNef mature particles have different protein content and distribution on a density gradient.

    No full text
    <p>HIV-1 and HIV-1<b>Δ</b>Nef virions were produced in Hek-293T cells and separated using a 30–70% continuous sucrose density gradient. Ten fractions were collected from top to bottom and numbered #1 through #10 accordingly. The fractions were analyzed to determine the content and distribution of IN (top panel) and CA (lower panel). (A) Protein content of soluble proteins (fractions #1–4), immature particles (#5–7) and mature particles (#8–10) for the HIV-1 (left panels) and HIV-1<b>Δ</b>Nef viruses (right panels). (B) The CA content of cell-free supernatants before fractionation. (C) Quantification of the amount of CA in fractions #8–10. (D) Quantification of the amount of IN in fraction #8–10. *<i>p</i> = 0.061, **<i>p</i> = 0.036. The WB and ELISA results presented are representative of three experiments, CA and IN values are triplicates.</p

    CA, MA and IN levels differ between mature HIV-1 and HIV-1ΔNef viral particles produced in MOLT cells.

    No full text
    <p>HIV-1 and HIV-1<b>Δ</b>Nef virions were produced in MOLT cells and separated using a 9.6–18% continuous optiprep density gradient. Twelve fractions were collected from top to bottom and numbered #1 through #12 accordingly. The fractions were precipitated with 20% TCA and analyzed by WB to determine the contents and distributions of CA (top panel), MA (middle panel) and IN (bottom panels). Left panels represent the fractions for HIV-1, and the right panels represent the fractions for HIV-1<b>Δ</b>Nef. (A) The protein contents of the mature particles for the HIV-1 (left) and HIV-1<b>Δ</b>Nef viruses (right). (B) Numbers of blue-foci of non-fractionated supernatant (sn) and non-preciptated fractions for each virus. *Denotes the detection of a nonspecific band. The result presented is the mean of three experiments.</p

    Nef effects in PR activity <i>in vitro</i>.

    No full text
    <p>(A) SDS-PAGE of purified GST-Nef fusion (lane 1) and GST (lane 2) proteins stained with Coomassie Blue. Molecular weights (MW) are shown on the left. (B) WB of the lysate of <i>E. coli</i> expressing HIV-1 Protease (PR) (lane 1) and a lysate control (LC) (lane 2). *Denotes the detection of two nonspecific bands only in the LC. (C) Protease activity measured by the cleavage of a specific FRET substrate over a 2-hour interval. Substrate cleavage allows emission of light and is represented by the y-axis. All conditions were tested in triplicate. RLU – Relative light units.</p
    • …
    corecore