The future of long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine therapy: deeds and misconceptions

HIV infection is currently managed as a chronic disease because of improvements in antiretroviral therapy (ART). Switching to a new regimen is a natural event during long-term therapy to avoid problems related to toxicity, adherence, failure, and potential selection of drug resistance. The development of co-formulations of multiple agents in one pill, and novel drug classes and drugs with a high genetic barrier to resistance have been important in this context. The approval of the long-acting, once-monthly or bimonthly injectable combination of the second-generation strand transfer integrase inhibitor (InSTI), cabotegravir (CAB) together with the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), rilpivirine (RPV) represents the most recent achievement in the search for potent and convenient ART. Several pivotal trials (such as LATTE-2, ATLAS, FLAIR, and ATLAS-2M) showed the high efficacy and safety of this long-acting formulation used as an induction-maintenance strategy. Few confirmed virological failures (CVF) have been observed. The combination of at least two of the following baseline factors, HIV-1 subtype A6/A1, a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2, and RPV resistance-associated mutations, was associated with an increased risk of CVF at week 48. The data indicate that this long-acting therapeutic strategy is attractive and potent; therefore, defining the most appropriate patient for this treatment and how to handle practical issues is warranted

Does simplification to dolutegravir-based dual regimens impact on the CD4+/CD8+ T-cell ratio?

Abstract not availabl

Decay rate of antiS1/S2 IgG serum levels after 6 months of BNT162b2 vaccination in a cohort of COVID-19-naive and COVID-19-experienced subjects

Vaccination toward SARS-CoV-2 reduced mortality and ‘boosters’ are being implemented. We offer scientific contribution about IgG production in the COVID-19 experienced population. From January 2021 to March 2021, 183 residents and staff from the Elderly Nursing Home “San Giuseppe Moscati” who had received two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine were enrolled. The antibody response was assessed by the DiaSorin LIAISON-CLIA S1/S2® IgG solution. Cutoff levels for response (>39 BAU/mL) and neutralizing activity (>208 BAU/mL) were derived from DiaSorin official data. Serology was assessed before and after the first vaccination, and 2 weeks and 6 months after the second vaccination. Anti-S IgG in COVID-19 experienced, baseline IgG producers spiked after the first vaccination to median 5044 BAU/mL and decayed at 6 months to 2467.4 BAU/mL. Anti-S IgG in COVID-19 experienced, baseline IgG non-producers spiked after the second vaccination to median 1701.7 BAU/mL and decayed at 6 months to 904.8 BAU/mL. Anti-S IgG in COVID-19 naïve subjects spiked after the second vaccination to median 546 BAU/mL and decayed at 6 months to 319.8 BAU/mL. The differences between sequential timepoint levels in each group were statistically significant (p < .0001). Serology analysis revealed different kinetics between COVID-19 experienced subjects depending on baseline response, possibly predicting different IgG persistence in blood

Switch to dolutegravir plus Rilpivirine dual therapy in cART-Experienced subjects: An observational cohort

Introduction: Little information is available on the efficacy and safety of the dual combination of ripivirine plus dolutegravir. This work aims at beginning to fill this gap. Methods: All HIV-1 infected subjects treated with ripivirine plus dolutegravir between October 2014 and September 2015 in eight Italian centres were included in an observational cohort. Data were collected at baseline and at weeks 4, 12, 24 and 48. Results: One hundred and thirty-two subjects were followed for a median of 24 months, mean 33 months. One subject discontinued the study drug at week 24 for headache, one for drug interaction and one died after week 24 of illicit drug abuse. The mean age was 51.8, females 31.7% and non-caucasians 10%. Fifty-seven (43.2%) had at least one failure in their treatment history. Reasons for switching were simplification (53.0%), toxicity (34.8%), drug interactions (n = 7), persistent low-level viremia (n = 4), non-adherence (n = 3) and viral failure (n = 2). Sixty patients (45.5%) had reverse transcriptase (RT) mutations and 69 (44,7%) had protease (PR) mutations. Sixteen had baseline viral replication, 27 had > 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL and in 89 (67.4%) no virus was detected (NVD, 0 copies/mL). At w4, 114 (86.4%) had NVD, 15 had 1 to 49 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL and 3 had 50 to 57 copies/mL. At week 24 one subject had viral rebound without mutations due to missed drug refill, 19 had 1 to 49 copies/mL, and 112 had NVD. All 132 subjects were tested at weeks 4 and 24. Of the 50 subjects who had a 48-week follow-up, one had a treatment interruption, four had 1 to 49 copies/mL and 45 had NVD. Among the entire population, one subject had lowlevel, one intermediate and 4 high-level resistance to rilpivirine: none failed by week 48. Mean serum creatinine increased by +0.1 mg/dL. During the follow-up one patient reported headache and insomnia. Conclusions: Ripivirine plus dolutegravir proved safe and effective in this cohort of non-naive HIV-1 infected subjects

Virologic response in the global population (A) and in the subgroup that has reached week 48 (B).

<p>Proportion of viremia ranks over time, and median viral decay (range) and trend in viremic subjects.</p

Absolute CD4+ T-cell count (i) and proportion of CD4+ T-cells (ii) in the global population and in the subgroup that reached week 48, median (range).

<p>Absolute CD4+ T-cell count (i) and proportion of CD4+ T-cells (ii) in the global population and in the subgroup that reached week 48, median (range).</p