Engagement of patients with scleroderma to revise an internet self-management program

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) or scleroderma is a rare connective tissue disease. Many people do not have access to education programs. A self-management program was developed several years ago based on the literature and input from people with SSc. However, new therapies and treatment options have been developed since the program was developed. The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify and remedy gaps in an internet SSc self-management program to improve the quality of critical information relevant to effective management of the disease. Six focus groups with 30 participants with SSc were conducted: 2 telephone groups and 4 face-to-face groups. Prior to the focus group meetings, participants reviewed the existing website. A semi-structured interview guide elicited participants’ responses. Gaps were expressed in affect and positive affirmation; disease and symptom management; self-advocacy; information for caregivers, families, coworkers and strangers; tracking systems; information about local support groups; pictures and information on underrepresented groups; and general format. Discussants were positive regarding the audio voice over, exercise module, current content, health logs and checklists. People with SSc identified additional content to improve the internet self-management program. Many of the suggestions were incorporated into the existing program as modifications and additions to existing modules, patient testimonials, worksheets, resources sheets, and/or links to additional websites. People with rare, chronic conditions such as SSc need education and reliable sources of information and self-management skills. Experience Framework This article is associated with the Innovation & Technology lens of The Beryl Institute Experience Framework. (http://bit.ly/ExperienceFramework) Access other PXJ articles related to this lens. Access other resources related to this len

Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate an Internet‐Based Self‐Management Program in Systemic Sclerosis

Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/148240/1/acr23595.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/148240/2/acr23595_am.pd

How do patients define Raynaud’s phenomenon? Differences between primary and secondary disease

International audienceINTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: To examine how people define Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) based on their lived experiences and explore if differences exist depending on primary or secondary RP diagnosis. METHOD: An international survey was sent to people with RP through health systems, foundations, and social media. Qualitative coding of responses to an open text question regarding one’s own definition of RP was performed and themes were identified. The prevalence of themes among the sample and then comparisons between themes among people who self-reported primary versus secondary diagnosis of RP were performed. RESULTS: There were 1345 respondents from 45 countries (mean age 51.5 years, 93% female) who defined RP in their own words; 17% reported primary RP and 83% reported secondary RP (69% of secondary RP was scleroderma-related, n = 927). Over half defined their RP by describing the body parts affected, color changes, pain, and triggers or situations in which an episode occurs. Patients with primary RP more frequently defined RP in terms of its impact on function/quality of life and pain compared to those with secondary RP (34.5% versus 25.3%, respectively, p=0.004; 54.0% versus 46.8%, p=0.05). Patients with secondary RP more frequently included specific body parts, color change, the management of attacks, and other digital vascular complications in their definition of RP. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified differences in how people with primary and secondary RP define RP, in terms of how they feel and function. Our findings have implications for the domains of outcome measures for assessing RP within different patient populations. Key Points • Pain is more often mentioned in primary RP and color change in secondary RP. • Over 25% of patients included reduced the quality of life as part of their RP definition. • The concept of "attack" is used to define RP by only 2% of patients

Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate an Internet-Based Self-Management Program in Systemic Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE:In a pilot study, our group showed that an internet-based self-management program improves self-efficacy in systemic sclerosis (SSc). The objective of the current study was to compare an internet-based self-management program to a patient-focused educational book developed to assess measures of self-efficacy and other patient-reported outcomes in patients with SSc. METHODS:We conducted a 16-week randomized, controlled trial. RESULTS:Of the 267 participants who completed baseline questionnaires and were randomized to the intervention (internet: www.selfmanagescleroderma.com) or control (book) group, 123 participants (93%) in the internet group and 124 participants (94%) in the control group completed the 16-week randomized controlled trial (RCT). The mean ± SD age of all participants was 53.7 ± 11.7 years, 91% were women, and 79.4% had some college or a higher degree. The mean ± SD disease duration after diagnosis of SSc was 8.97 ± 8.50 years. There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups for the primary outcome measure (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Self-Efficacy for Managing Symptoms: mean change of 0.35 in the internet group versus 0.94 in the control group; P = 0.47) and secondary outcome measures, except the EuroQol 5-domain instrument visual analog scale score (P = 0.05). Internet group participants agreed that the self-management modules were of importance to them, the information was presented clearly, and the website was easy to use and at an appropriate reading level. CONCLUSION:Our RCT showed that the internet-based self-management website was not statistically superior to an educational patient-focused book in improving self-efficacy and other measures. The participants were enthusiastic about the content and presentation of the self-management website