Temporal and Cartographic Analyses of the Distribution within Spain of Mortality Due to Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (1984⁻2016)

The aim is to conduct a descriptive, population-based study in order to assess temporal and spatial changes in mortality due to granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) in Spain from 1984 to 2016. Mortality data were obtained from the Spanish Annual Death Registry. Deaths in which GPA was the underlying cause were selected using the 446.4 and M31.3 codes from the International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th revision. Annual average age at death and age-adjusted mortality rates were calculated. Geographic analysis was performed at municipality and district level. Variations in mortality according to the type of municipality (urban, agro-urban or rural), district and geographic location (degrees of latitude) were assessed using standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and smoothed-SMRs. Over the whole period, 620 deaths due to GPA were identified. Age at death increased at an average annual rate of 0.78% over the period 1987-2016 (p < 0.05). Age-adjusted mortality rates increased by an annual average of 20.58% from 1984 to 1992, after which they fell by 1.91% a year (p < 0.05). The agro-urban category had the highest percentage (4.57%) of municipalities with a significantly higher GPA mortality rate than expected. Geographic analysis revealed four districts with a higher risk of death due to GPA, two in the North of Spain and two in the South. This population-based study revealed an increase in the age at death attributed to GPA. Age-adjusted mortality rates went up sharply until 1992, after which they started to decline until the end of the study period. Geographic differences in mortality risk were identified but further studies will be necessary to ascertain the reasons for the distribution of GPA disease.This research was supported by the Spanish Stategy Action for Health (AESI), project no. TPY1238/15. GS enjoys a research grant funded by the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport (No. FPU14/03914).S

El retraso en el diagnóstico de las enfermedades raras y sus consecuencias

Artículo de divulgación publicado en The Conversation España, el 16/03/2023.El diagnóstico de las enfermedades raras es tan complejo que lo habitual es que se prolongue en el tiempo. Las consecuencias de ese retraso las sufren los pacientes, que tardan años, o incluso décadas, en poder ponerle nombre a su enfermedad. Hablamos de retraso diagnóstico cuando se tarda más de un año en ser diagnosticado de una enfermedad rara conocida. Pese a que es un problema de primer nivel reivindicado por las asociaciones de pacientes y los organismos internacionales, apenas hay datos sobre cuál es la situación.N

Familial Mediterranean Fever in Spain: Time Trend and Spatial Distribution of the Hospitalizations

Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is a rare, hereditary, auto-inflammatory disease. The aims of this study were to explore the time trend and geographical distribution of hospitalizations in Spain from 2008 to 2015. We identified hospitalizations of FMF from the Spanish Minimum Basic Data Set at hospital discharge, using ICD-9-CM code 277.31. Age-specific and age-adjusted hospitalization rates were calculated. The time trend and the average percentage change were analyzed using Joinpoint regression. Standardized morbidity ratios were calculated and mapped by province. A total of 960 FMF-related hospitalizations (52% men) were identified across the period 2008-2015, with an increase in hospitalizations of 4.9% per year being detected (p 1) in 13 provinces (5 in the Mediterranean area), and lower (SMR < 1) in 14 provinces (3 in the Mediterranean area). There was an increase in hospitalizations of patients with FMF in Spain throughout the study period, with a risk of hospitalization that was higher, though not exclusively so, in provinces along the Mediterranean coast. These findings contribute to the visibility of FMF and provide useful information for health planning. Further research should take into account new population-based information, in order to continue monitoring this disease.S

Diagnostic delay in rare diseases: systematic review

[ES] Fundamentos: Según el Consorcio Internacional para la Investigación de Enfermedades Raras (IRDiRC) el diagnóstico de una enfermedad rara (ER) conocida debería hacerse en el plazo de un año. El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática fue identificar las evidencias científicas sobre el tiempo que transcurre hasta obtener el diagnóstico en pacientes con ER y conocer si se produce retraso, conforme al objetivo del IRDiRC (más de un año). Métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática según criterios PRISMA en las bases de datos PubMed, Scopus y Web of Science (WoS). Se valoró la calidad de los estudios incluidos conforme a la declaración STROBE. Resultados: Se incluyeron 17 artículos orientados a ER específicas, principalmente metabólicas, neurológicas y trastornos que afectan a la inmunidad. Los diseños fueron fundamentalmente transversales, aunque también se incluyeron dos de cohorte retrospectivos. La mayoría de los estudios reflejan que se emplea más de un año en obtener el diagnóstico de estas ER. Conclusiones: La literatura científica que cuantifica el tiempo hasta el diagnóstico en ER es aún escasa y ningún estudio se orienta a estas enfermedades en su conjunto. Según el objetivo del IRDiRC, existe un evidente retraso en el diagnóstico de ER, ya que en la mayoría de los casos se requiere de un tiempo superior a un año. Por tanto, son necesarios nuevos avances en campo de las ER para contribuir a la reducción del tiempo desde la aparición de los síntomas hasta el diagnóstico adecuado [EN] Background: The aims of the International Consortium for Rare Diseases Research (IRDiRC) include that the diagnosis of a known rare disease (RD) must be made within a year. The objective of this systematic review was to identify the scientific evidence about the time to diagnosis in patients affected by RDs and also to know if there is a diagnostic delay (more than one year) according to the objective set by the IRDiRC. Methods: A systematic review was carried out according to PRISMA criteria in the PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases. The quality of the articles was assessed using the STROBE statement. Results: 17 articles were included. They were devoted to specific RDs, most of them metabolic diseases, neurological and disorders that affect immunity. The study designs were mainly cross-sectional, and two retrospective cohorts were also included. Most articles showed that it takes more than a year to get a diagnosis for these RDs. Conclusions: Scientific literature quantifying the time to diagnosis is still scarce and no study addresses RDs as a whole. In most cases, it takes more than one year to obtain a diagnosis of a RD, so there is an obvious delay according to the objective set by the IRDiRC. Therefore, new advances in the RD field are necessary to reduce the time from the onset of symptoms to the accurate diagnosis.S

A population-based study of mortality due to muscular dystrophies across a 36-year period in Spain

Muscular dystrophies (MD) are a group of rare hereditary degenerative diseases. Our aim was to analyze the mortality pattern in Spain from 1981 to 2016 to assess the temporal trend and discern possible geographic differences using population-based data. Annual deaths related to MD were obtained from the National Statistics Institute with codes 359.1 of the ICD-9 (1981-1998) and G71.0 of the ICD-10 (1999-2016). Age-adjusted mortality rates were calculated and changes in mortality trends were identified. The standardized mortality ratios (SMR) and their respective 95% confidence intervals were calculated by district for 1999-2016. Smoothed SMRs and posterior probability were also assessed and then mapped to look for patterns or geographic distribution. All rates were expressed per 1,000,000 inhabitants. A total of 2,512 deaths (73.8% men) were identified. The age-adjusted mortality rates varied from 0.63 (95% CI 0.40-0.95) in 1981 to 1.51 (95% CI 1.17-1.93) in 2016. MD mortality showed a significant increase of 8.81% per year (95% CI 5.0-12.7) from 1981 to 1990, remaining stable afterwards. Areas with risk of death higher than expected for Spain as a whole were identified, not showing a specific regional pattern. In conclusion, the rising trend in MD mortality might be attributable to advanced improvements in diagnostic techniques leading to a rise in prevalence. Further research on the districts with the highest mortality would be necessary.This research was funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spanish Strategy Action for Health (AESI), project PI14CIII/00067, TPY 1238/15.S

Diagnostic Process in Rare Diseases: Determinants Associated with Diagnostic Delay

Many people living with rare disease (RD) report a difficult diagnostic process from the symptom onset until they obtain the definitive diagnosis. The aim of this study was thus to ascertain the diagnostic process in RDs, and explore the determinants related with having to wait for more than one year in this process (defined as “diagnostic delay”). We conducted a case–control study, using a purpose-designed form from the Spanish Rare Diseases Patient Registry for data-collection purposes. A descriptive analysis was performed and multivariate backward logistic regression models fitted. Based on data on 1216 patients living with RDs, we identified a series of determinants associated with experiencing diagnostic delay. These included: having to travel to see a specialist other than that usually consulted in the patient’s home province (OR 2.1; 95%CI 1.6–2.9); visiting more than 10 specialists (OR 2.6; 95%CI 1.7–4.0); being diagnosed in a region other than that of the patient’s residence at the date of symptom onset (OR 2.3; 95%CI 1.5–3.6); suffering from a RD of the nervous system (OR 1.4; 95%CI 1.0–1.8). In terms of time taken to see a specialist, waiting more than 6 months to be referred from the first medical visit was the period of time which most contributed to diagnostic delay (PAR 30.2%). In conclusion, this is the first paper to use a collaborative study based on a nationwide registry to address the diagnostic process of patients living with RDs. While the evidence shows that the diagnostic process experienced by these persons is complex, more studies are needed to determine the implications that this has for their lives and those of their families at a social, educational, occupational, psychological, and financial level.This research was supported by the Spanish State Research Agency, State R&D Program Oriented to the Challenges of the Society, project no. RTI2018-094035-A-I00. J.B-L enjoys a Grant PRE2019-091508 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 by “ESF Investing in your future”.S

Wilson's disease in Spain: validation of sources of information used by the Rare Diseases Registries

[ES] Objetivo: Evaluar las fuentes de información empleadas por los Registros Autonómicos de Enfermedades Raras (RAER) para la captación de la enfermedad de Wilson en España, calcular su prevalencia y mortalidad, y describir las características sociodemográficas de las personas afectadas. Método: Estudio epidemiológico transversal, periodo 2010-2015. Se captaron los posibles casos mediante los códigos 275.1 (CIE-9-MC), E83.0 (CIE-10) y 905 ORPHA en 15 RAER y el Registro de Pacientes de Enfermedades Raras del Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Los diagnósticos fueron validados revisando la documentación clínica. Se calcularon el valor predictivo positivo (VPP) de las fuentes de información, la prevalencia, la mortalidad y la distribución de las características sociodemográficas. Resultados: El Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos (CMBD) fue la fuente de información más utilizada por los RAER (VPP = 39,4%), seguida del Registro de Medicamentos Huérfanos (RMH) (VPP = 81,9%). La Historia Clínica de Atención Primaria (HCAP) obtuvo un VPP del 55,9%. Las combinaciones con mayor VPP fueron las del RMH con el CMBD (VPP = 95,8%) y del RMH con la HCAP (VPP = 92,9%). Se confirmaron 514 casos, el 57,2% eran hombres, cuya edad mediana de diagnóstico fue de 21,3 años. La prevalencia fue de 1,64/100.000 habitantes en 2015 y la mortalidad del 3,0%, siendo ambas superiores en los hombres. Conclusión: Se recomienda la incorporación en los RAER del RMH y de la HCAP, ya que su combinación y la del RMH con el CMBD podrían utilizarse como criterio de validación automática para la enfermedad de Wilson. La prevalencia obtenida fue similar a la de otros países próximos a España. [EN] Objective: To evaluate the sources of information used by the Regional Population-based Registries of Rare Diseases (RRD) for Wilson's Disease identification in Spain; to calculate its prevalence and mortality; and to describe the sociodemographic characteristics of those affected. Method: Cross-sectional epidemiological study, period 2010-2015. Possible cases were identified by codes 275.1 (ICD-9-CM), E83.0 (ICD-10) and 905 (ORPHAcode) in: 15 participating RRD and the Rare Disease Patients Registry of the Carlos III Health Institute. The diagnoses were confirmed through a clinical documentation review. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the sources of information used by RRD and their combinations were obtained. The prevalence, mortality and the distribution of sociodemographic characteristics were calculated. Results: The Hospital Discharge Database (HDD) was the most used source by the RRD (PPV=39.4%), followed by the Orphan Drugs Registry (ODR) (PPV=81.9%). The Clinical History of Primary Care (PC) obtains PPV=55.9%. The combinations with highest PPV were the ODR with HDD (PPV=95.8%) and the ODR with PC (PPV=92.9%). 514 cases were confirmed, 57.2% men, with a median age of diagnosis of 21.3 years. The prevalence was 1.64/100,000 inhabitants in 2015 and mortality rate was 3.0%, being both higher in men. Conclusions: Incorporation of ODR and PC into the RRD is recommended, as its combination and ODR with HDD could be used as an automatic validation criterion for Wilson's disease. The prevalence obtained was similar to that of countries close to Spain.Este proyecto ha sido posible gracias a los fondos recibidos por la Fundació Per Amor a l’Art (Convenio CPRESC00043).S

Wilson's disease in Spain: validation of sources of information used by the Rare Diseases Registries

[ES] Objetivo: Evaluar las fuentes de información empleadas por los Registros Autonómicos de Enfermedades Raras (RAER) para la captación de la enfermedad de Wilson en España, calcular su prevalencia y mortalidad, y describir las características sociodemográficas de las personas afectadas. Método: Estudio epidemiológico transversal, periodo 2010-2015. Se captaron los posibles casos mediante los códigos 275.1 (CIE-9-MC), E83.0 (CIE-10) y 905 ORPHA en 15 RAER y el Registro de Pacientes de Enfermedades Raras del Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Los diagnósticos fueron validados revisando la documentación clínica. Se calcularon el valor predictivo positivo (VPP) de las fuentes de información, la prevalencia, la mortalidad y la distribución de las características sociodemográficas. Resultados: El Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos (CMBD) fue la fuente de información más utilizada por los RAER (VPP = 39,4%), seguida del Registro de Medicamentos Huérfanos (RMH) (VPP = 81,9%). La Historia Clínica de Atención Primaria (HCAP) obtuvo un VPP del 55,9%. Las combinaciones con mayor VPP fueron las del RMH con el CMBD (VPP = 95,8%) y del RMH con la HCAP (VPP = 92,9%). Se confirmaron 514 casos, el 57,2% eran hombres, cuya edad mediana de diagnóstico fue de 21,3 años. La prevalencia fue de 1,64/100.000 habitantes en 2015 y la mortalidad del 3,0%, siendo ambas superiores en los hombres. Conclusión: Se recomienda la incorporación en los RAER del RMH y de la HCAP, ya que su combinación y la del RMH con el CMBD podrían utilizarse como criterio de validación automática para la enfermedad de Wilson. La prevalencia obtenida fue similar a la de otros países próximos a España. [EN] Objective: To evaluate the sources of information used by the Regional Population-based Registries of Rare Diseases (RRD) for Wilson's Disease identification in Spain; to calculate its prevalence and mortality; and to describe the sociodemographic characteristics of those affected. Method: Cross-sectional epidemiological study, period 2010-2015. Possible cases were identified by codes 275.1 (ICD-9-CM), E83.0 (ICD-10) and 905 (ORPHAcode) in: 15 participating RRD and the Rare Disease Patients Registry of the Carlos III Health Institute. The diagnoses were confirmed through a clinical documentation review. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the sources of information used by RRD and their combinations were obtained. The prevalence, mortality and the distribution of sociodemographic characteristics were calculated. Results: The Hospital Discharge Database (HDD) was the most used source by the RRD (PPV=39.4%), followed by the Orphan Drugs Registry (ODR) (PPV=81.9%). The Clinical History of Primary Care (PC) obtains PPV=55.9%. The combinations with highest PPV were the ODR with HDD (PPV=95.8%) and the ODR with PC (PPV=92.9%). 514 cases were confirmed, 57.2% men, with a median age of diagnosis of 21.3 years. The prevalence was 1.64/100,000 inhabitants in 2015 and mortality rate was 3.0%, being both higher in men. Conclusions: Incorporation of ODR and PC into the RRD is recommended, as its combination and ODR with HDD could be used as an automatic validation criterion for Wilson's disease. The prevalence obtained was similar to that of countries close to Spain.Este proyecto ha sido posible gracias a los fondos recibidos por la Fundació Per Amor a l’Art (Convenio CPRESC00043).S

RARE-Bestpractices: a platform for sharing best practices for the management of rare diseases

No abstract available

RARE-Bestpractices: a platform for sharing best practices for the management of rare diseases

From 7th European Conference on Rare Diseases and Orphan Products (ECRD 2014).Rare diseases; clinical practice guidelines; recommendations. RARE-Bestpractices (http://www.rarebestpractices.eu) is a 4-year project (2013-2016) funded by the EC FP7. The project aims at improving clinical management of patients with rare diseases (RD) and at narrowing the existing gap in quality of healthcare among countries. Methods: RARE-Bestpractices (http://www.rarebestpractices.eu) involves 9 EU countries, including 15 partners from academic institutions, governmental bodies, patient organizations and networks, which will exploit the added value of integrating different contributions and viewpoints. The platform is developed involving both experts in RD research as well as experts in clinical practice guidelines (CPG) and systematic reviews. Results: Project expected outputs include: 1) identification of challenges to be considered in deriving high quality standards for CPG on RD; 2) transparent procedures and criteria for the evaluation of CPG and their collection in a publicly searchable database; 3) identification of notation criteria to improve user understandability and implementation of CPG; 4) production of mechanisms to assess RD clinical research needs; 5) development of training activities targeted to key stakeholders to disseminate process and tools for developing and evaluating CPG; 6) the publication of a new scientific journal (http://rarejournal.org). Discussion: RARE-Bestpractices addresses the demands from both patients and health care providers for updated and high quality CPG on RD. The project will meet the requirements laid down by to the Directive 2011/24/EU, which endorses EU MS to develop European Reference Networks (ERNs) for RD; in fact, one main criterion for ERNs should be the competence to produce CPG and actively disseminate them among Centers of Expertise.N