Role of Radiosurgery/Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Oligometastatic Disease: Brain Oligometastases

During the natural history of oncologic diseases, approximately 20–40% of patients affected by cancer will develop brain metastases. Non-small lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma are the primaries that are most likely to metastasize into the brain. To date, the role of Radiosurgery/Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) without Whole brain irradiation (WBRT) is a well-recognized treatment option for patients with limited intracranial disease (1–4 BMs) and a life-expectancy of more than 3–6 months. In the current review, we focused on randomized studies that evaluate the potential benefit of radiosurgery/stereotactic radiotherapy for brain oligometastases. To date, no difference in overall survival has been observed between SRS/SRT alone compared to WBRT plus SRS. Notably, SRS alone achieved higher local control rates compared to WBRT. A possible strength of SRS adoption is the potential decreased neurocognitive impairment

Role of Radiosurgery/Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Oligometastatic Disease: Brain Oligometastases

During the natural history of oncologic diseases, approximately 20-40% of patients affected by cancer will develop brain metastases. Non-small lung cancer;breast cancer, and melanoma are the primaries that are most likely to metastasize into the brain. To date, the role of Radiosurgery/Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) without Whole brain irradiation (WBRT) is a well-recognized treatment option for patients with limited intracranial disease (1-4 BMs) and a life-expectancy of more than 3-6 months. In the current review, we focused on randomized studies that evaluate the potential benefit of radiosurgery/stereotactic radiotherapy for brain oligometastases. To date, no difference in overall survival has been observed between SRS/SRT alone compared to WBRT plus SRS. Notably, SRS alone achieved higher local control rates compared to WBRT. A possible strength of SRS adoption is the potential decreased neurocognitive impairment

Weekly Cisplatin and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Radical Treatment of Advanced Cervical Cancer in Elderly Patients: Feasibility and Clinical Preliminary Results

Background: To evaluate the feasibility and clinical preliminary results of weekly cisplatin and volumetric-modulated arc therapy to the pelvis with simultaneous integrated boost to macroscopic disease in a cohort of elderly patients. Materials and Methods: Inclusion criteria of this prospective study were age ≥70 years, Karnofsky performance status 70 to 100, locally advanced histologically proven squamous cervical carcinoma, and patients unable to undergo brachytherapy. Radiation doses prescribed were 66 Gy to the macroscopic disease and 54 Gy to the pelvic nodes in 30 fractions. Weekly cisplatin dose was 40 mg/mq. Results: A total of 30 patients were recruited. Median follow-up was 32 months (range: 8-48 months). Median age was 72 years (range: 70-84 years). The 3-year overall survival and local control were 93% and 80%, respectively. The median time to progression was 24 months (range: 6-30 months). Analyzing clinical outcome grouping based on the stage of disease, II versus III, the 3-year overall survival was 100% and 85%, respectively. The 3-year local control was 91% for stage II and 67% for stage III. Acute and late toxicities were acceptable without severe events. Conclusion: Weekly cisplatin and volumetric-modulated arc therapy–simultaneous integrated boost for radical treatment of advanced cervical cancer in the current cohort of elderly patients were feasible. Long-term results and prospective randomized trials are advocated. </jats:sec

Initial experience of hypofractionated radiation retreatment with true beam and flattening filter free beam in selected case reports of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

AimTo show our preliminary experience in using TrueBeam with RapidArc technology and FFF beam for stereotactic re-irradiation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.BackgroundThanks to new advanced techniques, as well as intensity modulated radiation therapy, it is possible to approach head and neck recurrences in selected patients. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) in its RapidArc® format, permits to reduce significantly the time to deliver complex intensity modulated plans, allowing to treat hypofractionated regimes within a few minutes. With TrueBeam it is possible to perform photon beams without usage of the flattening filter. It seems possible to expect a reduction of out-of-field dose when flattening filter free (FFF) beams are used. While research into the physics domain for FFF beams is increasing, there are very few clinical data where FFF beams are applied in clinical practice.Materials and methodsWe present here the cases of 4 patients with local or regional recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. All patients were treated using TrueBeam with RapidArc technology and FFF beam for stereotactic hypofractionated re-irradiation.ResultsAll patients concluded SBRT and showed good tolerability. During follow-up, complete response at imaging evaluation (PET and/or MRI) for all treated patients was documented.ConclusionsOur preliminary experience using TrueBeam with RapidArc technology and FFF beam for stereotactic hypofractionated re-irradiation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma was safe and effective in all 4 treated patients. Longer follow-up and a larger population of study is needed to confirm these promising results

Early clinical experience with volumetric modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer patients

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To report about early clinical experience in radiation treatment of head and neck cancer of different sites and histology by volumetric modulated arcs with the RapidArc technology.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>During 2009, 45 patients were treated at Istituto Clinico Humanitas with RapidArc (28 males and 17 females, median age 65 years). Of these, 78% received concomitant chemotherapy. Thirty-six patients were treated as exclusive curative intent (group A), three as postoperative curative intent (group B) and six with sinonasal tumours (group C). Dose prescription was at Planning Target Volumes (PTV) with simultaneous integrated boost: 54.45Gy and 69.96Gy in 33 fractions (group A); 54.45Gy and 66Gy in 33 fractions (group B) and 55Gy in 25 fractions (group C).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Concerning planning optimization strategies and constraints, as per PTV coverage, for all groups, D_98%> 95% and V_95%> 99%. As regards organs at risk, all planning objectives were respected, and this was correlated with observed acute toxicity rates. Only 28% of patients experienced G3 mucositis, 14% G3 dermitis 44% had G2 dysphagia. Nobody required feeding tubes to be placed during treatment. Acute toxicity is also related to chemotherapy. Two patients interrupted the course of radiotherapy because of a quick worsening of general clinical condition.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These preliminary results stated that volumetric modulated arc therapy in locally advanced head and neck cancers is feasible and effective, with acceptable toxicities.</p

Large volume unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: acute toxicity and initial outcome results with rapid arc

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To report acute toxicity, initial outcome results and planning therapeutic parameters in radiation treatment of advanced lung cancer (stage III) with volumetric modulated arcs using RapidArc (RA).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Twenty-four consecutive patients were treated with RA. All showed locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer with stage IIIA-IIIB and with large volumes (GTV:299 ± 175 cm³, PTV:818 ± 206 cm³). Dose prescription was 66Gy in 33 fractions to mean PTV. Delivery was performed with two partial arcs with a 6 MV photon beam.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>From a dosimetric point of view, RA allowed us to respect most planning objectives on target volumes and organs at risk. In particular: for GTV D_1%= 105.6 ± 1.7%, D_99%= 96.7 ± 1.8%, D_5%-D_95%= 6.3 ± 1.4%; contra-lateral lung mean dose resulted in 13.7 ± 3.9Gy, for spinal cord D_1%= 39.5 ± 4.0Gy, for heart V_45Gy= 9.0 ± 7.0Gy, for esophagus D_1%= 67.4 ± 2.2Gy. Delivery time was 133 ± 7s. At three months partial remission > 50% was observed in 56% of patients. Acute toxicities at 3 months showed 91% with grade 1 and 9% with grade 2 esophageal toxicity; 18% presented grade 1 and 9% with grade 2 pneumonia; no grade 3 acute toxicity was observed. The short follow-up does not allow assessment of local control and progression free survival.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>RA proved to be a safe and advantageous treatment modality for NSCLC with large volumes. Long term observation of patients is needed to assess outcome and late toxicity.</p

Initial Experience With Single-Isocenter Radiosurgery to Target Multiple Brain Metastases Using an Automated Treatment Planning Software: Clinical Outcomes and Optimal Target Volume Margins Strategy

n/

Activity of sotorasib against brain metastases from NSCLC harboring KRAS p.G12C mutation: a case report

In the CodeBreaK 100 phase 2 study, sotorasib was active for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) p.G12C mutation. However, patients with untreated and/or active brain metastases were excluded from the trial, and the activity of sotorasib in the setting of brain metastases should be further investigated. Here we report the case of a KRAS p.G12C mutant NSCLC patient with three brain metastases, of whom one was untreated and the other two had progressed after radiotherapy with symptoms requiring steroids, that responded to sotorasib. Our report suggests that sotorasib may be active against untreated or progressive brain metastases, supporting further evaluation of sotorasib in this setting