3 research outputs found
Stochastic Gravitational Wave Measurements with Bar Detectors: Dependence of Response on Detector Orientation
The response of a cross-correlation measurement to an isotropic stochastic
gravitational-wave background depends on the observing geometry via the overlap
reduction function. If one of the detectors being correlated is a resonant bar
whose orientation can be changed, the response to stochastic gravitational
waves can be modulated. I derive the general form of this modulation as a
function of azimuth, both in the zero-frequency limit and at arbitrary
frequencies. Comparisons are made between pairs of nearby detectors, such as
LIGO Livingston-ALLEGRO, Virgo-AURIGA, Virgo-NAUTILUS, and EXPLORER-AURIGA,
with which stochastic cross-correlation measurements are currently being
performed, planned, or considered.Comment: 17 pages, REVTeX (uses rcs, amsmath, hyperref, and graphicx style
files), 4 figures (8 eps image files
First upper limit analysis and results from LIGO science data: stochastic background
I describe analysis of correlations in the outputs of the three LIGO
interferometers from LIGO's first science run, held over 17 days in August and
September of 2002, and the resulting upper limit set on a stochastic background
of gravitational waves. By searching for cross-correlations between the LIGO
detectors in Livingston, LA and Hanford, WA, we are able to set a 90%
confidence level upper limit of h_{100}^2 Omega_0 < 23 +/- 4.6.Comment: 7 pages; 1 eps figures; proceeding from 2003 Edoardo Amaldi Meeting
on Gravitational Wave
A data analysis technique for the LIGO-ALLEGRO stochastic background search
We describe the cross-correlation measurements being carried out on data from the LIGO Livingston Observatory and the ALLEGRO resonant bar detector. The LIGO data are sampled at 16 384 Hz while the ALLEGRO data are base-banded, i.e., heterodyned at 899 Hz and then sampled at 250 Hz. We handle these different sampling parameters by working in the Fourier domain, and demonstrate the approximate equivalence of this measurement to a hypothetical time-domain method in which both data streams are upsampled