Kontrol Diri Dan Kecemasan Komunikasi Interpersonal Pada Pramuwisata

This study aim to analysis relationship of self-control and anxiety of interpersonal communicationin a tourist guide. Product moment corelation analysis (rxy) yields for 0905, to provethe relationship between self-control and interpersonal communication anxiety in a tourist guide.These results indicate a negative relationship between the variables X (Self Control) and variableY (Interpersonal Communication Anxiety in the guides). Social Learning Theory became atheories used in this study, where most of the individual behavior acquired partly the result oflearning through observation of behavior displayed other individuals whose became the model.Elaboration Likelihood Theory which states that each individual will interpret the message orinformation they receive, in accordance with the information they have and their beliefs aboutsomething related to the message. Self-control on the tour guides in Yogyakarta based on thefive major aspects of self-control, that has a very high level of measurement. Includes the abilityto anticipate events, the ability to interpret events and the ability to take decisions. Meanwhile,two other aspects of self control shows the results of measurements at very low category, whichconsists of aspects of behavior and stimulus control. While anxiety based on the three aspects ofinterpersonal communication, which consists of inhibition of the ability to express themselves,lack of interest in communicating and social interaction is interrupted, it indicates the levelmeasurement at very low category. Thus, interpersonal communication anxiety on tour guidesin Yogyakarta can be said to be very low

Mobile and Static enrichment devices.

<p>a) Mobile ball and rope enrichment device: fish are placed into the ball, which must then be manipulated by the seal in order to knock out the hidden prey items. b) Static box enrichment device: fish are hidden in the recessed tubes on the front surface of the device. Because the box device is static against the wall it cannot be manipulated to knock out prey items. See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0124615#pone.0124615.s005" target="_blank">S1 Video</a> for footage of the main behaviours used by the seals when interacting with these devices.</p

Suplementary information

Files as described in main text in the publicatio

Summary of the experimental design used and total time of observation.

<p>Summary of the experimental design used and total time of observation.</p

Ethogram and operational definitions for Australian fur seal behaviour during the experimental sessions carried out in this study.

<p>Behaviours recorded include all major behavioural states observed during these trials, but do not constitute a complete list of behaviours displayed by Australian fur seals in captivity. See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0124615#pone.0124615.s005" target="_blank">S1 Video</a> for footage of some of these behaviour states.</p><p>Ethogram and operational definitions for Australian fur seal behaviour during the experimental sessions carried out in this study.</p

Summary of behaviours displayed during feeding trials.

<p>Mean duration (min) of behaviour states performed by Bay (a) and Tarwin (b) during each control and enrichment treatment. Similar behaviour states are grouped to show time spent performing: enrichment-related behaviours, pattern swimming, random swimming or any other behaviour state. Operational definitions for behaviour states are outlined in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0124615#pone.0124615.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>.</p

Park et al Low frequency hearing preceded the evolution of giant body size and filter feeding in baleen whales_ESM

ESM for Park et al toothed mysticete cochlea pape

Suction used to draw a prey item into the oral cavity filmed at 50 frames/second.

<p>a) prey item held loosely between the lips, b) prey item sucked into the oral cavity as the jaws opened to maximum gape, the arrow indicates the direction of prey movement towards the mouth, c) mouth closes and water is expelled via the lateral sides of the mouth, although this is difficult to see in cloudy water. Prey capture event performed by Bay (ARKS# A70598), a female Australian fur seal (<i>Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus</i>). Time displayed as hours:minutes:seconds:frames. For the footage see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0112521#pone.0112521.s001" target="_blank">Video S1</a>.</p

Object manipulation and suction used to draw prey from the mobile ball device filmed at 25 frames/second.

<p>a) ball was carefully manipulated using the muzzle, while looking through the hole in its side for concealed prey, b) when a prey item is seen near the opening the seal moved its mouth over the hole before pushing the ball forward, while also generating suction to draw out the prey item, c) water expulsion visible as it is expelled via the sides of the mouth following suction (arrows indicate cloud of turbid water being expelled), d) once protruding from the hole the prey item was gripped using the anterior teeth before being pulled out and consumed. Prey capture event performed by Bay (ARKS# A70598), a female Australian fur seal (<i>Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus</i>). Time displayed as hours:minutes:seconds:frames. For the footage see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0112521#pone.0112521.s001" target="_blank">Video S1</a>.</p

Summary of kinematic variables.

<p>Values are means ± s.e.m.</p><p>Summary of kinematic variables.</p