4 research outputs found

    Cognitive Dysfunction and Affective Mood Disorder Screening in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Protocol for a Prospective Case-Control Study

    No full text
    BackgroundMild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) might be more frequent in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but the relationship between these 2 entities is yet to be entirely established. Certain blood biomarkers (eg, serum amyloid A [SAA] and serum homocysteine [Hcy], which increase in IBD and MCI; brain-derived neurotrophic factor [BDNF], which decreases in MCI and AD but is not clearly modified in IBD; and S100 calcium-binding protein B [S100B], which increases in the blood-brain barrier and neuronal lesions) might predict the stage of MCI or dementia or progression to a further state. The gut–brain axis (GBA) might be the key to the development of MCI in patients with IBD, along with systemic inflammation and the possible and unknown adverse effects of disease-modifying medication. ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to investigate whether GBA interactions play a role in MCI development in patients with IBD. MethodsA case-control study will be conducted on at least 100 patients diagnosed with IBD, matched with 100 healthy individual controls. The matching will include sex, age, and education. Patients will be fully examined, and a full interview and a neurological and cognitive examination will be performed. The primary clinical outcomes will be cognitive test scores (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Trail Making Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, forward and backward digit span testing). Depression, stress, and anxiety screening will also be performed. Blood samples from all participants will be collected, and aliquots will be immediately stored in a biobank. Primary laboratory outcomes will include serum levels of presumed cognitive dysfunction blood biomarkers SAA, Hcy, S100B, and BDNF. Follow-up will be performed at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months. ResultsData collection started in December 2021 and is ongoing. So far, 53 patients with IBD have been recruited and 50 HC matched. Data collection should end in January 2030. Intermediary analysis will be performed in April 2024. We expect patients with IBD to have lower scores on cognitive testing and a positive correlation between disease length and cognitive impairment level. In addition, the levels of stress, anxiety, and depression should be higher in the IBD group. The serum levels of the 4 biomarkers could correlate or anticorrelate with cognitive scores and serve as predictive factors for MCI or dementia development. A higher level of education, a younger age, the absence of malabsorption, and good disease control might serve as protectors against MCI. ConclusionsGBA interactions, along with systemic inflammation and the adverse effects of medication, might be a cause of MCI and AD development in patients with IBD. Serum biomarkers could prove cheap and useful predictors of MCI development. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05760729; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05760729 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)DERR1-10.2196/5054

    Expression of Selected Genes and Circulating microRNAs in Patients with Celiac Disease

    No full text
    Background and Objectives: Celiac disease (CD) is an immune-mediated enteropathy with characteristic intestinal alterations. CD occurs as a chronic inflammation secondary to gluten sensitivity in genetically susceptible individuals. Until now, the exact cause of the disease has not been established, which is why new studies have appeared that address the involvement of various genes and microRNAs (miRNAs) in the pathogenesis. The aim of the study is to describe the expression of selected genes (Wnt family member 3, WNT3; Wnt family member 11, WNT11; tumor necrosis factor alpha, TNFα; mitogen-activated protein kinase 1, MAPK1; AKT serine/threonine kinase 3, AKT3; phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha, PIK3CA; and cyclin D1, CCND1) and miRNAs (miR-192-5p, miR-194-5p, miR-449a and miR-638) in adult patients with CD. Materials and Methods: In total, 15 patients with CD at diagnosis (newly diagnosed), 33 patients on a gluten-free diet (GFD) for at least 1 year and 10 controls (control) were prospectively included. Blood samples were evaluated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Results: The results show that TNFα, MAPK1 and CCND1 were significantly overexpressed (p = 0.0249, p = 0.0019 and p = 0.0275, respectively) when comparing the newly diagnosed group to the controls. The other genes studied in CD patients were mostly with high values compared to controls, without reaching statistical significance. Among the miRNAs, the closest to a statistically significant value was miR-194-5p when the newly diagnosed group versus control (p = 0.0510) and GFD group versus control (p = 0.0671) were compared. The DIANA and miRNet databases identified significant functional activity for miR-449a and miR-192-5p and an interconnection of miR-194-5p and miR-449a with CCND1. Conclusions: In conclusion, genes and circulating miRNAs require further studies as they could represent important biomarkers in clinical practice

    Discharge protocol in acute pancreatitis: an international survey and cohort analysis.

    No full text
    There are several overlapping clinical practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis (AP), however, none of them contains suggestions on patient discharge. The Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group (HPSG) has recently developed a laboratory data and symptom-based discharge protocol which needs to be validated. (1) A survey was conducted involving all members of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) to understand the characteristics of international discharge protocols. (2) We investigated the safety and effectiveness of the HPSG-discharge protocol. According to our international survey, 87.5% (49/56) of the centres had no discharge protocol. Patients discharged based on protocols have a significantly shorter median length of hospitalization (LOH) (7 (5;10) days vs. 8 (5;12) days) p < 0.001), and a lower rate of readmission due to recurrent AP episodes (p = 0.005). There was no difference in median discharge CRP level among the international cohorts (p = 0.586). HPSG-protocol resulted in the shortest LOH (6 (5;9) days) and highest median CRP (35.40 (13.78; 68.40) mg/l). Safety was confirmed by the low rate of readmittance (n = 35; 5%). Discharge protocol is necessary in AP. The discharge protocol used in this study is the first clinically proven protocol. Developing and testifying further protocols are needed to better standardize patients' care

    Discharge protocol in acute pancreatitis : an international survey and cohort analysis

    No full text
    There are several overlapping clinical practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis (AP), however, none of them contains suggestions on patient discharge. The Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group (HPSG) has recently developed a laboratory data and symptom-based discharge protocol which needs to be validated. (1) A survey was conducted involving all members of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) to understand the characteristics of international discharge protocols. (2) We investigated the safety and effectiveness of the HPSG-discharge protocol. According to our international survey, 87.5% (49/56) of the centres had no discharge protocol. Patients discharged based on protocols have a significantly shorter median length of hospitalization (LOH) (7 (5;10) days vs. 8 (5;12) days) p < 0.001), and a lower rate of readmission due to recurrent AP episodes (p = 0.005). There was no difference in median discharge CRP level among the international cohorts (p = 0.586). HPSG-protocol resulted in the shortest LOH (6 (5;9) days) and highest median CRP (35.40 (13.78; 68.40) mg/l). Safety was confirmed by the low rate of readmittance (n = 35; 5%). Discharge protocol is necessary in AP. The discharge protocol used in this study is the first clinically proven protocol. Developing and testifying further protocols are needed to better standardize patients’ care.Peer reviewe
    corecore