sarcoidosis like disease mimicking metastases during adjuvant ipilimumab therapy in advanced melanoma patient ct scan and mri help in managing difficult clinical decision

The onset of an autoimmune, sarcoidosis-like reaction during or after treatment with immunomodulatory drugs as Ipilimumab is an atypical but renowned eventuality. Awareness of this scenario and its radiological features helps the Radiologist to avoid misdiagnosis of disease progression. In this case report, we present a patient operated for advanced cutaneous melanoma of the left forearm who developed hilar adenopathies with lung and splenic nodules during therapy with Ipilimumab in adjuvant setting. These findings were at first referred to as disease recurrences. Based on discrepancies between imaging, clinic and blood test findings we decided to put the patient on strict follow-up which showed a spontaneous complete regression on the visceral lesions few months after Ipilimumab withheld

Volumetric Measurements in Lung Cancer Screening Reduces Unnecessary Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scans: Results from a Single-Center Prospective Trial on 4119 Subjects

This study aims to compare the low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) outcome and volume-doubling time (VDT) derived from the measured volume (MV) and estimated volume (EV) of pulmonary nodules (PNs) detected in a single-center lung cancer screening trial. MV, EV and VDT were obtained for prevalent pulmonary nodules detected at the baseline round of the bioMILD trial. The LDCT outcome (based on bioMILD thresholds) and VDT categories were simulated on PN- and screenee-based analyses. A weighted Cohen’s kappa test was used to assess the agreement between diagnostic categories as per MV and EV, and 1583 screenees displayed 2715 pulmonary nodules. In the PN-based analysis, 40.1% PNs were included in different LDCT categories when measured by MV or EV. The agreements between MV and EV were moderate (κ = 0.49) and fair (κ = 0.37) for the LDCT outcome and VDT categories, respectively. In the screenee-based analysis, 46% pulmonary nodules were included in different LDCT categories when measured by MV or EV. The agreements between MV and EV were moderate (κ = 0.52) and fair (κ = 0.34) for the LDCT outcome and VDT categories, respectively. Within a simulated lung cancer screening based on a recommendation by estimated volumetry, the number of LDCTs performed for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules was higher compared with in prospective volumetric management

Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake Measured by Positron Emission Tomography and Standardized Uptake Value Predicts Long-Term Survival of CT Screening Detected Lung Cancer in Heavy Smokers

n/

Diagnostic yield and accuracy of image-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of paediatric solid tumours: An experience from Italy

Abstract Background Percutaneous core needle biopsy (PCNB) has become an accepted method to collect tumour tissue samples given its safety, minimal invasiveness, high accuracy and cost-effectiveness. Procedure It is a single centre, retrospective evaluation of 213 ultrasound (US) or computed tomography (CT) guided PCNBs of paediatric solid tumours performed from 2005 to 2017. Safety, diagnostic yield, accuracy, and efficacy assessments of the PCNB procedure were performed. Univariate logistic models were applied to assess the relation of the diagnostic yield with patient, procedure and lesion features. Results The image-guide was US in 91.08% of biopsies; the needle gauge was ≥16 G in 69.01% of the biopsies. The anatomical site of lesion was deep in 113 biopsies (53.05%). The nature of the lesion was the only factor associated with diagnostic yield (OR: 4.04; 95% CI 1.23–13.28; p: 0.022), with benign lesion as an unfavourable factor. Complication incidence was 1.41%. Overall, the diagnostic yield of PCNB was 93.90% (95% CI: 89.79-96.71%), the diagnostic accuracy was 96.86% (95% CI: 93.29–98.84%) and the diagnostic efficacy was 93.33% (95% CI: 86.75–97.28%). Sensitivity was 97.94% (95% CI: 92.75–99.75%) and specificity 100% (95% CI: 66.37–100%). Conclusion PCNB can be recommended as the first-choice method for solid tumours diagnosis in paediatric, adolescent and young adult patients because of its high diagnostic success, safety and accessibility

Stopping Smoking Reduces Mortality in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening Participants

Abstract Introduction The National Lung Screening Trial has achieved a 7% reduction in total mortality with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening as compared with in the chest radiography arm. Other randomized trials are under way, comparing LDCT screening with no intervention. None of these studies was designed to investigate the impact of smoking habits on screening outcome. In the present study, we tested the effect of stopping smoking on the overall mortality of participants undergoing repeated LDCT screening for many years. Methods Between 2000 and 2010, 3381 smokers aged 50 years or older were enrolled in two LDCT screening programs. On the basis of the last follow-up information, subjects were divided into two groups: current smokers throughout the screening period and former smokers. Results With a median follow-up time of 9.7 years and a total of 32,857 person-years (PYs) of follow-up, a total of 151 deaths were observed in the group of 1797 current smokers (17,846 PYs) versus 109 among 1584 former smokers (15,011 PYs), corresponding to mortality rates of 8.46 and 7.26 for every 1000 PYs, respectively. Compared with current smokers, former smokers had an adjusted mortality hazard ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval: 0.44–0.83), with a 39% reduction in mortality. A similar reduction in mortality was observed in the subset of 712 late quitters, with a hazard ratio of 0.65 (95% confidence interval: 0.44–0.96). Conclusions Stopping smoking significantly reduces the overall mortality of smokers enrolled in LDCT screening programs. The beneficial effect of stopping smoking on total mortality appears to be threefold to fivefold greater than the one achieved by earlier detection in the National Lung Screening Trial

Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening: comparison of performance between annual and biennial screen

Objectives: To compare the performance metrics of two different strategies of lung cancer screening by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), namely, annual (LDCT1) or biennial (LDCT2) screen. Methods: Recall rate, detection rate, interval cancers, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) were compared between LDCT1 and LDCT2 arms of the MILD trial over the first seven (T0-T6; median follow-up 7.3 years) and four rounds (T0-T3; median follow-up 7.3 years), respectively. Results: 1152 LDCT1 and 1151 LDCT2 participants underwent a total of 6893 and 4715 LDCT scans, respectively. The overall recall rate was higher in LDCT2 arm (6.97 %) than in LDCT1 arm (5.81 %) (p = 0.01), which was counterbalanced by the overall lower number of LDCT scans. No difference was observed for the overall detection rate (0.56 % in both arms). The two LDCT arms had similar specificity (99.2 % in both arms), sensitivity (73.5 %, in LDCT2 vs. 68.5 % in LDCT1, p = 0.62), PPV (42.4 %, in LDCT2, vs. 40.6 %, in LDCT1, p = 0.83) and NPV (99.8 %, in LDCT2 vs. 99.7 %, in LDCT1, p = 0.71). Conclusion: Biennial screen may save about one third of LDCT scans with similar performance indicators as compared to annual screening.Key Points: • Biennial LDCT screening may be as efficient as the annual screening.• Annual and biennial LDCT screening have similar frequency of interval lung cancers.• Biennial screening may save about one third of LDCT scans

[Lung cancer screening in high-risk subjects: early detection with LDCT and risk stratification using miRNA-based blood test]

Lung cancer still remains a high mortality disease in the face of developments in diagnostic and therapeutic methods that occurred in the last 20 years. The analysis of the experiences from the first studies - in which chest X-ray (CXR) was adopted, associated or not with sputum cytology - has failed to show a reduction in lung cancer specific mortality. Subsequent screening studies that have introduced the use of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) have revealed a large number of early-stage lung cancers, thus potentially curable; however, this has not allowed us to demonstrate a decrease in lung cancer-specific mortality. With the results of the American study National Lung ScreeningTrial (NLST), published in 2011, for the first time a lung cancer-specific mortality reduction by 20% thanks to the use of LDCT compared to RXT, was highlighted. However, a false positive rate of 96.4% was also described with an overdiagnosis that can be up to 78.9%for bronchioalveolar lung cancer. Due to the high sensitivity of LDCT, able to identify a non-calcified pulmonary nodule in one subject on two, it becomes necessary to avail instruments to more accurately identify suspicious nodules. Until some time ago, the possible use of lung tumour markers was not viable in view of the poor organ specificity. The study and development was, then, pushed to organ- and tissue-specific markers such as microRNA (miRNA), noncoding RNA sequences involved in many processes and expression of oncogenic activity of the microenvironment. The use of biomarkers such as circulating miRNA implemented in LDCT screening has highlighted a reduction of 5 times for the rate of false positives, going from 19.4% to 3.7%, with a sensitivity of 87%, a specificity of 81%, and a negative predictive value of 99%. The need to appropriately use the available resources commensurate with the disease to treat will push more and more towards the implementation of LDCT biomarkers based screenings, stable and easily reproducible, as circulating miRNAs, obviating to problems such as false positives, unnecessary procedures of invasive surgery for benign lesions, and optimizing the cost benefit ratios.The development of new specific biomarkers appears to offer new promising prospects

Yttrium-90 radioembolization for intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase 2 study

n/

Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening: Comparison of Performance Between Annual and Biennial Screen

Aims and objectives The Multicenter Italian Lung Detection (MILD) was a lung cancer screening trial by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) with peculiar design. Participant in MILD trial were randomized to two different LDCT arms, namely annual LDCT (LDCT1) and biennial LDCT (LDCT2). The aim of this study was to compare the performance metrics between two different strategies of lung cancer screening by LDCT. Methods and materials Randomization of study population Consenting participants in the MILD trial were randomly assigned into two arms: a) control arm undergoing primary prevention program with pulmonary function test and blood sample collection; b) LDCT arm undergoing the same primary prevention program and LDCT. The LDCT arm was further randomized into two subgroups: LDCT1 with annual LDCT scan; LDCT2 with biennial LDCT scan. Results Participants of LDCT arms underwent: 6893 LDCTs in LDCT1 4715 LDCTs in LDCT2 A median of 6 ± 1.7 follow-up LDCT1 scans and 3 ± 1.7 follow-up LDCT2 scans over a median follow up of 7.3 years were obtained. The LDCT arms were similar for nodules number: 1418 nodules detected in LDCT1 1392 nodules detected in LDCT2. Participants adherence was maintained susbstantial untill T6 and T3 rounds for the LDCT1 and LDCT2 participants, respectively (Fig. 1, 2). Conclusion Recall rate and detection rate are high priority targets for optimization of lung cancer screening, along with reduction of screens. This study shows that a biennial screening may be at least as efficient as the annual screening in terms of detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV. The slightly higher total recall rate in the LDCT2 arm was counterbalanced by the lower number of scans, notably, about two thirds of scans performed in LDCT1 arm