Pharmacologic treatment of status epilepticus

Status epilepticus (SE) requires rapid identification of its cause and urgent pharmacological treatment. Despite an estimated incidence of up to 61 per 100,000 per year, evidence from high-class clinical trials is only available for the early stages of SE. Areas covered: Following a four-stage approach of SE (early, established, refractory and super-refractory), we present pharmacological treatment options and their clinical utility. Expert opinion: Intravenous lorazepam and intramuscular midazolam appear as most effective treatments for early SE. In children, buccal midazolam has emerged as first-line non-intravenous drug with similar efficacy and safety to other intravenous or rectal benzodiazepines. In established SE intravenous antiepileptic drugs are in use. There are no double-blind, but six randomized open studies with valproate and two with levetiracetam. A meta-analysis found higher rates of seizure cessation with valproate 75.7% (95% CI 63.7-84.8) and phenobarbital 73.6%, (95% CI 58.3-84.8) than with levetiracetam (68.5%, 95% CI 56.2-78.7) or phenytoin (50.2%, 95% CI 34.2-66.1). Based on the favourable tolerability profile of levetiracetam and valproate, the authors prefer these drugs in established SE over phenytoin. Treatment options in refractory SE are intravenous anaesthetics. In super-refractory SE ketamine, magnesium, steroids and other drugs have been used with variable outcomes. At this stage therapeutic decisions are based on doctors' preferences, patient factors such as age and comorbidity, and cause of SE, if identified

Perampanel in the treatment of status epilepticus: A systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE: Perampanel (PER) is a noncompetitive \u3b2-amino-3-(5-methyl-3-oxo-1,2-oxazol-4-yl)propionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist with demonstrated efficacy in animal models of status epilepticus (SE). We performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the efficacy and tolerability of PER in the treatment of refractory and super-refractory SE. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL (accessed from inception to April 30, 2018) to identify studies evaluating oral PER as treatment of SE of any type. We also searched the OpenGrey repository and conference proceedings of international congresses by the International League Against Epilepsy and by the American Epilepsy Society from 2012 onwards. RESULTS: Ten articles were included, with a total of 69 episodes of SE occurring in 68 patients (aged 18 to 91\u202fyears). The type and etiology of SE varied remarkably across studies. The number of drugs used prior to PER ranged from 1 to 9. The time from SE onset to PER administration ranged from 9.25\u202fh to 35\u202fdays. The initial PER dose ranged from 2 to 32\u202fmg. The proportion of patients achieving clinical SE cessation varied from 17% to 100%. The time from PER administration to SE cessation ranged from 1\u202fh to 4\u202fweeks. CONCLUSIONS: The currently available evidence supporting the use of PER in SE is weak and hampered by several confounding factors. Further studies should be performed in more clinically homogeneous and larger cohorts to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PER administered in earlier stages of SE, at higher dosages, and at intervals shorter than 24\u202fh

Perampanel for the treatment of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in idiopathic generalized epilepsy

The non-competitive \u3b1-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) - receptor antagonist perampanel (PER) was approved in 2015 for treatment of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (pGTCS). The aim of this narrative review is to summarize available data on pharmacological properties, efficacy and tolerability of PER in pGTCs

The ILAE definition of drug resistant epilepsy and its clinical applicability compared with “older” established definitions

Background. Early identification of potential epilepsy surgery candidates is essential to the treatment process

The ILAE definition of drug resistant epilepsy and its clinical applicability compared with “older” established definitions

Background. Early identification of potential epilepsy surgery candidates is essential to the treatment process. Aim. To evaluate the clinical applicability of the ILAE definition of drug resistant epilepsy and its potential in identifying surgical candidates earlier compared to three established “older” definitions of drug resistant epilepsy. Material and Methods. Retrospective analysis of 174 patients who underwent epilepsy surgery between 1998 and 2009. Clinical factors and course of disease were extracted from patients' charts. Drug resistant epilepsy was classified according to four definitions and the time until fulfillment of criteria compared. Results. Mean time to fulfillment of criteria of drug resistant epilepsy ranged from 11.8 (standard deviation (SD) 9.8) to 15.6 years (SD 11.3). Time to drug resistance was significantly longer applying the only definition, requiring failure of three antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (Canada definition), whereas time to fulfillment of all other definitions did not differ. Fifty percent of all patients experienced a seizure free period of 1 year prior to being classified as drug resistant, 13% entered another 1-year remission after fulfilling any criteria for drug resistance. Conclusion. We conclude that the ILAE definition identifies drug resistant epilepsy, with similar latency like two of three formerly used definitions. It is an easy applicable tool to minimize the delay of referral to a specialized center. Intermittent remissions delay assessment of drug resistance for all definitions and 13% of patients enter a remission despite established drug resistance.(VLID)177180

Status epilepticus in the elderly\u2014A retrospective study on 120 patients

PURPOSE: Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the most common neurological emergencies with a high incidence in the elderly. Major determinants of prognosis are patients' age, duration of SE and underlying etiology. We aimed identifying differences in clinical presentation of SE, etiologies and outcome between patients (pts.) sixty years or older ( 6560) and younger than sixty (<60) years (yrs). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 120 patients (48 women) with SE admitted to the Neurological Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Department of Neurology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Austria between 1/2011 and 01/2013. KEY FINDINGS: Median age was 69 years (range 14-90) (63% 6560yrs). Generalized tonic clonic SE was the most common SE type, whereas non convulsive SE with and without coma tended to occur more frequently in the elderly (33% 6560 yrs. vs. 20%<60 yrs, Chi2=3.511, p=0.061). Preexisting history of epilepsy was more common in the younger age group (64% vs 41% p=0.014). An acute symptomatic cause of SE was identified in 25% (31/120), with cerebrovascular diseases being more frequent in the elderly (47% vs. 11%; p<0.01). Duration of SE did not differ between the age groups (p=0.63). Mortality was higher in elderly patients (31% vs. 7%, p=0.028, Chi Square=5.18) and moderate disability in younger patients (42% vs 17%; p=0.005, Chi Square=7.83). After Bonferroni correction only the higher rate of cerebrovascular etiologies in the elderly was statistically significant. SIGNIFICANCE: In the elder population, SE occurs more often in patients without preexisting epilepsy and is most frequently caused by cerebrovascular diseases. NCSE tends to be more frequent in the elderly and diagnosis is complicated by subtle clinical presentation. Even though comorbidities represent treatment limitations, in our sample no differences in choice of AED as well as dosage were observed between the age groups, reflecting a trend toward AEDs with more favorable adverse event profile in all patients. SE in older patients is associated with poorer outcome and higher mortality