Modeling and performance evaluation of a robotic treatment couch for tumor tracking

Tumor motion during radiation therapy increases the irradiation of healthy tissue. However, this problem may be mitigated by moving the patient via the treatment couch such that the tumor motion relative to the beam is minimized. The treatment couch poses limitations to the potential mitigation, thus the performance of the Protura (CIVCO) treatment couch was characterized and numerically modeled. The unknown parameters were identified using chirp signals and verified with one-dimensional tumor tracking. The Protura tracked chirp signals well up to 0.2 Hz in both longitudinal and vertical directions. If only the vertical or only the longitudinal direction was tracked, the Protura tracked well up to 0.3 Hz. However, there was unintentional yet substantial lateral motion in the former case. And during vertical motion, the extension caused rotation of the Protura around the lateral axis. The numerical model matched the Protura up to 0.3 Hz. Even though the Protura was designed for static positioning, it was able to reduce the tumor motion by 69% (median). The correlation coefficient between the tumor motion reductions of the Protura and the model was 0.99. Therefore, the model allows tumor-tracking results of the Protura to be predicted

Modeling and performance evaluation of a robotic treatment couch for tumor tracking

Tumor motion during radiation therapy increases the irradiation of healthy tissue. However, this problem may be mitigated by moving the patient via the treatment couch such that the tumor motion relative to the beam is minimized. The treatment couch poses limitations to the potential mitigation, thus the performance of the Protura (CIVCO) treatment couch was characterized and numerically modeled. The unknown parameters were identified using chirp signals and verified with one-dimensional tumor tracking. The Protura tracked chirp signals well up to 0.2 Hz in both longitudinal and vertical directions. If only the vertical or only the longitudinal direction was tracked, the Protura tracked well up to 0.3 Hz. However, there was unintentional yet substantial lateral motion in the former case. And during vertical motion, the extension caused rotation of the Protura around the lateral axis. The numerical model matched the Protura up to 0.3 Hz. Even though the Protura was designed for static positioning, it was able to reduce the tumor motion by 69% (median). The correlation coefficient between the tumor motion reductions of the Protura and the model was 0.99. Therefore, the model allows tumor-tracking results of the Protura to be predicted

COTS for (Deep) Space Missions

The usage of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) technologies in (deep) space missions might be a risk for the mission. But sometimes radiation tolerant parts are not feasible due to space or performance requirements. This paper gives a brief overview of the usage of COTS in (deep) space missions at the DLR Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics and the associated radiation assurance activities

COTS for (Deep) Space Missions

The usage of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) technologies in (deep) space missions might be a risk for the mission. But sometimes radiation tolerant parts are not feasible due to space or performance requirements. This paper gives a brief overview of the usage of COTS in (deep) space missions at the DLR Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics and the associated radiation assurance activities

The ideal couch tracking system - Requirements and evaluation of current systems

INTRODUCTION: Intrafractional motion can cause substantial uncertainty in precision radiotherapy. Traditionally, the target volume is defined to be sufficiently large to cover the tumor in every position. With the robotic treatment couch, a real-time motion compensation can improve tumor coverage and organ at risk sparing. However, this approach poses additional requirements, which are systematically developed and which allow the ideal robotic couch to be specified. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data of intrafractional tumor motion were collected and analyzed regarding motion range, frequency, speed, and acceleration. Using this data, ideal couch requirements were formulated. The four robotic couches Protura, Perfect Pitch, RoboCouch, and RPSbase were tested with respect to these requirements. RESULTS: The data collected resulted in maximum speed requirements of 60 mm/s in all directions and maximum accelerations of 80 mm/s2 in the longitudinal, 60 mm/s2 in the lateral, and 30 mm/s2 in the vertical direction. While the two robotic couches RoboCouch and RPSbase completely met the requirements, even these two showed a substantial residual motion (40% of input amplitude), arguably due to their time delays. CONCLUSION: The requirements for the motion compensation by an ideal couch are formulated and found to be feasible for currently available robotic couches. However, the performance these couches can be improved further regarding the position control if the demanded speed and acceleration are taken into account as well

Unconscious physiological response of healthy volunteers to dynamic respiration-synchronized couch motion

BACKGROUND Intrafractional motion can be a substantial uncertainty in precision radiotherapy. Conventionally, the target volume is expanded to account for the motion. Couch-tracking is an alternative, where the patient is moved to compensate for the tumor motion. However, the couch motion may influence the patient's stress and respiration behavior decreasing the couch-tracking effectiveness. METHODS In total, 100 volunteers were positioned supine on a robotic couch, which moved dynamically and respiration synchronized. During the measurement, the skin conductivity, the heartrate, and the gaze location were measured indicating the volunteer's stress. Volunteers rated the subjective motion sickness using a questionnaire. The measurement alternated between static and tracking segments (three cycles), each 1 min long. RESULTS The respiration amplitude showed no significant difference between tracking and static segments, but decreased significantly from the first to the last tracking segment (p < 0.0001). The respiration frequency differed significantly between tracking and static segments (p < 0.0001), but not between the first and the last tracking segment. The physiological parameters and the questionnaire showed mild signals of stress and motion sickness. CONCLUSION Generally, people tolerated the couch motions. The interaction between couch motion and the patient's breathing pattern should be considered for a clinical implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02820532) and the Swiss national clinical trials portal ( SNCTP000001878 ) on June 20, 2016