Управление качеством российского инженерного образования

В данном исследовании предложена модель управления качеством образования, методика проведения занятия, в которой используется компетентностная модель, основанная на проектно-ориентированном, сетецентрическом (кибефизическом) подходе.This study proposes a model for managing the quality of education, a methodology for conducting a lesson, which uses a competency model based on a project-oriented, network-centric (cybephysical) approach

2002-223.oct

ABSTRACT. Objective. To determine for patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) which factors are associated with disability and restricted body function. Methods. In 1538 patients with AS, occiput-to-wall distance, chest expansion, cervical rotation, finger-floor distance, and modified Schober test were measured cross-sectionally, and for each measure the patient's respective percentile was calculated. The mean of the 5 percentiles was summarized in the mobility restriction score (MRS). In addition, patients answered questions on disease progression and completed the Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI) questionnaire. All data were coded into 40 variables, used as independent variables in multiple regression analyses to identify factors associated with BASFI and MRS

In Painful Shoulder Disease, Inpatient Rehabilitation has Long Term Benefits with or without Therapeutic Nuclear Magnetic Resonance: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Introduction: The aim of the presented study was to investigate the effect of an inpatient rehabilitation stay with application of therapeutical nuclear magnetic resonance therapy (NMRT) in 150 patients with painful shoulder diseases in a controlled trial.Methods: In a double blinded placebo-controlled multicenter study during a three-week inpatient rehabilitation pain, sleep quality, shoulder function, respectively biomarkers for stress and pain by treatment series with therapeutical nuclear magnetic resonance (NMRT) applied as an additive treatment with a series of NMR on nine consecutive days (9 x 1h) was investigated.Results: Virtually all (except sleep quality) investigated parameters, mainly pain (VAS) and function (Quick Dash) improved significantly during and after the rehabilitation programme in both study groups. We found no additional effect between the group that received rehabilitation without NMRT and the group with rehabilitation programme plus active NMRT at any time of the six month follow up.&nbsp;Conclusion: In fact, a good outcome of the rehabilitation programme became obvious whereas, the NMR therapy did not result in a verifiable, additive effect. Therefore, one might consider that a possible positive effect by the NMRT on painful shoulder affections is masked by the obviously effective rehabilitation programme to treat the very complex shoulder joint.</p