Wilson - Vineyard Landscape Data

Data is divided by tabs. "FirstRoundEarlySeason", "EarlySeason" and "LateSeason" contain yellow sticky-trap data from each of these three time periods. "Spiders" contains spider family counts from beat sheet sampling. "Parasitism" contains data on parasitism on 1st and 2nd generation E. elegantula eggs. "SiteDetails" contains data on key vineyard characteristics as well as crop vigor and landscape diversity

Response of Spiders to Landscape Diversity and <i>E</i>. <i>elegantula</i> Density (n = 53).

<p>*Common species are based on previous surveys in this region [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0141752#pone.0141752.ref044" target="_blank">44</a>, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0141752#pone.0141752.ref054" target="_blank">54</a>–<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0141752#pone.0141752.ref056" target="_blank">56</a>].</p><p>Response of Spiders to Landscape Diversity and <i>E</i>. <i>elegantula</i> Density (n = 53).</p

Peak second generation <i>E</i>. <i>elegantula</i> was lower at sites with high first generation parasitism rates.

<p>Peak second generation <i>E</i>. <i>elegantula</i> was lower at sites with high first generation parasitism rates.</p

Higher ratios of <i>Anagrus</i> to <i>E</i>. <i>elegantula</i> led to increased parasitism of both first generation (6a) and second generation (6b) <i>E</i>. <i>elegantula</i> eggs.

<p>Higher ratios of <i>Anagrus</i> to <i>E</i>. <i>elegantula</i> led to increased parasitism of both first generation (6a) and second generation (6b) <i>E</i>. <i>elegantula</i> eggs.</p

Current year early season density of <i>E</i>. <i>elegantula</i> is determined by late season density in the previous year.

<p>Current year early season density of <i>E</i>. <i>elegantula</i> is determined by late season density in the previous year.</p

Key Characteristics of Cultivars and Rootstocks at the Study Sites [47].

<p>Key Characteristics of Cultivars and Rootstocks at the Study Sites [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0141752#pone.0141752.ref047" target="_blank">47</a>].</p

Peak second generation <i>E</i>. <i>elegantula</i> densities were higher on vines with increased total petiole nitrogen content.

<p>Peak second generation <i>E</i>. <i>elegantula</i> densities were higher on vines with increased total petiole nitrogen content.</p

Results from the Analysis of <i>Anagrus</i> and <i>E</i>. <i>elegantula</i> Abundance and Parasitism Rate.

<p>Results from the Analysis of <i>Anagrus</i> and <i>E</i>. <i>elegantula</i> Abundance and Parasitism Rate.</p

Peak second generation <i>E</i>. <i>elegantula</i> densities were influenced by grape cultivar (3a) and rootstock (3b).

<p>Peak second generation <i>E</i>. <i>elegantula</i> densities were influenced by grape cultivar (3a) and rootstock (3b).</p

Number of Study Sites with Specific Cultivar-Rootstock Combinations.

<p>Number of Study Sites with Specific Cultivar-Rootstock Combinations.</p