12 research outputs found
Civilizational deadlock of the economy of growth
The key topic of the paper is determined by the crisis situation of the nowadays economic model. Capitalism is the dominant economic form in the global economy. Varieties of capitalism exist ranging from state capitalism to neo liberalism but all are pervaded by a dominant theme, an egocentric economy model or ego-economics. This model is underlain by postulates of the need for a continued growth spurred by end-use. The realisation of this model is provided by monetary approaches and stimulation of consumer demand as the main driver of economic growth. The key tools for stimulating demand in this model of economy are competition, information impact on the consumer consciousness and choices, the massive accessibility of credit, the massive accessibility of financial markets and financial instruments, the actualisation of passive incomes as opposed to creative labour, and other degradation triggering factors. The crowning part of this model is the debt economy of consumption of societies of individualists who do not share traditional systems of values but are guided by illusory, temporary, short-term objectives. Thus, the egocentric economy model established dominance in relation to the ecological economy model, exposing a bulk of contradictions in principles underlying the system and promotes unsustainability. The future turned out to be in jeopardy... The paper contrasts ego-economics and ecoeconomics, traces of the emergence of the first one and the need for the second one as a necessary condition for long-term sustainability
Well-being: Subjective and Objective Aspects
The subject of well-being has always excited human society. Various official and scientific research documents have sought to outline the design and content of well-being, but the specific definition depends on the conceptual approach employed: the process, system, or other aspect. The purpose of this research is to create an integrated, multi-component model that can ensure the continued well-being of modern man. The modern man can be defined with regard to two levels of well-being: internal (subjective) and external (objective). Inner well-being is seen as a human, spiritual well-being associated with one's personal characteristics and features. External well-being develops from the perspective of perception and one's evaluation of human society. Each level consists of four key contextual attributes that together constitute well-being: 1) one's existence in accordance with their natural essence (in harmony with others and the environment); 2) an innate understanding of what is good for oneself, and the presence of the ability and willingness to achieve it; 3) one's the ability to realize their human potential and plan for life; 4) the creation of a society and empowering people to fulfill the above stated positions 1, 2, 3, and increase activity and awareness. Such specification of the category βwell-beingβ gives us an opportunity to distinguish between personal well-being of an individual and social well-being of member of society and state. Only discoursing in the framework of such conceptually comprehensive logic, it is possible to derive the βformulaβ of the well-being of human and society
Third Kim is a new leader of North Korea. βDark-horseβ of the international community
The article is devoted to the internal situation that has arisen in North Korea after the death of the βGreat leaderβ. It should be noted that formerly unknown person was nominated for the post of head of the country. The article gives valuable information about personal qualities and biography of the new leader of North Korea. The main idea of the article is to attempt to describe the personal and political portrait of North Korean leader and formulate some probability forecasts of its foreign and domestic policy.Π‘ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ Π·Π°ΡΡΠ°Π³ΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ, ΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ²ΡΡΡΡΡ Π² Π‘Π΅Π²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΎΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ "ΠΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Ρ". Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅Ρ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π²Π΅ΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ° ΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π²Π΅ΡΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·Ρ Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅- ΠΈ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΡΡΠ°
Third Kim is a new leader of North Korea. βDark-horseβ of the international community
The article is devoted to the internal situation that has arisen in North Korea after the death of the βGreat leaderβ. It should be noted that formerly unknown person was nominated for the post of head of the country. The article gives valuable information about personal qualities and biography of the new leader of North Korea. The main idea of the article is to attempt to describe the personal and political portrait of North Korean leader and formulate some probability forecasts of its foreign and domestic policy.Π‘ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ Π·Π°ΡΡΠ°Π³ΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ, ΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ²ΡΡΡΡΡ Π² Π‘Π΅Π²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠΎΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ "ΠΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Ρ". Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅Ρ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π²Π΅ΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ° ΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π²Π΅ΡΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·Ρ Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅- ΠΈ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΡΡΡΠ°
World War II in Memory of Generations
Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ° ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΠΌΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΠ°Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎ ΠΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π²ΠΎΠΉΠ½Π΅, ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π²ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ Π·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΠ± ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΈΡΡ
. ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΊΡ Π²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Ρ ΡΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ°. ΠΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΡ ΡΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎ ΠΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π²ΠΎΠΉΠ½Π΅ Π² ΠΏΠ°ΠΌΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ.The article analyzes the results of a survey of students of the Amur State Medical Academy on the subject of awareness of the Second World War. The survey showed a High level of knowledge about these events. The authors made an attempt to identify the reasons for the indicated result of the sociological survey. Mechanisms for storing information about the Second World War in the memory of the modern generation are proposed
Innovative Technics of Managing Engineers' Global Competencies
Higher education modernization in the CIS countries takes place under the conditions of dynamic changes in economy and society. These changes are determined by the social and economic development of the country and the world globalization processes - cross-border intercultural communication, knowledge transparency, and the establishment of information society. Educational globalization is a continuous process of creating a unified global educational system, in which the distinctions between its member educational systems are being blended
Civilizational deadlock of the economy of growth
The key topic of the paper is determined by the crisis situation of the nowadays economic model. Capitalism is the dominant economic form in the global economy. Varieties of capitalism exist ranging from state capitalism to neo liberalism but all are pervaded by a dominant theme, an egocentric economy model or ego-economics. This model is underlain by postulates of the need for a continued growth spurred by end-use. The realisation of this model is provided by monetary approaches and stimulation of consumer demand as the main driver of economic growth. The key tools for stimulating demand in this model of economy are competition, information impact on the consumer consciousness and choices, the massive accessibility of credit, the massive accessibility of financial markets and financial instruments, the actualisation of passive incomes as opposed to creative labour, and other degradation triggering factors. The crowning part of this model is the debt economy of consumption of societies of individualists who do not share traditional systems of values but are guided by illusory, temporary, short-term objectives. Thus, the egocentric economy model established dominance in relation to the ecological economy model, exposing a bulk of contradictions in principles underlying the system and promotes unsustainability. The future turned out to be in jeopardy... The paper contrasts ego-economics and ecoeconomics, traces of the emergence of the first one and the need for the second one as a necessary condition for long-term sustainability
What Is Well-Being In The Modern Society: Objective View
The topic of the well-being of human and society has always interested the great thinkers of the humankind. However, conceptually, as a problem of the state and public, this topic fully emerged only in the aftermath of the Second World War in the past century, and it became especially topical in the mid-60s, when a special organization was founded on the basis of the United Nations Organization, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP, 1965). Well-being became a popular topic for various sociopolitical, socio-economic, cultural, and historical theoretical research and applied programmes. However, there is no unanimously agreed definition of this category or an unanimously agreed approach to its research and evaluation of its value and importance to the human and the society. The present article continues a cycle of the authorβs articles devoted to the research of human well-being in nowadays conditions. It looks into the basic concepts, conceptual grounds, and contradictions shaping the key aspects of this broad topic, as well as the fundamental causes and possible methodological misconceptions influencing both their development and the attitude to them of a human, society, state. The article provides extensive statistical data which illustrate the enormous, egregious ill-being of a large part of human society in the modern world. Also, in the article we have undertaken an attempt to define well-being as a multiple-aspect concept and to present a detailed analysis of fundamental causes of the modern ill-being on a massive scale