Analytic lymph node number establishes staging accuracy by occult tumor burden in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recurrence in lymph node-negative (pN0) colorectal cancer suggests the presence of undetected occult metastases. Occult tumor burden in nodes estimated by GUCY2C RT-qPCR predicts risk of disease recurrence. This study explored the impact of the number of nodes analyzed by RT-qPCR (analytic) on the prognostic utility of occult tumor burden. METHODS: Lymph nodes (range: 2-159) from 282 prospectively enrolled pN0 colorectal cancer patients, followed for a median of 24 months (range: 2-63), were analyzed by GUCY2C RT-qPCR. Prognostic risk categorization defined using occult tumor burden was the primary outcome measure. Association of prognostic variables and risk category were defined by multivariable polytomous and semi-parametric polytomous logistic regression. RESULTS: Occult tumor burden stratified this pN0 cohort into categories of low (60%; recurrence rate (RR) = 2.3% [95% CI 0.1-4.5%]), intermediate (31%; RR = 33.3% [23.7-44.1%]), and high (9%; RR = 68.0% [46.5-85.1%], P \u3c 0.001) risk of recurrence. Beyond race and T stage, the number of analytic nodes was an independent marker of risk category (P \u3c 0.001). When \u3e12 nodes were analyzed, occult tumor burden almost completely resolved prognostic risk classification of pN0 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic utility of occult tumor burden assessed by GUCY2C RT-qPCR is dependent on the number of analytic lymph nodes

Association of GUCY2C expression in lymph nodes with time to recurrence and disease-free survival in pN0 colorectal cancer.

CONTEXT: The established relationship between lymph node metastasis and prognosis in colorectal cancer suggests that recurrence in 25% of patients with lymph nodes free of tumor cells by histopathology (pN0) reflects the presence of occult metastases. Guanylyl cyclase 2C (GUCY2C) is a marker expressed by colorectal tumors that could reveal occult metastases in lymph nodes and better estimate recurrence risk. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of occult lymph node metastases detected by quantifying GUCY2C messenger RNA, using the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, with recurrence and survival in patients with colorectal cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective study of 257 patients with pN0 colorectal cancer enrolled between March 2002 and June 2007 at 9 US and Canadian centers (7 academic medical centers and 2 community hospitals) provided 2570 fresh lymph nodes measuring 5 mm or larger for histopathology and GUCY2C messenger RNA analysis. Patients were followed up for a median of 24 months (range, 2-63 months) for disease recurrence or death. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to recurrence (primary outcome) and disease-free survival (secondary outcome) relative to expression of GUCY2C in lymph nodes. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (12.5%) had lymph nodes negative for GUCY2C (pN0 [mol-]), and all but 2 remained free of disease during follow-up (recurrence rate, 6.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8%-20.8%). Conversely, 225 patients (87.5%) had lymph nodes positive for GUCY2C (pN0 [mol+]), and 47 developed recurrent disease (20.9%; 95% CI, 15.8%-26.8%) (P = .006). Multivariate analyses revealed that GUCY2C in lymph nodes was an independent marker of prognosis. Patients who were pN0 (mol+) exhibited earlier time to recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.66; 95% CI, 1.11-19.57; P = .04) and reduced disease-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.15-9.29; P = .03). CONCLUSION: Expression of GUCY2C in histologically negative lymph nodes appears to be independently associated with time to recurrence and disease-free survival in patients with pN0 colorectal cancer

Antimicrobial Drugs and Community–acquired Clostridium difficile–associated Disease, UK

In a population-based case-control study of community-acquired Clostridium difficile–associated disease (CDAD), we matched 1,233 cases to 12,330 controls. CDAD risk increased 3-fold with use of any antimicrobial agent and 6-fold with use of fluoroquinolones. Prior use of antimicrobial agent did not affect risk for CDAD after 6 months

Omeprazole compared with misoprostol for ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs

Background: Misoprostol is effective for ulcers associated with the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) but is often poorly tolerated because of diarrhea and abdominal pain. We compared the efficacy of omeprazole and misoprostol in healing and preventing ulcers associated with NSAIDs. Methods: in a double-blind study, we randomly assigned 935 patients who required continuous NSAID therapy and who had ulcers or more than 10 erosions in the stomach or duodenum (or both) to receive 20 mg or 40 mg of omeprazole orally in the morning or 200 microg of misoprostol orally four times daily. Patients were treated for four weeks or, in the absence of healing, eight weeks. Treatment success was defined as the absence of ulcers and the presence of fewer than five erosions at each site and not more than mild dyspepsia. We then randomly reassigned 732 patients in whom treatment was successful to maintenance therapy with 20 mg of omeprazole daily, 200 microg of misoprostol twice daily, or placebo for six months. Results: at eight weeks, treatment was successful in 76 percent of the patients given 20 mg of omeprazole (233 of 308), 75 percent of those given 40 mg of omeprazole (237 of 315), and 71 percent of those given misoprostol (212 of 298). The rates of gastric-ulcer healing were significantly higher with 20 mg of omeprazole (but not 40 mg of omeprazole) than with misoprostol. Healing rates among patients with duodenal ulcers were higher with either dose of omeprazole than with misoprostol, whereas healing rates among patients with erosions alone were higher with misoprostol. More patients remained in remission during maintenance treatment with omeprazole (61 percent) than with misoprostol (48 percent, P=0.001) and with either drug than with placebo (27 percent, P<0.001). There were more adverse events during the healing phase in the misoprostol group than in the groups given 20 mg and 40 mg of omeprazole (59 percent, 48 percent, and 46 percent, respectively). Conclusions: the overall rates of successful treatment of ulcers, erosions, and symptoms associated with NSAIDs were similar for the two doses of omeprazole and misoprostol. Maintenance therapy with omeprazole was associated with a lower rate of relapse than misoprostol. Omeprazole was better tolerated than misoprostol

letter to tHe eDitor

Bhat M, Lu Y, Marcil V, et al. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha polymorphism increases the risk for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking proton pump inhibitors. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;28(9):488. To the Editor: Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is associated with significant morbidity, affecting 50 to 150 per 100,000 adults annually (1). Patients with NVUGIB may present with melena, hematochezia or coffee-ground emesis, often accompanied by a decrease in hemoglobin levels and even hemodynamic instability. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and Helicobacter pylori infection are the principal risk factors for NVUGIB, accounting for &gt;95% of cases. Taking proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is a known protective factor against NVUGIB. There has recently been growing interest in a possible genetic predisposition to NVUGIB, with investigation of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with bleeding events. Of particular interest have been mutations in proinflammatory genes or genes that regulate NSAID/PPI metabolism, which may contribute to excessive inflammation and ulceration in the context of H pylori infection and NSAID use. A recent pharmacogenomic study The above literature describing a genetic predisposition for bleeding events applies principally to East Asian patient populations. Therefore, we decided to study whether such genetic associations could be elicited in the Canadian context. We performed a pilot study to assess the association of SNPs involved in NSAID metabolism (CYP2C9) and inflammatory response (TNF-α) with NVUGIB events. Patients who were part of the REASON-II NVUGIB study population at the McGill University Health Centre (Montreal, Quebec) were recruited (5). Study controls were asymptomatic patients undergoing screening colonoscopy, and excluded if there was any history of NVUGIB. DNA extracted from serum was genotyped for SNPs in the proinflammatory TNF-α (rs1799724, rs1800630, rs1799964) and NSAID-metabolizing CYP2C9 genes (rs1799853, rs1057910). Using STATA version 10, we assessed for any association between SNPs and NVUGIB events using logistic regression analysis and stratifying according to H pylori status, NSAID and PPI use. Our study included 23 patients and 46 controls of comparable age and sex, with NSAID (26.1% versus 6.7%) and PPI use (21.7% versus 13.0%) being more prevalent among patients. The TNFα1031C SNP, a proinflammatory cytokine polymorphism, was more common among patients with NVUGIB (OR 2.2 [95% CI 0.9 to 5.1]; P=0.084), particularly among those using PPIs (OR 20.0 [95% CI 0.9 to 429.9]; P=0.056) or not taking NSAIDs (OR 3.2 [95% CI 1.1 to 9.0]; P=0.027) at the time of the bleeding event. There was a trend in association of the TNF-α863A SNP with NVUGIB in patients not taking NSAIDs (OR 2.7 [95% CI 0.9 to 8.6]; P=0.071). We did not detect an association between CYP2C9 polymorphisms and NVUGIB, a result similar to that obtained in the study by Musumba et al (2). In conclusion, our pilot study demonstrates that TNF-α1031C SNP confers a risk for NVUGIB events among patients taking PPIs, a finding compatible with previous studies showing increased risk for peptic ulceration with this particular SNP (3

Age Is the Only Predictor of Poor Bowel Preparation in the Hospitalized Patient

We examine the impact of key variables on the likelihood of inpatient poor bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Records of inpatients that underwent colonoscopy at our institution between January 2010 and December 2011 were retrospectively extracted. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to assess the effect of clinical variables on the odds of poor preparation. Tested predictors included age; gender; use of narcotics; heavy medication burden; comorbidities; history of previous abdominal surgery; neurological disorder; product used for bowel preparation, whether or not the bowel regimen was given as split or standard dose; and time of endoscopy. Overall, 244 patients were assessed including 83 (34.0%, 95% CI: 28.1–39.9%) with poor bowel preparation. Cecal intubation was achieved in 81.1% of patients (95% CI: 76.2–86.0%). When stratified by quality of bowel preparation, cecal intubation was achieved in only 65.9% (95% CI: 60.0–71.9%) of patients with poor bowel preparation and 89.9% (95% CI: 86.1–93.7%) of patient with good bowel preparation. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only advancing age was an independent predictor of poor bowel preparation (OR = 1.026, CI: 1.006 to 1.045, and p = 0.008). Age is the only independent predictor of poor bowel preparation amongst hospitalized patients

Recommendations for the appropriate use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the era of the coxibs: Defining the role of gastroprotective agents

Treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs and the analgesic efficacy of conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are compromised by a two-to fourfold increased risk of gastrointestinal complications. This increased risk has resulted in an increasing use of the new selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors or coxibs, which, in clinical trials and outcomes studies, reduced gastrointestinal adverse events by 50% to 65% compared with conventional NSAIDs. However, the coxibs are not available to all patients who need them, and NSAIDs are still widely used. Moreover, treatment with a coxib cannot heal preexisting gastrointestinal lesions, and cotherapy with an antisecretory drug or mucosal protective agent may be required. This paper addresses the management of patients with risk factors for gastrointestinal complications who are taking NSAIDs and makes recommendations for the appropriate use of &apos;gastroproteccontinued on next pag

The impact of illness in patients with moderate to severe gastro-esophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease. It impairs health related quality of life (HRQL). However, the impact on utility scores and work productivity in patients with moderate to severe GERD is not well known. METHODS: We analyzed data from 217 patients with moderate to severe GERD (mean age 50, SD 13.7) across 17 Canadian centers. Patients completed three utility instruments – the standard gamble (SG), the feeling thermometer (FT), and the Health Utilities Index 3 (HUI 3) – and several HRQL instruments, including Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) and the Medical Outcomes Short Form-36 (SF-36). All patients received a proton pump inhibitor, esomeprazole 40 mg daily, for four to six weeks. RESULTS: The mean scores on a scale from 0 (dead) to 1 (full health) obtained for the FT, SG, and HUI 3 were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.70), 0.76 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.80), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.82) respectively. The mean scores on the SF-36 were lower than the previously reported Canadian and US general population mean scores and work productivity was impaired. CONCLUSION: GERD has significant impact on utility scores, HRQL, and work productivity in patients with moderate to severe disease. Furthermore, the FT and HUI 3 provide more valid measurements of HRQL in GERD than the SG. After treatment with esomeprazole, patients showed improved HRQL