14 research outputs found

    Impact économique de différents scenarios de replantation de vieille cocoteraie

    Full text link
    La culture du cocotier, traditionnelle dans les pays du Pacifique Sud, a pris son essor au cours de la période coloniale. En Papouasie-Nouvelle-Guinée, par exemple, la superficie plantée en cocotiers est passée de 16 000 ha en 1909 à quelque 105 000 ha au début de la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Après la guerre, la plantation de cocotier s’est intensifiée en milieu villageois pour porter la superficie totale actuelle à 260 000 hectares [1]. Devenant sénile, une bonne partie de cette superficie de cocoteraie est laissée à l’abandon car elle ne procure plus une source viable de revenus pour les exploitants. On peut donc s’attendre à voir disparaître 80 000 à 100 000 ha de cocoteraies au cours des vingt prochaines années dans ce pays. Le programme de recherche en agronomie et sur les systèmes de culture basé à Stewart Research Station a entrepris il y a quelques années l’étude des différentes voies possibles permettant d’améliorer et de diversifier les revenus par unité de surface

    Replanting/underplanting strategy for old coconut plantations in Papua New Guinea

    Full text link
    Dans la plupart des pays producteurs, la population de cocotiers vieillit et les moyens visant à leur remplacement sont rarement mis en oeuvre pour assurer le maintien de la production et sauvegarde l'avenir de l'industrie et sa rentabilité. La réhabilitation/replantation des cocoteraies et l'adoption de systèmes de cultures associées adaptés est l'un des principaux défis à relever pour l'avenir du cocotier dans la région Asie - Pacifique. L'exemple de la Papouasie-Nouvelle-Guinée (PNG) montre l'un des plus faibles rendements à l'hectare parmi les pays de la zone Asie-Pacifique. On dénombre près de 106 000 ha plantés entre 1910 et 1940, représentant environ 40% de la cocoteraie, et on peut donc envisager la disparition de 80 à 100 000 ha dans les vingt prochaines années. Face à cette prévision, l'Institut de Recherche sur le Cacao et le Cocotier de PNG (CCRI) a entrepris plusieurs actions à partir de la création d'un centre de recherche cocotier sur la Grande Terre de PNG : étude d'une stratégie de replantation des vieilles cocoteraies à partir de matériel végétal hybride, diffusion de matériel végétal amélioré à partir de la création d'un champ semencier et mise au point d'un outil de lutte pour contrôler les populations de ravageurs dans les zones à haut risque. L'expérimentation mise en place sur station vise à optimiser la date d'abattage des vieux arbres en mesurant les effets de compétition avec les hybrides complantés, et à déterminer d'un point de vue économique la meilleure stratégie à appliquer pour la mise en place de programmes de réhabilitation et/ou de replantation des cocoteraies âgées. Les résultats de ces actions sont présentés dans cette communication. (Résumé d'auteur

    Western Province: text summaries, maps, code lists and village identification

    No full text
    The major purpose of the Papua New Guinea Agricultural Systems Project is to produce information on small holder (subsistence) agriculture at provincial and national levels (Allen et al 1995). Information was collected by field observation, interviews with villagers and reference to published and unpublished documents. Methods are described by Bourke et al. (1993). This Working Paper contains a written summary of the information on the Agricultural Systems in this Province, maps of the location of agriculture systems, a complete listing of all information in the database in coded form, and lists of villages with National Population Census codes, indexed by agricultural systems. This information is available as a map-linked database (GIS) suitable for use on a personal computer in ESRI and MapInfo formats. An Agricultural System is identified when a set of similar agricultural crops and practices occur within a defined area. Six criteria are used to distinguish one system from another: 1. Fallow type (the vegetation which is cleared from a garden site before cultivation). 2. Fallow period (the length of time a garden site is left unused between cultivations). 3. Cultivation intensity (the number of consecutive crops planted before fallow). 4. The staple, or most important, crops. 5. Garden and crop segregation (the extent to which crops are planted in separate gardens; in separate areas within a garden; or are planted sequentially). 6. Soil fertility maintenance techniques (other than natural regrowth fallows). Where one or more of these factors differs significantly and the differences can be mapped, then a separate system is distinguished. Where variation occurs, but is not able to be mapped at 1:500 000 scale because the areas in which the variation occurs are too small or are widely dispersed within the larger system, a subsystem is identified. Subsystems within an Agricultural System are allocated a separate record in the database, identified by the Agricultural System number and a subsystem number. Sago is a widespread staple food in lowland Papua New Guinea. Sago is produced from palms which are not grown in gardens. Most of the criteria above cannot be applied. In this case, systems are differentiated on the basis of the staple crops only. The Papua New Guinea Resource Information System (PNGRIS) is a GIS which contains information on the natural resources of PNG (Bellamy 1986). PNGRIS contains no information on agricultural practices, other than an assessment of land use intensity based on air photograph interpretation by Saunders (1993. The Agricultural Systems Project is designed to provide detailed information on agricultural practices and cropping patterns as part of an upgraded PNGRIS geographical information system. For this reason the Agricultural Systems database contains almost no information on the environmental settings of the systems, except for altitude and slope. The layout of the text descriptions, the database code files and the village lists are similar to PNGRIS formats (Cuddy 1987). The mapping of Agricultural Systems has been carried out on the same map base and scale as PNGRIS (Tactical Pilotage Charts, 1:500 000). Agricultural Systems were mapped within the areas of agricultural land use established by Saunders (1993) from aerial photography. Except where specifically noted, Agricultural Systems boundaries have been mapped without reference to PNGRIS Resource Mapping Unit (RMU) boundaries. Agricultural Systems are defined at the level of the Province (following PNGRIS) but their wider distribution is recognised in the database by cross-referencing systems which cross provincial borders. A preliminary view of the relationships between PNGRIS RMUs and the Agricultural Systems in this Province can be obtained from the listing of villages by Agricultural System, where RMU numbers are appended. Allen, B. J., R. M. Bourke and R. L. Hide 1995. The sustainability of Papua New Guinea agricultural systems: the conceptual background. Global Environmental Change 5(4): 297-312. Bourke, R. M., R. L. Hide, B. J. Allen, R. Grau, G. S. Humphreys and H. C. Brookfield 1993. Mapping agricultural systems in Papua New Guinea. Population Family Health and Development. T. Taufa and C. Bass. University of Papua New Guinea Press, Port Moresby: 205-224. Bellamy, J. A. and J. R. McAlpine 1995. Papua New Guinea Inventory of Natural Resources, Population Distribution and Land Use Handbook. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation for the Australian Agency for International Development. PNGRIS Publication No. 6, Canberra. Cuddy, S. M. 1987. Papua New Guinea Inventory of Natural Resources, Population Distribution and Land Use: Code Files Part 1 Natural Resources. Division of Water and Land Resources, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation and Land Utilization Section, Department of Primary Industry, Papua New Guinea, Canberra

    New Ireland Province: Text summaries, maps, code lists and village identification

    No full text
    The major purpose of the Papua New Guinea Agricultural Systems Project is to produce information on small holder (subsistence) agriculture at provincial and national levels (Allen et al 1995). Information was collected by field observation, interviews with villagers and reference to published and unpublished documents. Methods are described by Bourke et al. (1993). This Working Paper contains a written summary of the information on the Agricultural Systems in this Province, maps of the location of agriculture systems, a complete listing of all information in the database in coded form, and lists of villages with National Population Census codes, indexed by agricultural systems. This information is available as a map-linked database (GIS) suitable for use on a personal computer in ESRI and MapInfo formats. An Agricultural System is identified when a set of similar agricultural crops and practices occur within a defined area. Six criteria are used to distinguish one system from another: 1. Fallow type (the vegetation which is cleared from a garden site before cultivation). 2. Fallow period (the length of time a garden site is left unused between cultivations). 3. Cultivation intensity (the number of consecutive crops planted before fallow). 4. The staple, or most important, crops. 5. Garden and crop segregation (the extent to which crops are planted in separate gardens; in separate areas within a garden; or are planted sequentially). 6. Soil fertility maintenance techniques (other than natural regrowth fallows). Where one or more of these factors differs significantly and the differences can be mapped, then a separate system is distinguished. Where variation occurs, but is not able to be mapped at 1:500 000 scale because the areas in which the variation occurs are too small or are widely dispersed within the larger system, a subsystem is identified. Subsystems within an Agricultural System are allocated a separate record in the database, identified by the Agricultural System number and a subsystem number. Sago is a widespread staple food in lowland Papua New Guinea. Sago is produced from palms which are not grown in gardens. Most of the criteria above cannot be applied. In this case, systems are differentiated on the basis of the staple crops only. The Papua New Guinea Resource Information System (PNGRIS) is a GIS which contains information on the natural resources of PNG (Bellamy 1986). PNGRIS contains no information on agricultural practices, other than an assessment of land use intensity based on air photograph interpretation by Saunders (1993. The Agricultural Systems Project is designed to provide detailed information on agricultural practices and cropping patterns as part of an upgraded PNGRIS geographical information system. For this reason the Agricultural Systems database contains almost no information on the environmental settings of the systems, except for altitude and slope. The layout of the text descriptions, the database code files and the village lists are similar to PNGRIS formats (Cuddy 1987). The mapping of Agricultural Systems has been carried out on the same map base and scale as PNGRIS (Tactical Pilotage Charts, 1:500 000). Agricultural Systems were mapped within the areas of agricultural land use established by Saunders (1993) from aerial photography. Except where specifically noted, Agricultural Systems boundaries have been mapped without reference to PNGRIS Resource Mapping Unit (RMU) boundaries. Agricultural Systems are defined at the level of the Province (following PNGRIS) but their wider distribution is recognised in the database by cross-referencing systems which cross provincial borders. A preliminary view of the relationships between PNGRIS RMUs and the Agricultural Systems in this Province can be obtained from the listing of villages by Agricultural System, where RMU numbers are appended. Allen, B. J., R. M. Bourke and R. L. Hide 1995. The sustainability of Papua New Guinea agricultural systems: the conceptual background. Global Environmental Change 5(4): 297-312. Bourke, R. M., R. L. Hide, B. J. Allen, R. Grau, G. S. Humphreys and H. C. Brookfield 1993. Mapping agricultural systems in Papua New Guinea. Population Family Health and Development. T. Taufa and C. Bass. University of Papua New Guinea Press, Port Moresby: 205-224. Bellamy, J. A. and J. R. McAlpine 1995. Papua New Guinea Inventory of Natural Resources, Population Distribution and Land Use Handbook. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation for the Australian Agency for International Development. PNGRIS Publication No. 6, Canberra. Cuddy, S. M. 1987. Papua New Guinea Inventory of Natural Resources, Population Distribution and Land Use: Code Files Part 1 Natural Resources. Division of Water and Land Resources, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation and Land Utilization Section, Department of Primary Industry, Papua New Guinea, Canberra

    Impact économique de différents scénarios de replantation de vieille cocoteraie

    No full text
    La culture du cocotier, traditionnelle dans les pays du Pacifique Sud, a pris son essor au cours de la période coloniale. En Papouasie-Nouvelle-Guinée, par exemple, la superficie plantée en cocotiers est passée de 16 000 ha en 1909 à quelque 105 000 ha au début de la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Après la guerre, la plantation de cocotier s’est intensifiée en milieu villageois pour porter la superficie totale actuelle à 260 000 hectares [1]. Devenant sénile, une bonne partie de cette superficie de cocoteraie est laissée à l’abandon car elle ne procure plus une source viable de revenus pour les exploitants. On peut donc s’attendre à voir disparaître 80 000 à 100 000 ha de cocoteraies au cours des vingt prochaines années dans ce pays. Le programme de recherche en agronomie et sur les systèmes de culture basé à Stewart Research Station a entrepris il y a quelques années l’étude des différentes voies possibles permettant d’améliorer et de diversifier les revenus par unité de surface
    corecore