29 research outputs found

    Análisis de co-palabras aplicado a los artículos muy citados en Biblioteconomía y Ciencias de la Información (2007-2017)

    Get PDF
    Se identifican las relaciones entre los conceptos y las áreas temáticas principales dentro de la categoría Biblioteconomía y Ciencias de la Información de Web of Science, en el periodo 2007-2017, utilizando la herramienta analítica “Essential Science Indicators”. Partiendo de los artículos altamente citados, la metodología consistió en la aplicación de análisis de co-palabras así como técnicas estadísticas de análisis multivariante y visualización a través de un mapa de la ciencia. Los resultados principales mostraron que las áreas de mayor interés para los investigadores fueron los estudios sobre la Web 2.0 basados en la participación colaborativa de los usuarios, la evaluación de las actividades científica, las métricas alternativas, o Altmetrics, desarrolladas en las plataformas sociales y académicas, la seguridad y confianza en los entornos virtuales y, por último, la aplicación de plataformas digitales en el comercio electrónicoThis paper aims to identify the conceptual structure in the category Library and Information Sciences in the Web of Science, in the period 2007-2017, using the analytical tool Essential Science Indicators. Based on highly cited papers, the methodology consisted in the application of co-word analysis and multivariate analysis techniques and visualization through science mapping. The main results showed that the studies on Web 2.0 based on the collaborative participation of the users, the evaluation of scientific activities, as well as the alternative metrics developed in the social and academic platforms, such as Altmetrics, trust in virtual environments, and the application of information technologies in companies and digital e-commerce platforms were the areas of greatest interest to the researchers

    Nuclear magnetic resonance data of C3H6AsClO2

    No full text

    A criteria-based assessment of the coverage of Scopus and Web of Science

    No full text
    This study analyses the differences between what the academic communities of a country regard should be included as original research publications for evaluation and funding and what the commercial providers of Scopus and Web of Science are able to provide within a similar limitation to publication type. The patterns of differences are described both with regard to publication type, field of research and language

    A criteria-based assessment of the coverage of Scopus and Web of Science

    No full text
    This study analyses the differences between what the academic communities of a country regard should be included as original research publications for evaluation and funding and what the commercial providers of Scopus and Web of Science are able to provide within a similar limitation to publication type. The patterns of differences are described both with regard to publication type, field of research and language
    corecore