Economic comparison of tillage and planting operations in three tillage systems

 To study the economy of tillage operations and present suitable systems for land preparation and planting, costs of execution of three different tillage operations in irrigated wheat crop were compared for three successive years.  The three systems include: conventional or maximum tillage (Max-till), reduced tillage (Red-till) using multitask machine, and using direct planting machinery to represent the no-tillage case (No-till).  Costs were composed of rental cost of tractor, the used implements, multitask machine and direct planting machine.  For each case, data were compared and analyzed in randomized block design.  The variance of wheat yield in the three tillage systems was significant at the 1% level.  Total costs per hectare were 109 and 78 and 46 Dollars for Max-till, Red-till and the No-till case, respectively.  Since, the test area under cultivation was part of a 200 hectare farm, crop protection and harvesting operations were carried out alike in the whole farm.  Accordingly, operations costs were estimated as 445 Dollars ha-1 tare.  Average yields of 7.85, 7.68, 5.2 t ha-1 were obtained, respectively, for Max-till, Red-till and No-till systems.  Since, the price per kg of wheat was equal to 0.36 Dollars ha-1, the profits of the harvest was equal to 2,271 Dollars ha-1 for the Max-till, 2,242 Dollars ha-1 for Red-till and 1,384 Dollars ha-1 for the No-till system.  In tillage and planting operations, usage of the reduce tillage system is offered as an alternative to the conventional tillage and no-till systems.  The Red-till system reduces fuel consumption, operation time, soil compaction due to decrease in the number of tractor trips, which leads to reduced production costs.  In addition, less investment in purchasing implements and preparation of the soil, which breaks the soil cohesion, are achieved with the reduced tillage system.   Keywords: costs of production, field performance, Max-till, Multitask machine, no-till, red-till, soil compaction

Simulation of draft force of winged share tillage tool using artificial neural network model

An artificial neural network (ANN) model, with a back propagation learning algorithm, was developed to predict draft requirements of two winged share tillage tools in a loam soil. The input parameters to the 3–7–1 ANN model were; share width, working depth and operating speed. The output from the network was the draft requirement of each tillage tool. The developed model predicted the draft requirements of the winged share tillage tools with a mean relative error of less than 7% and mean square errors of less than 0.05, when compared to measured draft values. This result indicates that the ANN model had successfully learnt from the training data set to enable correct interpolation and could be used as an alternative tool for modeling soil-tool interaction under specific experimental conditions and soil types

Special article: Update on the magnetically controlled growing rod: tips and pitfalls

published_or_final_versio

Next generation of growth-sparing techniques: preliminary clinical results of a magnetically controlled growing rod in 14 patients

Session 3A - Early Onset Scoliosis: Paper no. 33SUMMARY: Growth-sparing techniques are commonly used for the treatment of progressive EOS. The standard growing rod (GR) technique requires multiple surgeries for lengthening. The preliminary results of MCGR has shown the comparable outcomes to standard GR without the need for repeated surgery which can be expected to reduce the overall complication rate in GR surgery. INTRODUCTION: The growing rod (GR) technique for management of progressive Early-Onset Scoliosis (EOS) is a viable alternative but with a high complication rate attributed to frequent surgical lengthenings. The safety and efficacy of a non-invasive Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod (MCGR) has been previously reported in a porcine model. We are reporting the preliminary results of this technique in EOS. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively collected multi-center data. Only patients who underwent MCGR surgery and at least 3 subsequent spinal distractions were included in this preliminary review. Distractions were performed in clinic without anesthesia or analgesics. T1-T12 and T1-S1 height and the distraction distance inside the actuator were analyzed in addition to conventional clinical and radiographic data. RESULTS: Patients (N=14; 7 F and 7 M) had a mean age of 8y+10m (3y+6m to 12y+7m) and underwent a total of 14 index surgeries (SR: index single rod in 5 and DR: dual rod in 9) and 91 distractions. There were 5 idiopathic, 4 neuromuscular, 2 congenital, 2 syndromic and one NF. Mean follow-up (FU) was 10 months (5.8-18.2). Mean Cobb changed from 57° pre-op to 35° post-op and correction was maintained (35°) at latest FU. T1-T12 increased by 4 mm for SR and 10 mm for DR with mean monthly gain of 0.5 and 1.39, respectively. T1-S1 gain was 4 mm for SR and 17 mm for DR with mean monthly gain of 0.5 mm for SR and 2.35 mm for DR. The mean interval between index surgery and the first distraction was 66 days and thereafter was 43 days. Complications included one superficial infection in (SR), one prominent implant (DR) and minimal loss of initial distraction in three after index MCGR (all SR). Overall, partial loss of distraction was observed following 14 of the 91 distractions (one DR and 13 SR). This loss was regained in subsequent distractions. There was no neurologic deficit or implant failure. CONCLUSION: MCGR appears to be safe and provided adequate distraction similar to the standard GR technique without the need for repeated surgeries. DR patients had better initial curve correction and greater spinal height. No major complications were observed during the short follow-up period. The FDA has not cleared the drug and/or medical device for the use described in this presentation (i.e., the drug or medical device is being discussed for an ‘off label’ use).postprin

Magnetically controlled growing rods for severe spinal curvature in young children: A prospective case series

Scoliosis in skeletally immature children is often treated by implantation of a rod to straighten the spine. Rods can be distracted (lengthened) as the spine grows, but patients need many invasive operations under general anaesthesia. Such operations are costly and associated with negative psychosocial outcomes. We assessed the eff ectiveness and safety of a new magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) for non-invasive outpatient distractions. Methods We implanted the MCGR in fi ve patients, two of whom have now reached 24 months' follow-up. Each patient underwent monthly outpatient distractions. We used radiography to measure the magnitude of the spinal curvature, rod distraction length, and spinal length. We assessed clinical outcome by measuring the degree of pain, function, mental health, satisfaction with treatment, and procedure-related complications. Findings In the two patients with 24 months' follow-up, the mean degree of scoliosis, measured by Cobb angle, was 67° (SD 10°) before implantation and 29° (4°) at 24 months. Length of the instrumented segment of the spine increased by a mean of 1·9 mm (0·4 mm) with each distraction. Mean predicted versus actual rod distraction lengths were 2·3 mm (1·2 mm) versus 1·4 mm (0·7 mm) for patient 1, and 2·0 mm (0·2 mm) and 2·1 mm (0·7 mm) versus 1·9 mm (0·6 mm) and 1·7 mm (0·8 mm) for patient 2's right and left rods, respectively. Throughout follow-up, both patients had no pain, had good functional outcome, and were satisfi ed with the procedure. No MCGR-related complications were noted. Interpretation The MCGR procedure can be safely and eff ectively used in outpatient settings, and minimises surgical scarring and psychological distress, improves quality of life, and is more cost-eff ective than is the traditional growing rod procedure. The technique could be used for non-invasive correction of abnormalities in other disorders.postprin

Surgeon practices regarding infection prevention for growth friendly spinal procedures

Purpose The rate of infection in patients having growth sparing surgery for early onset scoliosis has been reported up to 25 % during the course of treatment. A recent study demonstrated significant variability in the approach to infection prevention in adolescent and neuromuscular scoliosis. The purpose of this study is to conduct a similar survey in order to understand approaches used by experienced pediatric spinal surgeons with regard to infection prevention in growth friendly spinal procedures. Materials and methods After preliminary internal testing of a survey by the authors, a final 21-question survey was created and approved by the authors and electronically distributed to all members of the Chest Wall Spinal Deformity Study Group and the Growing Spine Study Group (n = 57). A total of 40 responses were obtained (70 %). Results: Significant variability in practice was demonstrated across the majority of the questions answered. Several of the questions demonstrated relative equipoise between practices, including preoperative MRSA screening, preoperative chlorhexidine baths, postoperative antibiotic duration after insertion, use of topical antibiotics, use of drains, use of IV gram negative coverage or vancomycin, and skin preparation. Conclusion: Other studies have demonstrated that variability in practice may have a negative impact on clinical outcomes, so one could postulate that steps that can reduce variability in the current population may help improve outcomes in this population. Areas of clinical equipoise can be used to help design and direct multicenter studies with an ultimate goal of reducing infections in this population. Level of evidence Level V. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11832-014-0584-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users

Is There a Patient Profile That Characterizes a Patient With Adult Spinal Deformity as a Candidate for Minimally Invasive Surgery?

Study designRetrospective review.ObjectivesThe goal of this study was to evaluate the baseline characteristics of patients chosen to undergo traditional open versus minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for adult spinal deformity (ASD).MethodsA multicenter review of 2 databases including ASD patients treated with surgery. Inclusion criteria were age >45 years, Cobb angle minimum of 20°, and minimum 2-year follow-up. Preoperative radiographic parameters and disability outcome measures were reviewed.ResultsA total of 350 patients were identified: 173 OPEN patients and 177 MIS. OPEN patients were significantly younger than MIS patients (61.5 years vs 63.74 years, P = .013). The OPEN group had significantly more females (87% vs 76%, P = .006), but both groups had similar body mass index. Preoperative lumbar Cobb was significantly higher for the OPEN group (34.2°) than for the MIS group (26.0°, P < .001). The mean preoperative Oswestry Disability Index was significantly higher in the MIS group (44.8 in OPEN patients and 49.8 in MIS patients, P < .011). The preoperative Numerical Rating Scale value for back pain was 7.2 in the OPEN group and 6.8 in the MIS group preoperatively, P = .100.ConclusionsPatients chosen for MIS for ASD are slightly older and have smaller coronal deformities than those chosen for open techniques, but they did not have a substantially lesser degree of sagittal malalignment. MIS surgery was most frequently utilized for patients with an sagittal vertical axis under 6 cm and a baseline pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis mismatch under 30°

The safety and efficacy of a remotely distractible, magnetic controlled growing rod (MCGR) for the treatment of scoliosis in children: a prospective case series with minimum two year follow-up

Concurrent Session 2B - Early Onset Scoliosis: paper no. 26SUMMARY: The growing rod has been the gold standard for the treatment of scoliosis in young children. However, such management requires multiple open surgeries under general anesthesia for rod distraction and is associated with numerous postoperative complications. To avoid such pitfalls, we utilized a magnetically-controlled growing rod (MCGR) implant. Our study found that the MCGR was safe and effective, allowing for distractions on a non-invasive out-patient basis at monthly intervals, eliminating the need for surgeries and their associated complications. Introduction: Traditionally, growing rods are the standard of treatment for young children with severe spinal deformities and significant residual growth potential. However, this requires repeated open distractions under general anesthesia and is associated with numerous post-operative complications. This report addresses the safety and efficacy of the MCGR implant for non-invasive out-patient distractions for scoliosis correction in young children. METHODS: This was a prospective, patient series of the MCGR procedure. From November 2009 to March 2011, five patients (n=3 female; n=2 male) were treated with the MCGR. In this study, we report the first three patients (2 females and 1 male) with minimum 2 years follow-up. All cases were non-invasively distracted using an external magnet on a monthly basis. Pre and post distraction radiographs were carried out to assess the Cobb’s angle, predicted versus achieved rod distraction length and spinal length. Clinical outcome assessment was performed with the pain score (Visual Analogue Scale) and the SRS-30 questionnaire. All procedural or rod related complications were recorded. RESULTS: The main correction of the Cobb’s angle was obtained in the initial surgery and was maintained. The mean monthly increase in T1-T12, T1-S1 and instrumented segment length was 1.6mm, 2.5mm and 1.2mm, respectively. Predicted versus actual length gain per distraction were similar. One case had a superficial wound infection and there was one event of loss of distraction. On last follow-up, no pain was noted and SRS-30 scores remained unchanged to baseline. CONCLUSION: The MCGR is a safe and effective procedure for the surgical treatment of scoliosis in children. The MCGR provides external distractions on an out-patient basis without the need for sedation or anesthesia, and that remote distraction allows more frequent lengthening of the rod that may more closely mimic physiologic growth.postprin

Nutritional improvement following growing rod surgery in children with early onset scoliosis

Purpose We aimed to evaluate the nutritional status of children with early onset scoliosis (EOS) and to determine if treatment with growing rod instrumentation improves weight percentile. Methods: Data was retrospectively collected on 88 EOS patients treated with growing rods at six institutions. Mean age at surgery was 5.8 years, and mean Cobb angle was 75°. All patients were followed for at least 2 years (mean 4 years). Weights were converted to normative percentiles based on the patients’ age and gender. Results: Preoperatively, 47 % (41/88) of patients were 0.05). Children with neuromuscular and syndromic diagnoses do not appear to improve their mean nutritional status after surgery when compared to patients with idiopathic or congenital/structural scoliosis (p = 0.006). Conclusion: Following growing rod treatment, there was significant improvement in nutritional status in approximately 50 % of patients, similar to that reported with VEPTR. Neuromuscular and syndromic patients did not experience nutritional improvement post-operatively. These findings support the theory that growing rods improve the clinical status of EOS patients, as nutritional improvement is one outcome of improved clinical status. The relationship between age at initial surgery and nutritional improvement is intriguing