Retrieval of multiple separated endodontic instruments using ultrasonic vibration: Case report

AbstractThis report describes the management of a complicated clinical case with three instruments fractured in one tooth. A 32-year-old patient presented with three ProTaper rotary files fractured in the upper right second molar (S2 and F2 in the disto-buccal canal and S1 in the mesio-buccal canal). A staging platform was prepared in the distal canal coronal to the fragments. Under dental microscope magnification, an Endo-4 ultrasonic tip was activated to dislodge the more coronal fragment (S2) by trephining dentine around the coronal aspect of the fragment. After 11 min, the fragment became loose and was removed. Following the same protocol and using an Endo-5 ultrasonic tip, the second fragment (F2) was removed in approximately 17 min. The first attempt to remove the S1 fragment from the mesio-buccal canal was not successful. An attempt to bypass this fragment using a K-file also failed. A second attempt using the ultrasonic technique resulted in a secondary fracture of the coronal aspect of the fragment. An Endo-5 ultrasonic tip was used to dislodge the fragment, which was successfully removed in 7 min. This report concludes that once a fractured file is bypassed, the instrumentation of a root canal is best completed with hand files. Clinicians should identify their limitations and consider referring cases that are beyond their abilities. Good experience and an appropriate armamentarium enable successful management of complicated cases. Ultrasonic vibration and dental microscope magnification contribute to successful removal of fractured instruments

Modalities of using endodontic nickel-titanium rotary instruments and factors influencing their implementation in dental practice

Abstract Background To establish the extent of using nickel titanium rotary instruments (NiTi-RIs), to identify reasons for using / not using NiTi-RIs, to explore usage modalities and to identify factors and measures that can increase implementation of NiTi-RIs in general dental practice. Methods Two pilot questionnaires were conducted on academic staff members at College of Dentistry, Taibah University, general dentists (GDs) and endodontists to finalise the questionnaire. A sample size was calculated considering the expected and minimum accepted response rates (60 and 48%, respectively) and a 99.9% Confidence Level. The online-questionnaire was sent to 600 GDs and all endodontists (175) working in Saudi Arabia. A reminder was emailed after 10 weeks to encourage non-respondents to complete the questionnaire. Responses, were collected and converted into numerical data which were analysed using the Chi-square test (p = 0.05). Results Significantly most respondents (71.9%) used NiTi-RIs (p < 0.001); with more endodontists (96.9%) than GDs (60%). Most users (62.5%) had been using NiTi-RIs for More than 3 years (p < 0001). The trend of using NiTi-RIs increased as participants’ experience and the number of root-canal treatments performed per week increased (p = 0.021). While most respondents (45.3%) used NiTi-RIs because of faster root-canal preparation, the majority of non-users (85.3%) didn’t do so because of high cost. The highest proportion (43.3%) reported better undergraduate education as the most important factor that can significantly increase NiTi-RIs usage. The majority (91.8%) prepared glide-path before using NiTi-RIs; especially with stainless steel hand-files (63.3%). Conclusions NiTi-RIs are relatively well adopted in Saudi dental practice. However, better education, especially during undergraduate training and lower cost can increase their usage. Overall, clinicians showed good awareness of NiTi-RIs usage aspects which reflected on usage modalities

Management of intracanal separated instruments

Introduction Intracanal separation of endodontic instruments may hinder cleaning and shaping procedures within the root canal system, with a potential impact on the outcome of treatment. The purposes of this narrative review of separated instruments were to (1) review the literature regarding treatment options, influencing factors, and complications and (2) suggest a decision-making process for their management. Methods An online search was conducted in peer-review journals listed in PubMed to retrieve clinical and experimental studies, case reports, and review articles by using the following key words: instruments, files, obstructions, fractured, separated, broken, removal, retrieval, management, bypassing, and complications with or without root canal and endodontic. Results There is a lack of high-level evidence on management of separated instruments. Conventional conservative management includes removal of or bypassing the fragment or filling the root canal system to the coronal level of the fragment. A surgical intervention remains an alternative approach. These approaches are influenced by a number of factors and may be associated with complications. On the basis of current clinical evidence, a decision-making process for management is suggested. Conclusions Guidelines for management of intracanal separated instruments have not been formulated. Decisions on management should consider the following: (1) the constraints of the root canal accommodating the fragment, (2) the stage of root canal preparation at which the instrument separated, (3) the expertise of the clinician, (4) the armamentaria available, (5) the potential complications of the treatment approach adopted, and (6) the strategic importance of the tooth involved and the presence/or absence of periapical pathosis. Clinical experience and understanding of these influencing factors as well as the ability to make a balanced decision are essential

Multidisciplinary management of concomitant pulpal and periodontal lesion: A case report

In this case report, the management of a concomitant endodontic-periodontal lesion case is described. A 31-year-old patient presented with symptomatic apical periodontitis of tooth #36 due to failed endodontic treatment and a generalized aggressive periodontitis. Following full-mouth scaling and root-planing, a root-canal retreatment (tooth #36) was initiated. While the distal and mesio-buccal canals were successfully treated, a transportation perforation of the mesio-lingual canal occurred and was repaired by the MTA. An apical microsurgery of the mesial root combined with surgical periodontal debridement for the lower left quadrant was performed. Three weeks later, resective and regenerative periodontal surgeries of the other 3 quadrants were accomplished. Because of the 6-month post-operative healing, the regenerative periodontal surgery for the lower-left quadrant was performed. The 6-month post-operative recall showed complete healing of the mesial root lesion and reduction of the distal root lesion. The multidisciplinary approach and advanced armamentarium contributed to favourable outcome