7 research outputs found

    Factors affecting the choice of therapeutic regimens in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients and patient adherence to the therapies prescribed

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are the most common chronic respiratory diseases worldwide. At the moment, there is no information about the preferences of Polish specialists as regards the treatment of asthma and COPD or factors influencing the choice of particular treatment regimens. Aim: To determine the treatment options most commonly used by experienced pulmonologists and allergists for asthma and COPD and to identify the factors affecting the choice of a particular therapy. Material and methods: The survey included 224 doctors (pulmonologists and allergists) across Poland and concerned patients diagnosed with asthma (n = 4358) and COPD (n = 3062). Results: In the case of asthma, the most common therapy applied was inhaled glucocorticosteroids and long-acting \beta2 agonists. According to 27.2% of doctors, combination therapy was used in 70-80% of patients while 23.7% declared that the proportion of patients receiving such a treatment exceeded 80%. In the case of COPD, anticholinergics were most frequently prescribed when inhaled glucocorticosteroids and long-acting \beta2 agonists had proved insufficient. According to 21% of specialists, the percentage of patients treated so was 41-50%, while 19% declared the use of this treatment in 71-80% of patients. Conclusions: The most common treatments for asthma and COPD in Poland are inhaled glucocorticosteroids and long-acting \beta2 agonists. The main factors influencing treatment decisions are the current GINA and GOLD recommendations as well as patients' age, comorbidities, and price of treatment

    Lower utilization of home blood pressure monitoring in younger, poorly educated hypertensive males – real-life data

    No full text
    Background: Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) became a standard in the management of hypertension. However, there are few data concerning the utilisation of blood pressure (BP) monitors in daily clinical practice. Aim: The aim of this analysis was to show: (1) how frequently hypertensive patients are equipped with BP monitors, (2) how often they perform regular HBPM and running BP diaries, (3) what are the correlates of utilisation of BP monitors, in a large real-life cohort of hypertensives examined for the efficacy of antihypertensive therapy. Patients and methods: The survey was conducted by 570 physicians among 14,200 hypertensive patients, of whom 12,289 (6163 women; mean age 63 ± 12 years) declared use of antihypertensive medicines. Each patient was asked whether at home is having and using regularly or occasionally BP monitor and running BP diary. BP control was assessed based on the mean of two attended office BP measurements. Results: Among patient equipped with BP monitors (87.2%), 73.4% were conducting HBPM regularly, while 26.6% occasionally, and 66.9% were running BP diaries. Controlled BP was achieved by 34.5% (32.9% men and 36.1% women; p < .001), more frequently by equipped with BP monitors (34.9 vs 31.7%, p < .001). Female sex, education, professional activity, active lifestyle, older age, hypertensive polytherapy, longer than 5-year therapy for hypertension, and coexistence of diabetes were factors increasing, while alcohol consumption, visceral obesity and heart failure decreasing the probability of being equipped with BP monitor and running BP diary. Regular HBPM were more frequently among women, physically active, older, diabetics, viscerally obese and patients with coronary artery disease. Conclusions: (1) The majority of hypertensive Poles are already equipped with BP monitors, (2) three-fourth patients perform regular HBPM and two-third run BP diaries, (3) there is still a need to promote utilisation of BP monitors among younger, poorly educated hypertensive males

    The Efficacy, Tolerance and Acceptance of a New Fixed-Dose Salmeterol and Fluticasone Propionate Dry-Powder Inhaler—Salflumix Easyhaler<sup>®</sup> in COPD Patients in the Daily Clinical Practice

    No full text
    The efficacy of the fix-dose salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was only shown for the original product. This investigator-initiated study aimed to prove the efficacy and safety of Salflumix Easyhaler®, a second-entry product (dry-powder inhaler) in a real-life setting. The efficacy of the therapy was assessed in 440 COPD outpatients (36.1% classified as C&D groups according to GOLD) using the COPD assessment test (CAT) and the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC). During 86 ± 30 days, the frequency of COPD with a big and very big impact on life (CAT > 20 pts); and high scores of dyspnea (mMRC ≥ 2) decreased from 60.7% and 57.5% at I visit to 15.2% and 22.6% at III visits, respectively (p ® as very low. Adherence exceeded 90%. This study supports effectiveness, satisfaction, and convenience with the use of this new product in COPD, and shows that ICS-containing DPI therapy is still improperly prescribed for patients with a low risk of COPD exacerbation in real-life settings

    Evaluation of the Efficiency of Single-Inhaler Combination Therapy with Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate in Patients with Bronchial Asthma in Daily Clinical Practice

    No full text
    <h2>Article full text</h2><p>The full text of this article can be found here <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-017-0641-5">https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-017-0641-5</a>.</p><h2>Provide enhanced content for this article</h2><p>If you are an author of this publication and would like to provide additional enhanced content for your article then please contact <a href="http://www.medengine.com/Redeem/”mailto:[email protected]”">[email protected]</a>.</p><p>The journal offers a range of additional features designed to increase visibility and readership. All features will be thoroughly peer reviewed to ensure the content is of the highest scientific standard and all features are marked as ‘peer reviewed’ to ensure readers are aware that the content has been reviewed to the same level as the articles they are being presented alongside. Moreover, all sponsorship and disclosure information is included to provide complete transparency and adherence to good publication practices. This ensures that however the content is reached the reader has a full understanding of its origin. No fees are charged for hosting additional open access content.</p><p>Other enhanced features include, but are not limited to:</p><ul><li>Slide decks</li><li>Videos and animations</li><li>Audio abstracts</li><li>Audio slides</li></ul
    corecore